Skip to main content
Log in

Sonographic, manometric, and myographic evaluation of the anal sphincters morphology and function

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: A direct comparison of anal sphincter physiology (muscle performance and anatomy-muscle thickness) has not yet been undertaken but may be of importance in patients with defecation disorders. METHODS: We evaluated 15 healthy volunteers by means of anorectal manometry to determine pressure functions of the internal and external anal sphincter. Transcutaneous electromyography was recorded to assess the electrical activity of the external anal sphincter. Thickness of the anal sphincter muscles was measured sonographically from within the anal canal with dorsal projection using a 7.5-MHz 360° rectal panorama scanner. RESULTS: It was shown that neither is the muscle thickness of the external anal sphincter during rest (6.26±1.02 mm) or during squeezing (7.40±1.39 mm) correlated to its squeeze pressure (138.8±15.2 mmHg), nor is the diameter of the internal anal sphincter (2.09±0.58 mm) correlated to its resting pressure (61.1±15.2 mmHg). Finally, the thicker the internal anal sphincter muscle, the lower the electrical activity of the external anal sphincter during squeezing (r=0.74,P <0.001). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that both manometry to assess sphincter function and sonography to determine sphincter morphology are important measures in the evaluation of continence function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Read NW, Bannister JJ. Anorectal manometry: techniques in health and anorectal disorder. In: Henry M, Swash M, eds. Coloproctology and the pelvic floor. London: Butterworth, 1984:65–87.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Enck P, Kuhlbusch R, Lübke H, Frieling T, Erckenbrecht JF. Age and sex and anorectal manometry in fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:1026–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar D, Williams NS, Waldron D, Wingate DL. Prolonged manometric recording of anorectal motor activity in ambulant human subjects: evidence of periodic activity. Gut 1989;30:1007–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Enck P, Eggers E, Bielefeld K, Koletzko S, Erckenbrecht JF. Spontaneous variation of anal “resting” pressure in healthy humans. Am J Physiol 1991;261:G823–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Orkin BA, Hansen RB, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Dent J. Human anal motility while fasting, after feeding, and during sleep. Gastroenterology 1991;100:1016–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pittman JS, Benson T, Summers JE. Physiologic evaluation of the anorectum: a new ultrasound technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:476–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartrams CI. A comparison between electromyography and anal endsonography in mapping external anal sphincter defects. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:370–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamm MA, Hoyle CH, Burleigh DE,et al. Hereditary internal anal sphincter myopathy causing proctalgia fugax and constipation. Gastroenterology 1991;100:805–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eckardt VF, Nic W. The anal sphincter in patients with myotonic dystrophy. Gastroenterology 1991;100:424–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Burnett SJD, Bartrams CI. Endosonographic variation in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991;6:2–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartrams CI. Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1991;78:312–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Felt-Bersma RJ, Strijers RI, Janssen JJW, Visser SI, Meuwissen SG. The external anal sphincter. Relationship between manometry and anal electromyography and its clinical relevance. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:112–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Salanga VD, Corredor C, Jagelman DG. Neurophysiologic assessment of the anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1991:34:606–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pinho M, Hosie K, Bielecki K, Keighley MR. Assessment of non-invasive intra-anal electromyography to evaluate sphincter function. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:69–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Binnie NR, Kawimbe BM, Papachrysostomou M, Clare N, Smith AN. The importance of the orientation of the electrode plate in recording the external anal sphincter EMG by non-invasive anal plug electrodes. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991;6:5–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Enck P, Rühl A, Gantke B. Biofeedback training for fecal incontinence. ColoProctology 1992;14:204–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bleijenberg G, Kuipers HC. Treatment of spastic pelvic floor syndrome with biofeedback. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:108–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by Grant En0/10 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

About this article

Cite this article

Gantke, B., Schäfer, A., Enck, P. et al. Sonographic, manometric, and myographic evaluation of the anal sphincters morphology and function. Dis Colon Rectum 36, 1037–1041 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047296

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047296

Key words

Navigation