Abstract
November-felled Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) logs with and without branches were left lying on the forest floor through August. In May, as the logs were being colonized by ambrosia beetles,Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) andGnathotrichus retusus (LeConte), the ethanol, acetaldehyde, and water concentrations in the delimbed logs were significantly higher than in the branched logs. Since both log types received the same rainfall, lower water contents in branched logs was probably the result of absorbed water being transported through the branches via capillary movement and evaporation. Lower tissue water levels could have prevented the establishment and maintenance of anaerobic conditions, thus limiting the synthesis of acetaldehyde and ethanol in the branched logs. By late August, the beetle densities in delimbed logs were 9–16 times greater than in the branched logs. Log ethanol concentrations could be a key chemical factor affecting the ambrosia beetle attack densities. Acetaldehyde concentrations in the logs also may have affected the attack densities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borden, J.H., Lindgren, B.S., andChong, L. 1980. Ethanol andα-pinene as synergists for the aggregation pheromones of twoGnathotrichus species.Can. J. For. Res. 10:290–292.
Cade, S.C. 1970. The host selection behavior ofGnathotrichus sulcatus LeConte. PhD dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Cade, S.C., Hrutfiord, B.F., andGara, R.I. 1970. Identification of a primary attractant forGnathotrichus sulcatus isolated from western hemlock logs.J. Econ. Entomol. 63:1014–1015.
Carpenter, S.E., Harmon, M.E., Ingham, E.R., Kelsey, R.G., Lattin, J.D., andSchowalter, T.D. 1988. Early patterns of heterotroph activity in conifer logs.Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 94B:33–43.
Chapman, J.A. 1961. A note on felling date in relation to log attack by the ambrosia beetleTrypodendron.Can. Dep. For. Bi-Mon. Prog. Rep. 17:3–4.
Crawford, R.M.M. andBaines, M.A. 1977. Tolerance of anoxia and the metabolism of ethanol in tree roots.New Phytol. 79:519–526.
Crawford, R.M.M., andFinegan, D.M. 1989. Removal of ethanol from lodgepole pine roots.Tree Physiol. 5:53–61.
Davies, D.D. 1980. Anaerobic metabolism and the production of organic acids, pp. 581–611,in D.D. Davies (ed.). The Biochemistry of Plants, Vol. 2, Metabolism and Respiration. Academic Press, New York.
Dowding, P. 1984. The evolution of insect-fungus relationships in the primary invasion of forest timber, pp. 135–153,in J.M. Anderson, A.D.M. Rayner, and D.W.H. Walton (eds.). Invertebrate Microbial Interactions. British Mycological Society Symposium 6. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dyer, E.D.A. 1963. Distribution ofTrypodendron attacks around the circumference of logs.Can. Dep. For. Bi-Mon. Prog. Rep. 19:3–4.
Dyer, E.D.A., andChapman, J.A. 1965. Flight and attack of the ambrosia beetle,Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) in relation to felling date of logs.Can. Entomol. 97:42–57.
Graham, K. 1968. Anaerobic induction of primary chemical attractancy for ambrosia beetles.Can. J. Zool. 46:905–908.
Harry, D.E., andKimmerer, T.W. 1991. Molecular genetics and physiology of alcohol dehydrogenase in woody plants.For. Ecol. Manage. 43:251–272.
Johnson, N.E. 1958. Ambrosia beetle infestation of coniferous logs on clearcuttings in northwestern Oregon.J. For. 56:508–511.
Johnson, N.E. 1961. Ambrosia beetle attacks in young-growth western hemlock.Can. Dep. For. Bi-Mon. Prog. Rep. 17:3.
Johnson, N.E. 1964. Effects of different drying rates and two insecticides on beetle attacks in felled Douglas fir and western hemlock. Weyerhaeuser Company Forestry Research Note 58. Weyerhaeuser Company Forestry Research Center, Centralia, Washington.
Johnson, N.E. andZingg, J.G. 1969. Transpirational drying of Douglas-fir: Effect on log moisture content and insect attack.J. For. 67:816–819.
Kelsey, R.G. 1994. Ethanol synthesis in Douglas-fir logs felled in November, January, and March and its relationship to ambrosia beetle attack.Can. J. For. Res. 24:In press.
Kimmerer, T.W. andMacDonald, R.C. 1987. Acetaldehyde and ethanol biosynthesis in leaves of plants.Plant Physiol. 84:1204–1209.
