Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of biotic and abiotic stress on induced accumulation of terpenes and phenolics in red pines inoculated with bark beetle-vectored fungus

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study characterized the chemical response of healthy red pine to artificial inoculation with the bark beetle-vectored fungusLeptographium terebrantis. In addition, we sought to determine whether stress altered this induced response and to understand the implications of these interactions to the study of decline diseases. Twenty-five-year-old trees responded to mechanical wounding or inoculation withL. terebrantis by producing resinous reaction lesions in the phloem. Aseptically wounded and wound-inoculated phloem contained higher concentrations of phenolics than did constitutive tissue. Trees inoculated withL. terebrantis also contained higher concentrations of six monoterpenes,α-pinene,β-pinene, 3-carene, limonene, camphene, and myrcene, and higher total monoterpenes than did trees that were mechanically wounded or left unwounded. Concentrations of these monoterpenes increased with time after inoculation. Total phenolic concentrations in unwounded stem tissue did not differ between healthy and root-diseased trees. Likewise, constitutive monoterpene concentrations in stem phloem were similar between healthy and root-diseased trees. However, when stem phloem tissue was challenged with fungal inoculations, reaction tissue from root-diseased trees contained lower concentrations ofα-pinene, the predominant monoterpene in red pine, than did reaction tissue from healthy trees. Seedlings stressed by exposure to low light levels exhibited less extensive induced chemical changes when challenge inoculated withL. terebrantis than did seedlings growing under higher light. Stem phloem tissue in these seedlings contained lower concentrations ofα-pinene than did nonstressed seedlings also challenge inoculated withL. terebrantis. It is hypothesized that monoterpenes and phenolics play a role in the defensive response of red pine against insect-fungal attack, that stress may predispose red pine to attack by insect-fungal complexes, and that such interactions are involved in red pine decline disease. Implications to plant defense theory and interactions among multiple stress agents in forest decline are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abacus Concepts. 1989. SuperANOVA. Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordasch, R.P., andBerryman, A.A. 1977. Host resistance to the fir engraver beetle,Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) 2. Repellancy ofAbies grandis resins and some monoterpenes.Can. Entomol. 109:95–100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, J.R. 1987. Effects of terpenoid compounds on growth of symbiotic fungi associated with the southern pine beetle.Phytopathology 77:83–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cates, R.G., andAlexander, H. 1982. Host resistance and susceptibility, pp. 212–263,in J.B. Mitton and K.B. Sturgeon (eds.). Bark Beetles in North American Conifers. A.P.S. Press, St. Paul, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, E., andEricsson, A. 1986. Starch reserves inPicea abies in relation to defense reaction against a bark beetle transmitted blue-stain fungus,Ceratocystis polonica.Can. J. For. Res. 16:78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, F.W., Jr., Krstic, M., Zavarin, E., andBarber, H.W., Jr. 1968. Inhibitory effects of volatile oleoresin components onFomes annosus and fourCeratocystis species.Phytopathology 58:1327–1335.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S.P., andHain, F.P. 1986. Defensive mechanisms of loblolly and shortleaf pine against attack by sourthern pine beetle,Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and its fungal associate,Ceratocystis minor (Hedgecock) Hunt.J. Chem. Ecol. 12:1397–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J.F., andLott, L.H. 1976. Toxicity of substances in pine oleoresin to southern pine beetles.J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 11:301–305.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot, R.C. 1972. Growth of wood-inhabiting fungi in saturated atmospheres of monoterpenoids.Mycologia 64:863–870.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delorme, L., andLieutier, F. 1990. Monoterpene composition of the preformed and induced resins of Scots pine, and their effect on bark beetles and associated fungi.Eur. J. For. Pathol. 20:304–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entry, J.A., Cromack, K., Jr., Hansen, E., andWaring, R. 1991. Response of western coniferous seedlings to infection byArmillaria ostoyae under limited light and nitrogen.Phytopathology 81:89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenzon, J. 1994. Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants.J. Chem. Ecol. 20:1281–1328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gijzen, M. Lewinsohn, E., andCroteau, R. 1991. Characterization of the constitutive and wound-inducible monoterpene cyclases.Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 289:267–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, E. 1961. The formation of pinosylvin and its monomethyl ether in the sapwood ofPinus resinosa Ait.Can. J. Bot. 39:1765–1772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julkunen-Tijto, R. 1985. Phenolic constituents in the leaves of northern willows: Methods for the analysis of certain phenolics.J. Agric. Food Chem. 33:213–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey, R.G., andHarmon, M.E. 1989. Distribution and variation of extractable total phenols and tannins in the logs of four conifers after 1 year on the ground.Can. J. For. Res. 19:1030–1036.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R.M., andPerkins, T.D. 1988. Primary and secondary causes and consequences of contemporary forest decline.Bot. Rev. 54:1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepzig, K.D. 1994. Interactions of stress, plant chemical defenses and subcortical insect-fungal complexes in red pine decline. PhD dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison. 246 pp.

