Skip to main content
Log in

The planning of headways in urban public transit

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A basic issue in the planning of urban public transport is the determination of headways or inter-dispatch times. During each season, i.e. distinct time-period whose demand characteristics are constant, the following tradeoff must be considered. Dispatching too many vehicles on a route causes high operating costs, while too few vehicles may result in unsatisfactory levels of service. An appropriate policy on headways will help to balance resources between lines (routes) in peak-demand hours and will influence the total number of buses acquired by a transit company. Previous practice in industry usually bases the planning of headways upon satisfying service criteria on a “most-congested segment”. This approach reduces the problem from that of studying a route to that of a single segment (stop), but thereby fails to account for other important information about the line's characteristics. In this article, we develop two new service criteria which consider the line as a whole: (1) “crowding-over-distance” takes into account discomfort resulting from a vehicle carrying too many passengers, and the corresponding distance travelled; and (2) “probability-of-failure”, the frequency with which a waiting passenger fails to board due to lack of space. COD will be analyzed using simulation. POF will be related to a time-dependent Markov chain that is “inhomogeneous” in terms of distance along the route. Optimal headways are those which dispatch the smallest number of buses while meeting the particular service criterion. Models based on each of the two criteria are illustrated and applied to a number of routes of the Israeli transit company, DAN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Adamski, Probabilistic models of passenger service processes at bus stops, Transp. Res. 26B(1992)253–259.

    Google Scholar 

  2. O. Adebisi, A mathematical model for headway variance of fixed-route buses, Transp. Res. 20B(1986)59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.A. Andersson and G.P. Scalia-Tomba, Statistical analysis of an urban bus route, Report LiTHMAT-R-78-11, Department of Mathematics, Linköping Institute of Technology (1978).

  4. A. Ceder, Computer application for determining buses and timetables, in:Advances in Bus Service Planning Practices, Record 1011 (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1985) pp. 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Ceder, Bus frequency determination using passenger count data, Transp. Res. 18A(1987)439–453.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S.K. Chang and P.M. Schonfeld, Multiple period optimization of bus transit systems, Transp. Res. 25B(1991)453–478.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.A.Chapman, H.E. Gault and I.A. Jenkins, Factors affecting the operation of urban bus routes, Research Report No. 23, TORG University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne (1976).

  8. E. Çinlar,Introduction to Stochastic Processes (Prentice-Hall, 1975).

  9. P.G. Furth and N.H.M. Wilson, Setting frequencies on bus routes: Theory and practice, Transp. Res. Record 818(1981)1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Kocur and C. Henderson, Design of local bus service with demand equilibrium, Transp. Sci. 16(1982)149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G.K. Kuah and J. Perl, Optimization of feeder bus routes and bus stop spacing, J. Transp. Eng. 114(1988)341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G.F. Newell, Dispatching policies for a transportation route, Transp. Sci. 5(1971)91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.H. Oldfield and P.H. Bly, An analytic investigation of optimal bus size, Transp. Res. 22B(1988)319–337.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W.B. Powell and Y. Sheffi, A probabilistic model of bus route performance, Transp. Sci. 17(1983)376–404.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y.J. Stephanedes, P.G. Michalopoulos and T. Bountis, Dynamic transit scheduling under efficiency constraints, Transp. Res. 19B(1985)95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Tam and P. Seneviratne, Computer simulation model for bus service analysis, presented atTransportation Research Board, 1989 annual meeting, Washington, DC.

  17. J. Woodhull, J. Simon and D.A. Shoemaker, Goals for bus transit scheduling, in:Advances in Bus Service Planning Practices, Record 1011 (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1985) pp. 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The preparation of this paper was partially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Grant No. OGP 05292.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grosfeld-Nir, A., Bookbinder, J.H. The planning of headways in urban public transit. Ann Oper Res 60, 145–160 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02031944

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02031944

Keywords

Navigation