Skip to main content
Log in

Additive representations of non-additive measures and the choquet integral

  • Modeling Beliefs and Preferences
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies some new properties of set functions (and, in particular, “non-additive probabilities” or “capacities”) and the Choquet integral with respect to such functions, in the case of a finite domain.

We use an isomorphism between non-additive measures on the original space (of states of the world) and additive ones on a larger space (of events), and embed the space of real-valued functions on the former in the corresponding space on the latter. This embedding gives rise to the following results:

  • the Choquet integral with respect to any totally monotone capacity is an average over minima of the integrand;

  • the Choquet integral with respect to any capacity is the difference between minima of regular integrals over sets of additive measures;

  • under fairly general conditions one may define a “Radon-Nikodym derivative” of one capacity with respect to another;

  • the “optimistic” pseudo-Bayesian update of a non-additive measure follows from the Bayesian update of the corresponding additive measure on the larger space.

We also discuss the interpretation of these results and the new light they shed on the theory of expected utility maximization with respect to non-additive measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Allais, Le comportemenet de l'homme rationel devant le risque: critique des postulates et axioms de l'école américaine, Econometrica 21 (1953) 503–546.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F.J. Anscombe and R.J. Aumann, A definition of subjective probability, Ann. Math. Statist. 34 (1963) 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.J. Aumann and L.S. Shapley,Values for Non-Atomic Games (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Ben Porath and I. Gilboa, Linear measures, the Gini index and the income-equality tradeoff, J. Econ. Theory (1991), to appear.

  5. T. Bewley, Knightian decision theory: part I, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 807, Yale University (1986).

  6. G. Choquet, Theory of capacities, Ann. de l'Institut Fourier 5 (1953–54) 131–295.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. de Finetti, La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives, Ann. de l'Institute Henri Poincaré 7(1937) 1–68. (Translated by H.E. Kyburg in Kyburg and Smokler (1964).)

  8. A.P. Dempster, Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping, Ann. Math. Statist. 38 (1967) 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.P. Dempster, A generalization of Bayesian inference, J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Series B 30 (1968) 205–247.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Denneberg, Subadditive measures and integral, mimeo (1990).

  11. J. Dow and S.R.C. Werlang, Risk aversion, uncertainty aversion and the optimal choice of portfolio, London Business School Working Paper (1990).

  12. J. Dow and S.R.C. Werlang, Nash equilibrium under Knightian uncertainty: breaking down backward induction, mimeo (1991).

  13. J. Dow, V. Madrigal and S.R.C. Werlang, Preferences, common knowledge and speculative trade, Fundacao Getulio Vargas Working Paper (1989).

  14. D. Dubois and H. Prade, Evidence measures based on fuzzy information, Automatica 21 (1985) 547–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Dubois and H. Prade, Théorie des possibilités et modèles décisionnels, Rapport L.S.I. No. 242 (1986).

  16. D. Dubois and H. Prade, Focusing versus updating in belief function theory, in:Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, eds. M. Fedrizzi, J. Kacprzyk and R.R. Yager (Wiley, 1991).

  17. D. Dubois, H. Prade and A. Ramer, Updating, focusing and information measures in belief function theory, Rapport IRIT/91–94/R (1991).

  18. R. Dyckerhoff and K. Mosler, Stochastic dominance with nonadditive probabilities, mimeo (1990).

  19. D. Ellsberg, Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms, Quart. J. Econ. 75 (1961) 643–669.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L.G. Epstein and T. Wang, Intertemporal asset pricing under Knightian uncertainty, Econometrica 62 (1994) 283–322.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Fagin and J.Y. Halpern, A new approach to updating beliefs, in:Proc. 6th Conf. on Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, MA (1990) pp. 317–325.

  22. P.C. Fishburn,Utility Theory for Decision Making (Wiley, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  23. I. Gilboa, Expected utility theory with purely subjective non-additive probabilities, J. Math. Econ. 16 (1987) 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. I. Gilboa, Expectation and variation in multi-period decisions, Econometrica 57 (1989) 1153–1169.

    Google Scholar 

  25. I. Gilboa, Additivizations of non-additive measures, Math. Oper. Res. 14 (1989) 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. I. Gilboa, Duality in non-additive expected utility theory, Ann. Oper. Res. 19 (1989) 405–414.

