Skip to main content
Log in

Use of terrestrial arthropod prey by a stream-dwelling cyprinid fish

  • Full Papers
  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

The spatio-temporal availability to, and use of terrestrial (allochthonous) prey by, a subset of the fish assemblage of a Virginia piedmont stream were investigated during spring and summer. Terrestrial invertebrates were most abundant in drift nets, but least common in fish stomachs, during April. In contrast, during August, terrestrial prey dominated the diet of the major cyprinid fish,Notropis ardens, even though terrestrial prey availability in the stream declined by an order of magnitude. Several other co-occurring fishes only rarely consumed prey of terrestrial origin. Drifting terrestrial invertebrates, were concentrated at the surface near the thalweg, compared to stream margin or substrate locations. This study suggests that morphologial and behavioral constraints of individual fish taxa, including predator avoidance responses, regulate the use of terrestrial prey within a given fish assemblage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Angermeier, P. L. 1985. Spatio-temporal patterns of foraging success for fishes in an Illinois stream. Amer. Midl. Nat. 114: 342–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angermeier, P. L. & J. R. Karr. 1983. Fish communities along environmental gradients in a system of tropical streams. Env. Biol. Fish. 9: 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. A. & S. T. Ross. 1981. Spatial and temporal resource utilization by southeastern cyprinids. Copeia 1981: 178–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S. H. 1979. A nutritional constraint in herbivory by fishes: a stunted population ofSarotherodon mossambicus (Peters) in Lake Sibaya. Ecol. Monogr. 49: 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerri, R. D. & D. F. Fraser. 1983. Predation and risk in foraging minnows: balancing conflicting demands. Amer. Nat. 121: 552–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, P. A., D. M. Lodge, J. R. Hodgson & P. G. Knapik. 1988. Diets of syntopic fine scale dace,Phoxinus neogaeus, and northern redbelly dace,Phoxinus eos: a reflection of trophic morphology. Env. Biol. Fish. 22: 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, D. A., C. S. Gist, W. W. Hargrove, L. S. Risley, T. O. Schowalter & T. R. Seastedt. 1988. Foliage consumption and nutrient dynamics in canopy insects. pp. 193–205.In: W. T. Swank & D. A. Crossley (ed.) Forest Ecology and Hydrology at Coweeta, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, J. P. 1980. Diets of mountain whitefish,Prosopium williamsoni, and brook trout,Salvelinus fontinalis in the Little Walker River, Mono County, California. Calif. Fish and Game 66: 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. L. & W. D. Pearson. 1987. Patterns of resource utilization among four species of darters in three central Kentucky streams. pp. 69–76.In: W. J. Matthews & D. C. Heims (ed.) Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furukawa-Tanaka, T. 1985. The ecology of salmonid fishes in Japanese mountain streams. Jap. J. Ecol. 35: 481–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garman, G. C. 1984. Initial effects of deforestation on aquatic community structure and function of the East Branch Piscataquis River, Maine. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Maine, Orono. 105 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garman, G. C. & L. A. Smock. 1988. James River investigation report. U. S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Proj. F-74-R. 78 pp.

  • Gatz, A. J. 1979. Ecological morphology of freshwater stream fishes. Tulane Stud. Zool. Bot. 21: 91–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, O. T. 1987. Habitat segregation in an assemblage of minnows in an Ozark stream. pp. 33–41.In: W. J. Matthews & D. C. Heims (ed.) Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. D. & M. C. Freeman. 1987. Microhabitat use in a stream fish assemblage. J. Zool., Lond. 212: 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. L. 1975. Use of terrestrial invertebrates as food by salmonids. pp. 137–152.In: A. D. Hasler (ed.) Coupling of Land and Water Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N. 1970. The ecology of running waters. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. 555 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. H. & E. Z. Johnson. 1982. Diel foraging in relation to available prey in an Adirondack mountain stream. Hydrobiologia 96: 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, A. & D. Webb. 1966. Mouth and body form relative to feeding ecology in the fish fauna of a small lake, Lake Opinicon, Ontario. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 23: 1845–1874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotrich, V. A. 1973. Growth, production, and community composition of fishes inhabiting a first-, second-, and third-order stream of eastern Kentucky. Ecol. Monogr. 43: 377–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe-McConnell, R. H. 1964. The fishes of the Rupununi savanna district of British Guiana, South America. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool. 45: 103–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A. E. & T. J. Pitcher. 1983. Foraging timidity, and shoal size in minnows and goldfish. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12: 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. F. & S. M. MacDonald. 1982. The input of terrestrial invertebrates from three canopies to a stream. Freshw. Biol. 12: 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massmann, W. H. 1963. Summer food of juvenile American shad in Virginia waters. Ches. Sci. 4: 167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLemore, C. E. & W. R. Meehan. 1988. Invertebrates of Meadow Creek, Union County, Oregon, and their use as food by trout. U. S. Dept. Agric. For. Serv., Res. Paper PNW-RP-394. 13 pp.

  • O'Hop, J. & J. B. Wallace. 1983. Invertebrate drift, discharge, and sediment relations in a southern Appalachian headwater stream. Hydrobiologia 98: 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. E. 1984. Depth distributions of armored catfish: Predator-induced resource avoidance? Ecology 65: 523–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prejs, A. 1987. Risk of predation and feeding rate in tropical fishes: field evidence. Oecologia 72: 259–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prejs, A. & K. Prejs. 1987. Feeding of tropical freshwater fishes: seasonality in resource availability and resource use. Oecologia 71: 397–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, I. J. 1987. The role of predation in age- and sizerelated habitat use by stream fishes. Ecology 68: 651–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, W. D. 1985. Size selection of food by cutthroat trout,Salmo clarki, in an Idaho stream. Great Basin Nat. 45: 327–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statzner, B. & B. Higler. 1986. Stream hydraulics as a major determinant of benthic invertebrate zonation patterns. Freshw. Biol. 16: 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surber, E. W. 1951. Bottom fauna and temperature conditions in relation to trout management in St. Mary's River, Augusta County, Virginia. Virginia J. Sci. 2: 190–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquatic Sci. 37: 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherley, N. S. 1987. The diet and growth of O-group dace,Leuciscus leuciscus (L.), and roachRutilus rutilus (L.), in a lowland river. J. Fish Biol. 30: 237–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E. & D. S. Hall, 1988. Ontogenetic habitat shifts in bluegill: the foraging rate-predation risk trade-off. Ecology 69: 1352–1366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garman, G.C. Use of terrestrial arthropod prey by a stream-dwelling cyprinid fish. Environ Biol Fish 30, 325–331 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028848

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028848

Key words

Navigation