Skip to main content
Log in

Ontogenetic variations in the type and size of prey consumed by juvenile coho,Oncorhynchus kisutch, and chinook,O. tshawytscha, salmon

  • Full Papers
  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

Stomach contents of juvenile coho,Oncorhynchus kisutch, and chinook,O. tshawytscha, salmon collected in purse seines off the coast of Washington and Oregon were examined for variations related to predator size. There was a general trend toward increasing consumption of fish with increasing body size, due mainly to the increase in northern anchovy biomass consumed by the larger salmon. Most of the major prey taxa showed significant differences among the size classes examined for both salmon species. There was a direct relationship between predator and prey size for both coho and chinook, but considerable variation was found in prey length consumed within each size class. Prey width did not provide as good a fit as prey length for either species. In general, coho consumed larger fish prey in relation to their body length than chinook but there were substantial differences by month or year of collection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Beacham, T.D. 1986. Type, quantity, and size of food of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus) in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, British Columbia. U.S. Fish. Bull. 84: 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breck, J.E. & M.J. Gitter. 1983. Effect of fish size on the reactive distance of bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) sunfish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40: 162–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur, R.D., D.M. Gadomski, W.G. Pearcy, H.P. Batchelder & C.B. Miller. 1985. Abundance and distribution of ichthyoplankton in the upwelling zone off Oregon during anomalous El Niño conditions. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci. 21: 365–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur, R.D., H.V. Lorz & W.G. Pearcy. 1987. Food habits and dietary variability of pelagic nekton off Oregon and Washington, 1979–1984. NOAA Tech. Rep. 57. 32 pp.

  • Brodeur, R.D. & W.G. Pearcy. 1986. Distribution and relative abundance of pelagic nonsalmonid nekton off Oregon and Washington, 1979–1984. NOAA Tech. Rep. 46. 85 pp.

  • Brodeur, R.D. & W.G. Pearcy. 1990. Trophic relations of juvenile Pacific salmon off the Oregon and Washington coast. U.S. Fish Bull. (Submitted)

  • Dunbrack, R.L. & L.M. Dill. 1983. A model of size dependent surface feeding in a stream dwelling salmonid. Env. Biol. Fish. 8: 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, D.M. 1982. Planktivore preference by prey size. Ecology 63: 381–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, K.K. 1983. Predator-prey relationships for juvenile chinook salmon,Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, feeding on zooplankton in ‘in situ’ enclosures. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40: 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J.P. & W.G. Pearcy. 1988. Growth of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in the ocean off Oregon and Washington, USA, in years of differing coastal upwelling. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45: 1036–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.D. 1980. Ecological aspects of ontogenetic shifts in prey size utilization in the bay goby (Pisces: Gobiidae). Oecologia 47: 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.D., R. Coffin & P.B. Moyle. 1980. Feeding ecology of the bay goby (Pisces: Gobiidae). Effects of behavioral, ontogenetic, and temporal variation on diet. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 44: 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, N.B. & R.J. LeBrasseur. 1985. Species selective predation on juvenile pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and chum salmon (O. keta) by coho salmon (O. kisutch). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42: 659–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hespenheide, H.A. 1975. Prey characteristics and predator niche width. pp. 158–180.In: M.L. Cody & J.M. Diamond (ed.) Ecology and Evolution of Communities, Belknap Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, A. 1985a. The piscivore feeding guild of fishes in small freshwater ecosystems. Env. Biol. Fish. 12: 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, A. 1985b. Development of dietary specializations in a summer community of juvenile fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 13: 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J.S., I.K. Birtwell & G.M. Kruzynski. 1987. Food and habitat utilization by juvenile salmonids in the Campbell River estuary. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44: 1233–1246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, S.B. & R. Buckley. 1976. Marine mortality of Puget Sound coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33: 1677–1684.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, G.T., Jr., W.D. Muir, R.L. Emmett & J.T. Durkin. 1983. Interrelationships between juvenile salmonids and nonsalmonid fish in the Columbia River estuary. U.S. Fish Bull. 81: 815–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada, S. & A. Taniguchi. 1971. Size relationship between salmon juveniles in shore waters and their prey animals. Bull. Fac. Fish., Hokkaido Univ. 22: 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy, W.G. & J.P. Fisher. 1988. Migrations of coho salmon,Oncorhynchus kisutch, during their first summer in the ocean. U.S. Fish. Bull. 86: 173–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearre, S., Jr. 1980. The copepod width-weight relation and its utility in food chain research. Can. J. Zool. 58: 1884–1891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearre, S., Jr. 1986. Ratio-based trophic niche breadths of fish, the Sheldon spectrum, and the size-efficiency hypothesis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 27: 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, W.T., R.D. Brodeur, & W.G. Pearcy. 1982. Food habits of juvenile salmon in the Oregon coastal zone, June 1979. U.S. Fish. Bull. 80: 841–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.T. 1978. Trophic ontogeny of the leopard searobin,Prionotus scitulus (Pisces: Triglidae). U.S. Fish. Bull. 76: 225–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggerone, G.T. 1989. Coho salmon predation on juvenile sockeye salmon in the Chignik Lakes, Alaska. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle. 151 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, R.J. & S.J. Holbrook. 1984a. Gape-limitation, foraging tactics and prey size selectivity of two microcarnivorous species of fish. Oecologia 63: 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, R.J. & S.J. Holbrook. 1984b. Ontogeny of prey selection by black surfperchEmbiotoca jacksoni (Pisces: Embiotocidae): the roles of fish morphology, foraging behavior, and patch selection. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 18: 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, A.W. 1980. Feeding ecology ofLagodon rhomboides (Pisces: Sparidae): Variation and functional responses. U.S. Fish. Bull. 78: 337–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wańkowski, J.W.J. 1979. Morphological limitations, prey size selectivity, and growth response of juvenile Atlantic salmon,Salmo salar. J. Fish Biol. 14: 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wańkowski, J.W.J. & J.E. Thorpe. 1979. The role of food particle size in the growth of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). J. Fish Biol. 14: 351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. 1974. The fish size, prey size, handling time relation in several sunfishes and some implications. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 31: 1531–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. & J.F. Gilliam. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 393–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. & D.J. Hall. 1977. Competition and habitat shift in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology 58: 869–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda, F. 1960. The feeding mechanisms of some carnivorous fishes. Rec. Oceanogr. Works Japan 5: 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brodeur, R.D. Ontogenetic variations in the type and size of prey consumed by juvenile coho,Oncorhynchus kisutch, and chinook,O. tshawytscha, salmon. Environ Biol Fish 30, 303–315 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028846

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028846

Key words

Navigation