Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of four miniaturized biochemical test systems (API 20C Auxanogram, Mycotube, Oricult, and Uni-Yeast-Tek) for the identification of yeasts was evaluated using standard biochemical tests as reference. One hundred and twenty-six strains were used for the study. Mycotube identified 93 % of the strains correctly, and Uni-Yeast-Tek 89 %. API 20C Auxanogram and Oricult identified 77 % and 82 % of the strains respectively if the germ tube test was also included. Mycotube and Uni-Yeast-Tek in particular facilitate identification of yeasts in the routine clinical laboratory but recourse to microscopic examination of morphology and other supplementary tests may also be necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lodder, J. (ed.): The yeasts. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Louvois, J., Mulhall, A., Hurley, R.: Biochemical identification of clinically important yeasts. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1979, 32: 715–718.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buesching, W. J., Kurek, K., Roberts, G. D.: Evaluation of the modified API 20C system for identification of clinically important yeasts. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1979, 9: 565–569.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dermoumi, H.: Die Bestimmung von hefeähnlichen Pilzen aus klinischem Untersuchungsmaterial mit dem API 20C Auxanogram. Das Ärztliche Laboratorium 1979, 25: 289–291.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shinoda, T., Kaufman, L., Padhye, A. A.: Comparative evaluation of the iatron serological Candida check-kit and the API 20C kit for identification of medically importantCandida species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1981, 13: 513–518.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Huppert, M., Haper, G., Sun, S. H., Delanerolle, V.: Rapid methods for identification of yeasts. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1975, 2: 21–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dickgiesser, N., Pieringer, E.: Suitability of the modified API 20C, Mycotube and Bacto-Candida albicans-antiserum for the identification of yeasts in the routine laboratory. Zentralblatt der Bakteriologie und Hygiene (A) 1980, 247: 132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dermoumi, H.: Mycotube — ein neues Hilfsmittel zur Bestimmung medizinisch bedeutsamer Hefen. Das Ärztliche Laboratorium 1978, 24: 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gille, Y., Guinet, R., Terraillon, J.: Evaluation d'une méthode simplifiée (Mycotube R) d'identification de levure. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses 1981, 11: 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miyamoto, C., Okuda, T., Ikeda, A., Marujama, H. B.: Functional evaluation of „Mycotube“ Roche, a new kit for taxonomical identification of pathogenic yeasts. Japanese Journal of Medical Mycology 1980, 21: 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bowman, P. I., Ahearn, D. G.: Evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek kit for the identification of medically important yeasts. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1975, 2: 354–358.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergan, T., Hollum, A.B. & Vangdal, M. Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts. Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 1, 217–222 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019711

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019711

Keywords

Navigation