    Google Scholar 

  27. I. Gilboa and E. Lehrer, Global games, Int. J. Game Theory 20 (1991) 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. I. Gilboa and D. Schmeidler, Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior, J. Math. Econ. 18 (1989) 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. I. Gilboa and D. Schmeidler, Updating ambiguous beliefs, J. Econ. Theory 53 (1993) 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. I. Gilboa and D. Schmeidler, Canonical representation of set functions, Math. Oper. Res., to appear.

  31. J.Y. Halpern and R. Fagin, Two views of beliefs: beliefs as generalized probability and beliefs as evidence, Art. Int. 54 (1992) 275–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. P.J. Huber and V. Strassen, Minimax tests and the Neyman-Pearson lemma for capacities, Ann. Statist. 1 (1973) 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  33. P.J. Huber, The use of Choquet capacities in statistics, Bull. Int. Inst. Statist. 45 (1973) 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J.-Y. Jaffray, Linear utility theory for belief functions, Oper. Res. Lett. 8 (1989) 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. J.-Y. Jaffray, Bayesian updating and belief functions, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. (1992), to appear.

  36. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47 (1979) 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  37. B. Lipman, private communication (1992).

  38. M. Machina, Choice under uncertainty: problems solved and unsolved, Econ. Perspectives 1 (1987) 121–154.

    Google Scholar 

  39. F.P. Ramsey, Truth and probability, in:The Foundation of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, ed. F.P. Ramsey (Harcourt, Brace and Co., New York, 1931).

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. Rosenmuller, On Core and value, Meth. Oper. Res. 9 (1971) 84–104.

    Google Scholar 

  41. J. Rosenmuller, Some properties of convex set functions, part II, Meth. Oper. Res. 17 (1972) 287–307.

    Google Scholar 

  42. R. Sarin and P.P. Wakker, A simple axiomatization of nonadditive expected utility, Econometrica 60 (1992) 1255–1272).

    Google Scholar 

  43. L.J. Savage,The Foundations of Statistics (Wiley, New York, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  44. D. Schmeidler, Subjective probability without additivity (temporary title), Working paper, Foerder Institute for Economic Research, Tel Aviv University (1982).

  45. D. Schmeidler, Nonadditive probabilities and convex games, mimeo (1984).

  46. D. Schmeidler, Integral representation without additivity, Proc. AMS 97 (1986) 253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  47. D. Schmeidler, Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity, Econometrica 57 (1985) 571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  48. G. Shafer,A Mathematical Theory of Evidence (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  49. L.S. Shapley, Notes onn-person games VII: cores of convex games, The Rand Corporation R. M. (1965); also as Cores of convex games, Int. J. Game Theory 1 (1971) 12–26.

    Google Scholar 

  50. M.H. Simonsen and S.R.C. Werlang, Subadditive probabilities and portfolio inertia, mimeo (1990).

  51. P. Smets, The degree of belief in a fuzzy event, Inf. Sci. 25 (1981) 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern,Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  53. P. Wakker, Continuous subjective expected utility with non-additive probabilities, J. Math. Econ. 18 (1989) 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. P. Wakker, private communication (1990).

  55. P. Walley and T. Fine, Towards a frequentist theory of upper and lower probabilities, Ann. Statist. 10 (1982) 741–761.

    Google Scholar 

  56. P. Walley, Belief function representation of statistical evidence, Ann. Statist. 15 (1987) 1439–1465.

    Google Scholar 

  57. L.A. Wasserman, Belief functions and statistical inference, Can. J. Statist. 18 (1990) 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  58. L.A. Wasserman and J. Kadane, Bayes's theorem for Choquet capacities, Ann. Statist. 18 (1990) 1328–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  59. K.R. Yoo, A theory of the underpricing of initial public offerings, mimeo (1990).

  60. K.R. Yoo, The iterative law of expectation and non-additive probability measure, Econ. Lett. 37 (1991) 145–149.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We wish to thank Elchanan Ben-Porath, Dieter Denneberg, Didier Dubois, Gerald Hanweck, Jean-Yves Jaffray, Ehud Kalai, Morton Kamien, Ehud Lehrer, and two anonymous referees for comments and discussions. We are especially grateful to Bart Lipman who pointed out to us a few mistakes in an earlier version. NSF Grants Nos. SES-9113108 (Gilboa) and SES-9111873 (Schmeidler) are gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D. Additive representations of non-additive measures and the choquet integral. Ann Oper Res 52, 43–65 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032160

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032160

Keywords

Navigation