  • Klepzig, K.D., Raffa, K.F., andSmalley, E.B. 1991. Association of an insect-fungal complex with red pine decline in Wisconsin.For. Sci. 37:1119–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewinsohn, E., Gijzen, M., Savage, T.J., andCroteau, R. 1991a. Defense mechanisms of conifers: Relationships of monoterpene cyclase activity to anatomical specialization and oleoresin monoterpene content.Plant Physiol. 96:38–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewinsohn, E., Guzen, M., andCroteau, R. 1991b. Defense mechanisms of conifers: Differences in constitutive and wound-induced monoterpene biosynthesis among species.Plant Physiol. 96:44–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lerdau, M., Litvak, M., andMonson, R. 1994. Plant chemical defense: Monoterpenes and the growth-differentiation balance hypothesis.Tree 9:58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieutier, F. 1993. Induced defense reaction of conifers to bark beetles and their associated Ophiostoma species, pp. 225–233,in M.J. Wingfield, K.A. Seifert, and J.F. Webber (eds.).Ceratocystis andOphiostoma: Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathogenicity. A.P.S. Press, St. Paul, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorio, P.L. 1986. Growth-differentiation balance: A basis for understanding southern pine beetle-tree interactions.For. Ecol. Manage. 14:259–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorio, P.L., andHodges, J.D. 1968. Microsite effects on oleoresin pressure of large loblolly pines.Ecology 49:1207–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manion, P.D. 1991. Tree Disease Concepts, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 402 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebeker, T.E., Hodges, J.D., andBlanche, C.A. 1993. Host response to bark beetle and pathogen colonization, pp. 225–233,in T.D. Schowalter, and G.M. Filip (eds.). Beetle-Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevill, R.J., andAlexander, S.A. 1992. Transmission ofLeptographium procerum to eastern white pine byHylobius pales andPissodes nemorensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).Plant Dis. 76:307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oren, R., Schulze, E.-D. Werk, K.S., Meyer, J., Schneider, B.V., andHilmeis, H. 1988. Performance of twoPicea abies (L.) Karst. stands at different stages of decline: I. Carbon relations and stand growth.Oecologia 75:25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, T.D., andStephen, F.M. 1987. Influence of tree stresses and site quality on the induced defensive system of loblolly pine.Can. J. For. Res. 17:569–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, T.D., Blanche, C.A., Nebeker, T.E., andStephen, F.M. 1987. Composition of loblolly pine resin defenses: Comparison of monoterpenes from induced lesion and sapwood resin.Can. J. For. Res. 17:1202–1206.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raffa, K.F., andBerryman, A.A. 1982. Accumulation of monoterpenes and associated volatiles following fungal inoculation of grand fir with a fungus vectored by the fir engraverScolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 114:797–810.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raffa, K.F., andBerryman, A.A. 1983. Physiological aspects of lodgepole pine wound responses to a fungal symbiont of the mountain pine beetle,Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 115:723–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffa, K.F., andHall, D.J. 1988. Seasonal activities of the pine root collar weevil,Hylobius radicis Buchanan (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in red pine stands undergoing decline.Great Lakes Entomol. 21:69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffa, K.R., andKlepzig, K.D. 1995. Effects of root inhabiting insect-fungal complexes on aspects of host resistance to bark beetles,in W. Mattson and P. Niemela (eds.). Mechanisms of Woody Plant Defenses against Herbivores. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-, North Central Experiment Station. St. Paul, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffa, K. R., andSmalley, E.B. 1995. Interaction of pre-attack and induced monoterpenes in conifer defense against bark beetle-fungal complexes.Oecologia. In press.

  • Raffa K.F., andSteffeck, R.J. 1988. Computation of response factors for quantitative analysis of monoterpenes by gas-liquid chromatography.J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1385–1390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raffa, K.F., Berryman, A.A., Simasko, J., Teal, W., andWong, B.L. 1985. Effects of grand fir monoterpenes on the fir engraver,Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), and its symbiotic fungus.Environ. Entomol. 14:552–556.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C.E., andBerryman, A.A. 1976. Host resistance to the fir engraver beetle. 1. Monoterpene composition ofAbies grandis pitch blisters and fungus-infected wounds.Can. J. Bot. 54:14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shain, L. 1967. Resistance of sapwood in stems of loblolly pine to infection byFomes annosus.Phytopathology 57:1034–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrimpton, D.M., andWhitney, H.S. 1968. Inhibition of growth of blue stain fungi by wood extractives.Can. J. Bot. 46:757–761.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.H. 1963. Toxicity of pine resin vapors to three species ofDendroctonus bark beetles.J. Econ. Entomol. 56:827–831.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, R.A., andIllman, B.L. 1994. Response of Lutz, Sitka, and white spruce to attack byDendroctonus rufipennis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and blue stain fungi.Environ. Entomol. 23:472–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. 1933. A cork-borer method for inoculating trees.Phytopathology, 23:487–488.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

To whom correspondence should be addressed at USDA Forest Service, 2500 Shreveport Hwy., Pineville, Louisiana 71360.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klepzig, K.D., Kruger, E.L., Smalley, E.B. et al. Effects of biotic and abiotic stress on induced accumulation of terpenes and phenolics in red pines inoculated with bark beetle-vectored fungus. J Chem Ecol 21, 601–626 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033704

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033704

Key Words

Navigation