Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of oleoresin constituents fromPinus ponderosa andPinus jeffreyi on growth of mycangial fungi fromDendroctonus ponderosae andDendroctonus jeffreyi

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dendroctonus jeffreyi andD. ponderosae are morphologically similar sympatric species of pine bark beetles over portions of their geographic ranges; however,D. jeffreyi is monophagous onP. jeffreyi whileD. ponderosae is highly polyphagous. Both species carry a species of mycangial fungi that are also very similar in appearance. Growth of the two mycangial fungi and of the fungusLeptographium terebrantis (associated with the polyphagous and non-tree-killingDendroctonus valens) in the presence of oleoresin constituents of host and nonhost conifers was tested by placing individual chemicals on agar growth medium and by growing the cultures in saturated atmospheres of the chemicals. The fungus associated withD. jeffreyi showed greater tolerance for chemical constituents placed on the growth medium than the other two fungi, and growth after three days was enhanced by heptane, the dominant constituent ofP. jeffreyi oleoresin. Growth of all three species of fungi was reduced by the resin constituents when the chemicals were presented as saturated atmospheres. The results suggest that the influence of the tree on growth of the symbiotic fungi of the bark beetles during the initial attack process may be different than after colonization by the beetles is complete. The difference in the responses of the apparently related species of mycangial fungi may provide some new insight into the evolutionary history of these beetle/mycangial fungus/host tree systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, A.B., Rirrer, R., andWong, A. 1969. Monoterpenes, fatty and resin acids ofPinus ponderosa andPinus jeffreyi.Phytochemistry 8:873–875.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barras, S.J. 1970. Antagonism betweenDendroctonus frontalis and the fungusCeratosystis minor.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 63:1187–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barras, S.J. 1973. Reduction of progeny and development in the southern pine beetle following removal of symbiotic fungi.Can. Entomol. 105:1295–1299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barras, S.J., andPerry, T. 1972. Fungal symbionts in the prothoracic mycangium ofDendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Z. Angew. Entomol. 71:95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basham, H.G. 1970. Wilt of loblolly pine inoculated with the blue-stain fungi of the genusCeratocystis.Phytopathology 60:750–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, A.A. 1972. Resistance of conifers to invasion by bark beetle-fungal associations.Bioscience 22:598–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, J.R. 1983. Mycangial fungi ofDendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and their relationship to beetle population trends.Environ. Entomol. 12:858–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, J.R. 1985. Relationship of symbiotic fungi to southern pine beetle population trends, pp. 127–135,in S.J. Branham and R.C. Thatcher (eds.). Integrated Pest Management Research Symposium: The Proceedings. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, So. Forest Experiment Station, General Technical Report SO-56.

  • Bridges, J.R. 1987. Effects of terpenoid compounds on growth of symbiotic fungi associated with the southern pine beetle.Phytopathology 77:83–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, J.R., andPerry, T.J. 1985. Effects of mycangial fungi on gallery construction and distribution of blue-stain in southern pine beetle infested bolts.J. Entomol. Sci. 20:271–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, J.R., Nettleton, W.A., andConnor, M.D. 1985. Southern pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) infestations without the bluestain fungus,Ceratocystis minor.J. Econ. Entomol. 78:325–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, F.W., Jr., Kristic, M., Zavarin, E., andBarber, H.W., Jr. 1968. Inhibitory effects of volatile oleoresin components onFomes annosus and fourCeratocystis species.Phytopathology 58:1199–1324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowells, H.A. 1965. Silvics of forest trees of the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Agriculture Handbook No. 271. 762 pp.

  • Gambliel, H.A., Cates, R.G., Caffey-Moquin, M.K., andPaine, T.D. 1985. Variation in the chemistry of loblolly pine in relation to infection by the blue-stain fungus, pp. 177–184,in S.J. Branham and R.C. Thatcher (eds.). Integrated Pest Management Research Symposium: The Proceedings. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, So. Forest Experiment station, General Technical Report SO-56.

