Skip to main content
Log in

Augmenting the house of quality with engineering models

  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To develop successful products the “Voice of the Customer” must be explicitly considered in the design process. The House of Quality (HOQ) is an increasingly popular structured methodology for ensuring customer focus. Two important steps of the product development process in which the HOQ is used are (1) setting engineering targets and (2) identifying the inherent tradeoffs in a design. We believe that these two activities cannot be performed reliably in actual practice unless the HOQ is used in conjunction with objective engineering models of product performance. In this paper, we substantiate this claim using an example drawn from a real design project. The potential benefits of augmenting the HOQ with engineering models are explained and a single representation which facilitates their combined use is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Charniak, E.; Riesbeck, C.K.; McDermott, D.Artificial Intelligence Programming. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta, A.K.; Brockoff, K.; Weisenfeld, U. Making Trade-Offs in the New Product Development Process: A German/US Comparison.Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, March 1992.

  3. Griffin, A.; Hauser, J.R. The Marketing and R&D Interface. Technical Report, November 1992.

  4. Gupta, A.K.; Raj, S.P.; Wilemon, D. R&D-Marketing Dialogue in High Tech Firms.Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 50, No. 2, 1986, pp. 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hauser, J.R.; Clausing, D. The House of Quality.Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66, No. 3, May–June 1988, pp. 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hise, R.T.; O'Neal, L.; McNeal, J.U.; Parasuraman, A. The Effect of Product Design Activities on Commercial Success Levels of New Industrial Products.Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1989, pp. 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lise, R.T.; O'Neal, L.; Parasuraman, A.; McNeal, J.U. Marketing/R&D Interaction in New Product Development: Implications for New Product Success Rates.Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1990, pp. 142–155.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cordless drill advertisement.Popular Mechanics, p.85, October 1992.

  9. Randolph, S.E. What Smart Companies are Doing in New Product Development. Center for Product Development, Arthur D. Little, 1989.

  10. Rabino, S.; Moskowitz, H. Detecting Buyer Preference to Guide Product Development.Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1984, pp. 140–151.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ramaswamy, R.; Ulrich, K.T.; Kishi, N.; Tomikashi, M. Sloving Parametric Design Problems Requiring Configuration Choices.ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 115, No. 1, March 1993, pp. 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Souder, W.; Chakrabarti, A.K. The R&D/Marketing Interface: Results from an Empirical Study of Innovation Products.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 25, No. 4, 1978, pp. 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Urban, G.L.; Hauser, J.R.Design and Marketing of New Products. Prentice-Hall, 1980.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramaswamy, R., Ulrich, K. Augmenting the house of quality with engineering models. Research in Engineering Design 5, 70–79 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032576

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032576

Keywords

Navigation