Skip to main content
Log in

National survey of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus in Belgian hospitals: Detection methods, prevalence trends and infection control measures

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A questionnaire survey of Belgian acute care hospitals was conducted to determine the methods used for detection of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA), to estimate the prevalence of this organism during the period 1989–1991 and to describe the infection control measures used locally for limiting its spread. Questionnaires were returned by 144 acute care hospitals, with a coverage of 41 to 72 % of hospitals by province. Methods used for detection of MRSA included disk diffusion (91 %), microdilution panels (8 %) and oxacillin agar screen (9 %). Only 34 % of laboratories performed disk diffusion testing under optimal conditions for detection of heterogeneous resistance. Among 36 hospitals reporting complete susceptibility data ofStaphylococcus aureus isolates tested during the study period (n=24,153), a mean MRSA prevalence of 14 % was found (range: 0–70 %). The median prevalence increased from 9.5 % in 1989 to 13.7 % in 1991 and showed a significant linear increase during this period in 30 % of these hospitals (p<0.01). Precautions used for controlling spread of MRSA included hand decontamination using either soap and water or antimicrobial preparations (68 % of hospitals), room decontamination (62 %), patient isolation (55 %) and various barrier precautions (24–49 %). Carrier screening was performed in 37 % of hospitals, but antibiotic decolonization was attempted in only 24 %. This survey identified areas for improvement in MRSA detection methods and underscored the need for multicentric surveillance of MRSA prevalence and a reappraisal of MRSA control strategies in Belgian hospitals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyce JM Patterns of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus prevalence. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1991, 12: 79–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyce JM Increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus in the United States. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1990, 11: 639–642.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Panlilio AL, Culver DH, Gaynes RP, Banerjee S, Henderson TS, Tolson JS Martone WJ Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus in U.S. hospitals, 1975–1991. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1992, 13: 582–586.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wakefield DS, Pfaller M, Massanari M, Hammons GT Variation in methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus occurrence by geographic location and hospital characteristics. Infection Control 1987, 8: 151–157.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stamm AM, Lona MN, Belcher B Higher overall nosocomial infection rate because of increased attack rate of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. American Journal of Infection Control 1993, 21: 70–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goetz AM, Muder RR The problem of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus: a critical appraisal of the efficacy of infection control procedures with a suggested approach for infection control programs. American Journal of Infection Control 1992, 20: 80–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wakefield DS, Helms CM, Massanari RM, Mori M, Pfaller M Cost of nosocomial infection: relative contributions of laboratory, antibiotic, and per diem costs in seriousStaphylococcus aureus infections. American Journal of Infection Control 1988, 16: 185–192.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyce JM Should we vigorously try to contain and control methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus? Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1991, 12: 46–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jorgensen JH Mechanisms of methicillin resistance inStaphylococcus aureus and methods for laboratory detection. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1991, 12: 14–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hackbarth CJ, Chambers HF Methicillin-resistant staphylococci detection methods and treatment of infections. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1989, 33: 995–999.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chambers HF Methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1988, 1: 173–186.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Skulnick M, Simor AE, Greason D, Patel M, Small GW, Kreiswirth B, Hathoway D, Low DE Evaluation of commercial and standard methodology for determination of oxacillin susceptibility inStaphylococcus aureus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 1985–1988.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyce JM Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus in hospitals and long-term care facilities: microbiology, epidemiology, and preventive measures. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1992, 13: 725–737.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Working Party Report Revised guidelines for the control of epidemic methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Journal of Hospital Infection 1990, 16: 351–377.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van der Auwera P, Godard C, Denis C, De Maeyer S, Vanhoof R In vitro activities of new antimicrobial agents against multiresistantStaphylococcus aureus isolated from septicemic patients during a Belgian national survey from 1983 to 1985. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1990, 34: 2260–2262.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dean AD, Dean JA, Burton AH, Dicker RC Epi Info, Version 5: a word processing, database, and statistics program for epidemiology on micro-computers. USD, Inc., Stone Mountain, GA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Document M100-S4 NCCLS, Villanova, PA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Acar J, Bergogne-Bérézin E, Chabbert Y, Cluzel R, Courtieu A, Courvalin P, Dabernat H, Drugeon H, Duval J, Flandrois JP, Fleurette J, Goldstein F, Meyran M, Morel CI, Philippon A, Sirot J, Soussy CJ, Thabaut A, Veron M Communiqué 1991 du Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie. Pathologie Biologie 1991, 39: 737–740.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Archer GL, Pennell E Detection of methicillin resistance in staphylococci by using a DNA probe. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1990, 34: 1720–1724.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Unal S, Hoskins J, Flokowitsch JE, Wu CYE, Preston DA, Skatrud PL Detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci by using the polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 1685–1691.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Murakami K, Minamide W, Wada K, Nakamura E, Teraoka H, Watanabe S Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 2240–2244.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tokue Y, Shoji S, Satoh K, Watanabe A, Motomiya M Comparison of a polymerase chain reaction assay and a conventional microbiologic method for detection of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1992, 36: 6–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lacey RW Multi-resistantStaphylococcus aureus — a suitable case for inactivity? Journal of Hospital Infection 1987, 9: 103–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Onesko KM, Wienke EC The analysis of the impact of a mild, low-iodine lotion soap on the reduction of nosocomial methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus: a new opportunity for surveillance by objectives. Infection Control 1987, 8: 284–288.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tuffnell DJ, Croton RS, Hemingway DM, Hartley MN, Wake PN, Garvey RJP Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus; the role of antisepsis in the control of an outbreak. Journal of Hospital Infection 1987, 10: 255–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Casewell MW, Hill RLR Minimal dose requirements for nasal mupirocin and its role in the control of epidemic MRSA. Journal of Hospital Infection 1991, 19: 35–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hill RLR Elimination of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus with mupirocin during a hospital outbreak. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1988, 22: 377–384.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Reagan DR Elimination of coincidentStaphylococcus aureus nasal and hand carriage with intranasal application of mupirocin calcium ointment. Annals of Internal Medicine 1991, 114: 101–106.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Struelens, M.J., Mertens, R. & the Groupement pour le Dépistage, l'Etude et la Prévention des Infections Hospitalières. National survey of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus in Belgian hospitals: Detection methods, prevalence trends and infection control measures. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13, 56–63 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02026128

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02026128

Keywords

Navigation