Skip to main content
Log in

Agroforestry on alkali soils: Effect on some management practices on initial growth, biomass accumulation and chemical composition of selected tree species

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This field study started in July 1982 on a typical alkali soil (Aquic Natrustalf, ESP 99.7) examined the growth responses to some management practices in a unified system planned to establish agroforestry. The planting of 3 salt tolerant tree species with two methods: on flat natural surface (FSPB) without rainwater conservation and on ridges (0.6 m high, 1.5 m at top and 2.5 m at base) having parallel trenches of the same section to store 300 mm of monsoon rainwater; constituted the main plot treatments. The tree planting with and without forage grassDiplachne fusca linn. in the inter-row space and planting in shallow (15 × 60 cm) and deep (15 × 180 cm to cross hard pan) augerholes filled with amendment treated soil (2 kg gypsum, 8 kg FYM, 50 g N, 10 g zinc sulphate and original soil) formed the sub and sub-plot treatments replicated 4 times in a split-split plot design.

The mean plant height ofEucalyptus tereticornis smith;Acacia nilotica L; andParkinsonia aculeata L. in 2 years period was 273 and 328, 240 and 240 and 211 and 199 cm respectively with and without rainwater conservation. The corresponding height of the 3 tree species was 314 and 287, 250 and 231 and 207 and 203 cm with and without grass in the inter-row space. Similarly the plant height was 247 and 354, 182 and 298, 172 and 238 in shallow and deep augerholes respectively. The tree height and basal diameter differences with and without rainwater conservation and grass growth remained non-significant but deep augerhole planting was markedly superior to the shallow augerhole planting. The 2 year biomass accumulation also followed the same trend. The grass competed with trees for moisture during hot dry summer months and increased plant mortality particularly in the shallow augerholes and more so on ridges. The plant roots, essentially, remained confined to the amended soil of the augerholes in FSPB but proliferated in the loose soil of ridges or grass and submergence ameliorated surface soil of trenches.Acacia nilotica accumulated low sodium and had the lowest Na:Ca and Na:K ratio. It was found more promising than eucalyptus and parkinsonia as it experienced low mortality and had better chemical constitution to tolerate adverse alkali soil environment. The rainwater conservation system needed further evaluation before drawing final conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrol IP and Bhumbla DR (1971) Saline and alkali soils in India, their occurrence and management. World Soil Resources FAO Report No. 41: 42–51

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abrol IP and Bhumbla DR (1979) Crop responses to differential gypsum application in a highly sodic soil and the tolerance of several crops to exchangeable sodium under field conditions. Soil Sci 127:79–85

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abrol IP and Sandhu SS (1980) Growing trees in alkali soils. Indian Farming 30(6):19–20

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abrol IP and Sandhu SS (1981) Eucalyptus and Acacia can be grown in alkali soils. Indian Farming 31(1): 7–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Acharya CL and Abrol IP (1978) Exchangeable sodium and soil water behaviour under field conditions. Soil Sci 125:310–319

    Google Scholar 

  6. Acharya CL, Sandhu SS and Abrol IP (1979) Effect of exchangeable sodium on the field drying pattern of soil at two evaporative demands. Soil Sci 127:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson CA (1982) The effect of high pH and P on the development of lime chlorosis in two seedling population ofEucalyptus obliqua L. hert. Plant and Soil 69:199–212

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anonymous (1976) Report of the National Commission of Agriculture, Part V, New Delhi

  9. Becock PC (1965) Iron nutrition of plants at high pH. Soil Sci 79:167–175

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bhargava GP, Sharma RC, Pal DK and Abrol IP (1980) A case study of the distribution and formation of salt affected soils in Haryana State. Int Symp Salt Affected Soils, Karnal, 83–91

  11. Bhargava OP (1951) On experiments to afforest alkali areas in Madhya Pradesh. Proc VIII Silvi Conf II, 103–106

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bhumbla DR (1977) Alkali and saline soils of India. Paper presented at Indo-Hungarian Seminar on Management of Salt Affected Soils, Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Feb 7–12, 1977 pp 14–19

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bohm W (1979) Methods of studying root systems. Ecological Studies 33. Springer-Verlag, New York 186 p

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chapman HD (1964) Suggested foliar sampling and handling techniques for determining the nutrient status of some field, horticultural and plantation crops. Ind J Hort 21:97–119

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chaturvedi MD (1955) No tree fit to compare with Babul. Indian Farming 5(8): 15–17

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cochran WG and GM (1950) Experimental Designs. 2nd Ed pp 304

  17. Colie TS (1952) Soil and the growth of trees. Adv Agron 4:329–394

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dhruva Narayana VV and Abrol IP (1981) Effects of reclamation of alkali soils on water balance. In. Tropical Agricultural Hydrology. Ed R Lal and Russels EW. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, pp 283–298

  19. Garg VK and Khanduja SD (1976) Nutritional status of some fruit trees grown on normal and alkali soils. Scientific Hort 5(3):243–247

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hayward HE and Wadleigh CH (1949) Plant growth on saline and alkali soils. Adv Agron 1:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Printice Hall, India, pp 151–153

    Google Scholar 

  22. Joshi YC, Qadar Ali Bal AR and Dwivedi RS (1980) Selective absorption and exclusion processes of toxic ions. Annual Report CSSRI, Karnal, 1980. pp 78

  23. Kaul RN and Mann HS (1977) Tree planting and energy crisis: firewood. Indian Farming 26(2):79–81

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khan WAW and Yadav JSP (1962) Characteristics and afforestation problems of saline alkali soils. Indian Forester 83(4):259–271

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar A and Abrol IP (1984) Studies on the reclaiming effect of Karnal grass and para-grass grown in a highly sodic soil. Indian J Agric Sci 54(3):189–193

    Google Scholar 

  26. Massoumi A and Cornfield AH (1963) A rapid method for determining sulphate in water extracts of soils. Analyst 88:321–322

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pearson GA and Bernstein L (1958) Influence of exchangeable sodium on yield, chemical composition of plant. II. Wheat, oats, barley, rice, tall fescue and tall wheat grass. Soil Sci 86:254–261

    Google Scholar 

  28. Raupach M (1967) Soil and fertiliser requirements for forest of Pinus radiata. Adv Agron 19:307–353

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yadav JSP (1977) Tree growth on salt affected lands. Indian Farming 26(11):43–45.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yadav JSP (1980) Salt affected soils and their afforestation. Indian Forester 106(4):259–272

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grewal, S.S., Abrol, I.P. Agroforestry on alkali soils: Effect on some management practices on initial growth, biomass accumulation and chemical composition of selected tree species. Agroforest Syst 4, 221–232 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028356

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028356

Key words

Navigation