Abstract
Responses of house mice (Mus domesticus) to odors in live traps were studied in a series of eight 0.1-ha outdoor field enclosures. It was assumed that the most recent mouse capture would provide the predominant odor in a trap for at least one week. Three different populations were tested, one in 1989 and two in 1992, involving over 800 different mice. Similar response patterns were recorded from all three groups. Two types of questions were tested: (1) Were there any biases contingent upon what had been previously caught? (2) Were there consistent responses of mice of particular age, sex, or reproductive classes to trap odors? Traps soiled by juvenile females caught adult females significantly less often than expected, but there were no consistent relationships in terms of the effects of specific residual odors on the subsequent capture at a particular trap. For various age, sex, and reproductive classes, (1) adult males preferred odors from juvenile and estrous females and avoided odors of other males significantly more than expected, (2) juvenile females selected traps with odors of other juvenile females and avoided all other types of female odors significantly more than expected, (3) nonestrous females exhibited a significant preference for adult male odor, and (4) estrous females selected traps containing odors from adult males but avoided those that had previously contained either nonestrous or pregnant/lactating females significantly more than expected. These findings have potential implications with regard to both the methods used for trapping small rodents and the social biology of house mice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, P.K., andHill, J.L. 1965.Mus musculus: Induction of territory formation.Science 148:1753–1755.
Barnett, S.A. 1963. The Rat: A Study of Behaviour. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Boonstra, R., andKrebs, C.J. 1976. The effect of odour on trap response inMicrotus townsendii.J. Zool. London 180:467–476.
Bronson, F.H. 1979. The reproductive ecology of the house mouse.Q. Rev. Biol. 54:265–299.
Bronson, F.H., andMarsden, H.M. 1964. Male-induced synchrony of estrus in deermice.Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 4:634–637.
Crowcroft, P. 1973. Mice All Over. Chicago Zoological Park, Brookfield, Illinois.
Daly, M., Wilson, M.J., andBehrends, P. 1980. Factors affecting rodents' responses to odours of strangers encountered in the field: Experiments with odour-baited traps.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 6:323–329.
Doty, R.L. 1972. Odor preferences of femalePeromyscus maniculatus bairdi for male mouse odors ofP. m. bairdi andP. leucopus noveboracensis as a function of the estrous cycle.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 81:191–197.
Doty, R.L. 1973. Reactions of deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) to homospecific and heterospecific urine odors.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 84:296–303.
Drickamer, L.C. 1984. Captures of two species ofPeromyscus at live traps baited with male and female odors.J. Mammal. 65:699–702.
Drickamer, L.C. 1986. Puberty-influencing chemosignals in mice: Ecological and evolutionary considerations, pp. 441–455,in D. Duvall, D. Müller-Schwarze, and R.M. Silverstein (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates IV. Plenum Press, New York.
Drickamer, L.C. 1992. Oestrous female house mice discriminate dominant from subordinate males and sons of dominant from sons of subordinate males by odour cues.Anim. Behav. 43:868–870.
Drickamer, L.C., andMikesic, D.G. 1990. Urinary chemosignals, reproduction, and population size for house mice (Mus domesticus) living in field enclosures.J. Chem. Ecol. 16:2955–2968.
Drickamer, L.C., Mikesic, D.G., andShaffer, K.S. 1992. Use of odor baits in traps to test reactions to intra- and interspecific chemical cues in house mice living in outdoor enclosures.J. Chem. Ecol. 18:2223–2250.
Dunn, L.C. 1960. Introduction of a lethal allele into a feral mouse population.Am. Nat. 98:57–64.
Ferguson, B., Fuentes, S.M., Sawrey, D.K., andDewsbury, D.A. 1986. Male preferences for unmated versus mated females in two species of voles (Microtus ochrogaster andM. montanus).J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 100:243–247.
Galef, B.G., Jr., andClark, M.M. 1971. Social factors in the poison avoidance and feeding behavior of wild and domesticated rat pups.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 75:341–357.
Galef, B.G., andStein, M. 1985. Demonstrator influence on observer diet preference: Analyses of critical social interactions and olfactory signals.Anim. Learn. Behav. 13:31–38.
Gurnell, J., andLittle, J. 1992. The influence of trap residual odour on catching woodland rodents.Anim. Behav. 43:623–632.
Heske, E.J. 1987. Responses of a population of California voles,Microtus californicus, to odorbaited traps.J. Mammal. 68:64–72.
Hurst, J.L. 1989. The complex network of olfactory communication in populations of wild house mice,Mus musculus Rutty: Urine marking and investigations within family groups.Anim. Behav. 37:705–725.
Hurst, J.L. 1990a. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice,Mus musculus Rutty. I. Communication between males.Anim. Behav. 40:209–222.
Hurst, J.L. 1990b. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice,Mus musculus Rutty. II. Communication between females.Anim. Behav. 40:223–232.
Hurst, J.L. 1990c. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice,Mus musculus Rutty. III. Communication between the sexes.Anim. Behav. 40:233–243.
King, J.A. 1983. Seasonal dispersal in a semi-natural population ofPeromyscus maniculatus.Can. J. Zool. 61:2740–2750.
Mazdzer, E., Capone, M.R., andDrickamer, L.C. 1976. Conspecific odors and trappability of deer mice (Peromyscus leucopus noveboracensis).J. Mammal. 57:607–609.
McClintock, M.K. 1983. Pheronomal regulation of the ovarian cycle: Enhancement, suppression, and synchrony, pp. 113–150,in J. Vandenbergh (ed.). Pheromones and Mammalian Reproduction. Academic Press, New York.
Mikesic, D.G., andDrickamer, L.C. 1992. Factors affecting home-range size in house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) living in outdoor enclosures.Am. Mid. Nat. 127:31–40.
Montgomery, W.I. 1987. The application of capture-mark-recapture methods to the enumeration of small mammal populations.Symp. Zool. Soc. London 58:25–57.
Sokal, R.R., andRohlf, F.J. 1981. Biometry, 2nd ed. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Stoddart, D.M. 1982. Does trap odour influence estimation of population size of the short-tailed vole,Microtus agrestis.J. Anim. Ecol. 51:375–386.
Ury, H.K. 1976. A comparison of four procedures for multiple comparisons among means (pairwise contrasts) for arbitrary sample sizes.Technometrics 18:89–97.
Vandenbergh, J.G. 1983. Pheromonal regulation of puberty, pp. 95–112,in J. Vandenbergh (ed.). Pheromones and Mammalian Reproduction. Academic Press, New York.
Vandenbergh, J.G., andCoppola, D.M. 1986. The physiology and ecology of puberty modulation by primer pheromones.Adv. Stud. Behav. 16:71–108.
Whitten, W.K. 1956. Modification of the oestrous cycle of the mouse by external stimuli associated with the male.J. Endocrinol. 13:399–404.
Wolff, J.O., andJohnson, M.F. 1979. Scent marking in taiga voles.J. Mammal. 60:400–403.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drickamer, L.C. Odors in traps: Does most recent occupant influence capture rates for house mice?. J Chem Ecol 21, 541–555 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033700
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033700