Kimmerer, T.W., andStringer, M.A. 1988. Alcohol dehydrogenase and ethanol in the stems of trees.Plant Physiol. 87:693–697.
Kinghorn, J.M. 1957. Two practical methods of identifying types of ambrosia beetle damage.J. Econ. Entomol. 50:213.
Klimetzek, D., Köhler, J., Vité, J.P., andKohnle, U. 1986. Dosage response to ethanol mediates host selection by “secondary” bark beetles.Naturwissenschaften 73:270–272.
Kolb, B. 1982. Multiple headspace extraction-A procedure for eliminating the influence of the sample matrix in quantitative headspace gas chromatography.Chromatographia 15:587–594.
Kolb, B., Pospisil, P., andAuer, M. 1984. Quantitative headspace analysis of solid samples; a classification of various sample types.Chromatographia 19:113–122.
Lindelöw, Å., Risberg, B., andSjödin, K. 1992. Attraction during flight of scolytids and other bark- and wood-dwelling beetles to volatiles from fresh and stored spruce wood.Can. J. For. Res. 22:224–228.
Lindgren, B.S., Borden, J.H., Gray, D.R., Lee, P.C., Palmer, D.A., andChong, L. 1982. Evaluation of two trap log techniques for ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in timber processing areas.J. Econ. Entomol. 75:577–586.
Liu, Y.-B., andMcLean, J.A. 1989. Field evaluation of responses ofGnathotrichus sulcatus andG. retusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to semiochemicals.J. Econ. Entomol. 82:1687–1690.
MacDonald, R.C., andKimmerer, T.W. 1991. Ethanol in the stems of trees.Physiol. Plant. 82:582–588.
McLean, J.A., andBorden, J.H. 1977. Attack byGnathotrichus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on stumps and felled trees baited with sulcatol and ethanol.Can. Entomol. 109:675–686.
Moeck, H.A. 1970. Ethanol as the primary attractant for the ambrosia beetleTrypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 102:985–995.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., andKutner, M.H. 1989. Applied Linear Regression Models, 2nd ed. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois.
Nijholt, W.W., andShönherr, J. 1976. Chemical response behavior of scolytids in west Germany and western Canada.Environ. Canada For. Serv. Bi-Mon. Res. Notes 32:31–32.
Prebble, M.L., andGraham, K. 1957. Studies of attack by ambrosia beetles in softwood logs on Vancouver Island, British Columbia.For. Sci. 3:90–112.
Roberts, J.K.M., Callis, J., Wemmer, D., Walbot, V., andJardetzky, O. 1984. Mechanism of cytoplasmic pH regulation in hypoxic maize root tips and its role in survival under hypoxia.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81:3379–3383.
Salom, S.M., andMcLean, J.A. 1990. Flight and landing behavior ofTrypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in response to different semiochemicals.J. Chem. Ecol. 16:2589–2604.
SASInstitute Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT user's guide. Release 6.03 Ed. Cary, North Carolina.
Schroeder, L.M., andLindelöw, Å. 1989. Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of α-pinene and ethanol.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:807–817.
Schowalter, T.D., Caldwell, B.A., Carpenter, S.E., Griffiths, R.P., Harmon, M.E., Ingham, E.R., Kelsey, R.G., Lattin, J.D., andMoldenke, A.R. 1992. Decomposition of fallen trees: Effects of initial conditions and heterotroph colonization rates, pp. 371–381,in K.P. Singh and J.S. Singh (eds.). Tropical Ecosystems: Ecology and Management. Wiley Eastern, New Delhi.
Shore, T.L., andMcLean, J.A. 1983. A further evaluation of the interactions between the pheromones and two host kairomones of the ambrosia beetleTrypodendron lineatum andGnathotrichus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 115:1–5.
Vité, J.P., andBakke, A. 1979. Synergism between chemical and physical stimuli in host colonization by an ambrosia beetle.Naturwissenschaften 66:528–529.
Zhong, H., andSchowalter, T.D. 1989. Conifer bole utilization by wood-boring beetles in western Oregon.Can. J. For. Res. 19:943–947.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelsey, R.G. Ethanol and ambrosia beetles in Douglas fir logs with and without branches. J Chem Ecol 20, 3307–3319 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033728
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033728