  • Goldhammer, D.S., Stephen, F.M., andPaine, T.D. 1990. The effect ofCeratocystis minor, Ceratocystis minor var.barrasii, and SBJ 122 on reproduction in the southern pine beetle,Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 122:407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetrich, L.A. 1949. Some overlooked relationships of the southern pine beetle.J. Econ. Entomol. 42:466–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horntvedt, R., Christiansen, E., Solheim, H., andWang, S. 1983. Artificial inoculation withIps typographus-associated blue-stain fungi can kill healthy Norway spruce trees.Medd. Nor. Skogforoesksves. 38:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, G.N., andWood, D.L. 1968. Controlled mating, karyology, morphology, and sex ratio in theDendroctonus ponderosae complex.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61:517–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathre, D.E. 1964. Pathogenicity ofCeratocystis ips andCeratocystis minor toPinus ponderosa.Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 22:363–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirov, N.T. 1929. Chemical analysis of the oleoresins as a means of distinguishing Jeffrey pine and western yellow pine.J. Forest. 27:176–187.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munz, P.A., andKeck, D.D. 1968. A California Flora. University of California Press, Berkeley. 1679 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D.R., Lindahl, K.Q., Jr., Wood, D.L., andParmeter, J.R., Jr. 1987. Pathogenicity of fungi isolated fromDendroctonus valens, D. brevicomis, andD. ponderosae to ponderosa pine seedlings.Phytopathology 77:631–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, T.D. 1984a. Seasonal response of ponderosa pine to inoculation of the mycangial fungi from the western pine beetle.Can. J. Bot. 62:551–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, T.D. 1984b. Influence of the mycangial fungi of the western pine beetle on water conduction through ponderosa pine seedlings.Can. J. Bot. 62:556–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, T.D., andBirch, M.C. 1983. Acquisition and maintenance of mycangial fungi byDendroctonus brevicomis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Environ. Entomol. 12:1384–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, T.D., Blanche, C.A., Nebeker, T.E., andStephen, F.M. 1987. Composition of loblolly pine resin defenses: Comparison of monoterpenes from induced lesion and sapwood resin.Can. J. For. Res. 17:1202–1206.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raffa, K.F., Berryman, A.A., Simasko, J., Teal, W., andWong, B.L. 1985. Effects of grand fir monoterpenes on the fir engraver,Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), and its symbiotic fungus.Environ. Entomol. 14:552–226.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.H. 1963. Toxicity of pine resin vapors to three species ofDendroctonus bark beetles.J. Econ. Entomol. 56:827–831.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.H. 1965. A physiological difference among beetles ofDendroctonus ponderosae (=D. monticolae) andD. ponderosae (=D. jeffreyi).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 58:440–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.H. 1967. Variations in the monoterpene composition of the wood resin of jeffrey, washoe, coulter, and lodgepole pines.For. Sci. 13:246–252.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.H. 1971. Xylem monoterpenes ofPinus ponderosa, P. washoensis, andP. jeffreyi in the Warner mountains of California.Madrono. 21:26–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.H. 1982. Xylem monoterpenes of some hard pines of western North America: three studies. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Research Paper PSW-160. 7 pp.

  • Whitney, H.S. 1971. Association ofDendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) with blue stain fungi and yeasts during brood development in lodgepole pine.Can. Entomol. 103:1495–1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, H.S. 1982. Relationships between bark beetles and symbiotic organisms, pp. 183–211,in J.B. Mitton and K.B. Sturgeon (eds.). Bark Beetles in North American Conifers. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, H.S., andCobb, F.W., Jr. 1972. Non-staining fungi associated with the bark beetleDendroctonus brevicomis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) onPinus ponderosa.Can. J. Bot. 50:1943–1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, H.S., andFarris, S.H. 1970. Maxillary mycangium in the mountain pine beetle.Science 167:54–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.L. 1972. Selection and colonization of ponderosa pine by bark beetles, pp. 101–107,in H.F. van Emden (ed.). Royal Entomological Society Symposium No. 6: Insect/Plant Interactions. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S.L. 1982. The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs No. 6. 1359 pp.

  • Wood, S.L. 1963. A revision of the bark beetle genusDendroctonus Erichson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Great Basin Nat. 23:1–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paine, T.D., Hanlon, C.C. Influence of oleoresin constituents fromPinus ponderosa andPinus jeffreyi on growth of mycangial fungi fromDendroctonus ponderosae andDendroctonus jeffreyi . J Chem Ecol 20, 2551–2563 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02036191

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02036191

Key Words

Navigation