Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of studies published in the international literature by scientists at the National University of Mexico

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 2192 articles published in the international literature with UNAM (National University of Mexico) first author affiliation and registered by the CICH (Centro de Iformación Científica y Humanística) BIBLAT database from 1978-mid-1987 were included in our analysis. Distribution of articles according to the main subject areas of the 692 different journal titles used was as follows: Physics 24.1%, Medicine 19.7%, Biology 19.4%, Chemistry 9.7%, Engineering 8.9%, Exact Sciences 7.3%, Geosciences 4.7%, Psychology 0.96%, Agrosciences 0.27%. Thirty-seven percent of articles were published in journals with a known impact factor for 1987 of ≤1, 46.1% (920) in journals within the range of >1–3 average citations/article and only 16.4% (327) in those titles with a factor >3. Fifty-four percent (1082) of studies appeared in journals whose total citation count for 1987 was ≤5000; 7.3% (146) in journals cited >50,000 times in that same year. UNAM scientists therefore as a group tend to publish in journals whose articles are not frequently cited in subsequent publications thus limiting their impact and visibility in the international scientific literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Anderson, New approaches to evaluation in UK research funding agencies. SPSG Concept Paper No. 9,The Science Policy Support Group, London, October 1989.

  2. J. King, A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation,Journal of Information Science, 13 (1987) 261–276.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.D. Frame, Quantitative indicators for evaluation of basic research programs/projects,IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-30 (1983) 106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.F. Moed, W.J.M. Burger, J.G. Frankfort, A.F.J. Van Raan, The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance,Research Policy, 14 (1985) 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N.C. Mullins, Evaluating research programs: measurement and data sources,Science and Public Policy, 14 (1987) 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Narin, Bibliometric techniques in the evaluation of research programs,Science and Public Policy, 14 (1987) 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ABRC: Evaluation of national performance in basic research. ABRC Science Policy Studies No. 1.Advisory Board for the Research Councils, London, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Stolte-Heiskanen, Evaluation of scientific performance on the periphery,Science and Public Policy, 13 (1986) 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.M. Russell, M.S. Correa Noyola, N. García Aguilar, J.A. Guadarrama Hérnandez, L. Priego Orozco, Research and publication trends of a Latin American veterinary faculty,Interciencia, 12 (1987) 243–244.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.M. Russell, C.S. Galina, Research and publishing trends in cattle reproduction in the tropics: Part 2. A Third World prerogative,Animal Breeding Abstracts, 55 (1987) 819–828.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Arvanitis, Y. Chatelin, National scientific strategies in tropical soil sciences,Social Studies of Science, 18 (1988) 113–146.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ch.H. Davis, Th.O. Eisemon, Mainstream and non mainstream scientific literature in four peripheral Asian scientific communities,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Tomer, A statistical assessment of two measures of citation: the impact factor and the immediacy index,Information Processing and Management, 22 (1986) 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Schubert, W. Glänzel, T. Braun, Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 16, (1989) 3–478.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Velho, Publication and citation patterns of Brazilian agricultural scientists,Social Studies of Science, 14 (1984) 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. González Blasco, Los que publican y los que no publican en la investigación científica española,Interciencia 5 (1980) 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.D. Frame, Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean,Interciencia, 2 (1977) 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Arunachalam, U.N. Singh, Where do Israeli scientists publish?Journal of Information Science, 14 (1988) 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Vinkler, An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes,Scientometrics, 13 (1988) 239–259.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Garfield, How ISI selects journals for coverage: quantitative and qualitative considerations,Current Contents, 22 (May 28, 1990) 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delgado, H., Russell, J.M. Impact of studies published in the international literature by scientists at the National University of Mexico. Scientometrics 23, 75–90 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020915

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020915

Keywords

Navigation