Skip to main content
Log in

Prior residency as a key determinant of social dominance in the willow tit (Parus montanus)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We studied how age, body size and prior residency affected social dominance in the willow tit (Parus montanus) groups. The contribution of each variable was experimentally tested in unisexual two-bird trials, in which the birds were matched for all variables except the one studied. Large birds were dominant over smaller ones (Fig. 1). The effect of body size was more prominent in males than in females. Age had no influence on dominance. Residents became dominant more often than newcomers (Fig. 2). Adulthood or larger body size did not override the advantage of prior residency (Fig. 2). Therefore, the proximate reason for the age-dependent dominance seen in natural willow tit flocks is most likely the prior residency advantage of the adults. Factors connected with fighting ability (body size and age) seem to be less important than the time of establishment of rank, which may reflect the importance of resource value differences between residents and newcomers in this context. The advantage of residency might make it advantageous to be a member of a flock even as a subordinate, rather than being solitary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arcese P, Smith JNM (1985) Phenotypic correlates and ecological consequences of dominance in song sparrows. J Anim Ecol 54:817–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristol DA, Nolan V Jr, Ketterson ED (1990) Effect of prior residence on dominance status of dark-eyed juncos,Junco hyemalis. Anim Behav 40:580–586

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laet JF (1985) Dominance and antipredator behaviour of great titsParus major: a field study. Ibis 127:372–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers A, Hannon SJ, Nordin KE (1988) Winter survival and territory acquisition in a northern population of black-capped chickadees. Auk 105:727–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J (1979a) Coherence, composition and territories of winter social groups of the willow titParus montanus and the crested titP. cristatus. Ornis Scand 10:56–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J (1979b) Non-territorial willow titsParus montanus de Selys-Longchamp in late summer and early autumn. Ornis Scand 10:262–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J (1987) Exposure and time use in willow tit flocks: the cost of subordination. Anim Behav 35:445–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J (1989) Ecology of non-breeding social systems ofParus. Wilson Bull 101: 263–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J, Askenmo C (1984) Social rank and habitat use in willow tit groups. Anim Behav 32:508–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J, Cederholm G, Askenmo C (1981) Spacing and survival in winter groups of willow titParus montanus and crested titP. cristatus, a removal study. J Anim Ecol 50:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett MC (1981) Body size, its heritability and influence on juvenile survival among great tits,Parus major. Ibis 123:31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegner RE (1985) Dominance and anti-predator behaviour in blue tits (Parus caeruleus). Anim Behav 33:762–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftorn S (1956) Contribution to the food biology of tits especially about storing of surplus food. Part III. The willow tit (Parus atricapillus L.). Kgl Norske Vidensk Selsk Skr 3:1–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1987) Social rank in winter flocks of willow tits,Parus montanus. Ibis 129: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1988a) Social rank and antipredator behaviour of willow titsParus montanus in winter flocks. Ibis 130:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1988b) Rank-related resource access in winter flocks of willow titParus montanus. Ornis Scand 19:169–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1989a) Social organization and dominance behaviour in someParus species. Wilson Bull 101:254–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1989b) The role of juvenile willow tits,Parus montanus, in the regulation of winter flock size: an experimental study. Anim Behav 38:920–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1990) Winter floaters in willow titsParus montanus — a matter of choice or making the best of bad situation? In: Blondel J, Gosler A, Lebreton JD, McCleery R (eds) Population biology of passerine birds — an integraded approach (NATO ASI Series, Series G vol. 24). Springer, Berlin, pp 415–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Holberton RL, Hanano R, Able KP (1990) Age-related dominance in male dark-eyed juncos: effects of plumage and prior residence. Anim Behav 40:573–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivula K, Orell M (1988) Social rank and winter survival in the willow titParus montanus. Ornis Fenn 65:114–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Laaksonen M, Lehikoinen E (1976) Age determination of willow and crested titParus montanus andP. cristatus. Ornis Fenn 53:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Parker GA (1976) The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim Behav 24:159–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson J-Å (1989) Establishment of juvenile marsh tits in winter flocks: an experimental study. Anim Behav 38:586–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson J-Å, Smith HG (1988) Effects of dispersal date on winter flock establishment and social dominance in marsh titsParus palustris. J Anim Ecol 57:917–928

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Rubenstein DI (1981) Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal conflicts. Anim Behav 29:221–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper WH, Wiley RH (1989) Correlates of dominance in wintering white-throated sparrows: age, sex and location. Anim Behav 37:298–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popp JW (1987) Resource value and dominance among American goldfinches. Bird Behav 7:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöysä H (1988) Feeding consequences of the dominance status in Great TitParus major groups. Ornis Fenn 65:69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Richner H (1989) Phenotypic correlates of dominance in carrion crows and their effects on access to food. Anim Behav 38:606–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandell M, Smith HG (1991) Dominance, prior occupancy, and winter residency in the great tit (Parus major). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KJ (1984) Dominance, predation, and optimal foraging in white-throated sparrow flocks. Ecology 65:1820–1827

    Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA (1979) Morphological correlates of dominance in captive male red-winged blackbirds. Condor 81:417–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM (1984) Flock switching in chickadees: why be a winter floater? Am Nat 123:81–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM (1987) Responses of floaters to removal experiments on wintering chickadees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:363–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson L (1984) Identification guide to European passerines. Privately published, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH (1990) Prior residence and coat-tail effects in dominance relationships of male dark-eyed juncos,Junco hyemalis. Anim Behav 40:587–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasukawa K, Bick EI (1983) Dominance hierarchies in dark-eyed juncos (Juncos hyemalis): a test of a game-theory model. Anim Behav 31:439–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokel DA (1989) Payoff asymmetries in contests among male brown-headed cowbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koivula, K., Lahti, K., Orell, M. et al. Prior residency as a key determinant of social dominance in the willow tit (Parus montanus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33, 283–287 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02027126

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02027126

Key words

Navigation