Skip to main content
Log in

Carotid endarterectomy without arteriography: The preeminent role of the Vascular Laboratory

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

The classic workup of patients considered for carotid endarterectomy (CE) has included contrast arteriography to delineate the nature and extent of the arterial pathology. Noninvasive testing (NIT) consisting of duplex scanning plus sound spectrum analysis is an alternative method for accurately evaluating the carotid bifurcation. The accuracy of our laboratory in comparing NIT to contrast arteriography has been established by use of the guidelines suggested by the Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories. Forty-two patients underwent CE based on NIT alone. Seventeen had hemispheric transient ischemic attacks or minor strokes, six had amaurosis fugax, three had nonspecific symptoms, and 16 were asymptomatic. NIT identified a severe stenosis that was limited to the carotid bifurcation; the internal carotid artery distal to the bulb was normal. The predicted stenotic atherosclerotic lesion was confirmed at operation in all patients. One patient had a high bifurcation that required an extension of the original incision. Of three undiagnosed kinked distal internal carotid arteries found at operation, only one required surgical correction. No transient ischemic attacks, strokes, or deaths occurred postoperatively. CE can be performed in selected patients based on NIT alone, obviating the mortality, morbidity, and cost of arteriography. This algorithm demands that the NIT is unequivocal and the accuracy of the testing laboratory is established and maintained according to published standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–453.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial. Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–90%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1235–1257.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dawson DL, Zierler RE, Kohler TR. Role of arteriography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid artery disease. Am J Surg 1991;161:619–624.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Geuder JW, Lamparello PJ, Riles PS, et al. Is duplex scanning sufficient evaluation before cartoid endarterectomy? J Vasc Surg 1989;9:193–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ricotta JR, Holen J, Schenk E, et al. Is routine angiography necessary prior to carotid endarterectomy? J Vasc Surg 1984; 1:96–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Walsh J, Markowitz I, Kerstein MD. Carotid endarterectomy for amaurosis fugax without angiography. Am J Surg 1986; 152:172–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas GI, Jones TW, Stavney LS, et al. Carotid endarterectomy after Doppler ultrasonic examination without angiography. Am J Surg 1986;151:616–619.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crew JR, Dean M, Johnson JM, et al. Carotid surgery without angiography. Am J Surg 1984;148:217–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodson SF, Flanigan DP, Bishara RA, et al. Can carotid duplex scanning supplant arteriography in patients with focal carotid territory symptoms? J Vasc Surg 1987;5:551–557, 1987.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore WS, Ziomek S, Quinones-Baldrich WJ, et al. Can clinical evaluation and noninvasive testing substitute for arteriography in the evaluation of carotid artery disease? Ann Surg 1988;208:91–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baker WH. Cartoid endarterectomy. In Baker WH, ed. Diagnosis and treatment of carotid artery disease. New York: Futura, 1985, pp 181–212.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Akers DL, Bell WH, Kerstein MD. Does intracranial dye study contribute to evaluation of carotid artery disease? Am J Surg 1988;156:87–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roederer GO, Langlois YE, Chan ARW, et al. Is siphon disease important in predicting the outcome of carotid endarterectomy? Arch Surg 1983;118:1177–1181.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuler JJ, Flanigan DP, Lim LT, et al. The effect of carotid siphon stenosis on stroke rate, death, and relief of symptoms following elective carotid endarterectomy. Surgery 1982; 92: 1058–1067.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Akers DL, Markowitz IA, Kerstein MD. The value of arotic arch study in the evaluation of cerebrovascular insufficiency. Am J Surg 1987;154:230–232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ, et al. Clinical events following neuroangiography: A prospective study. Stroke 1987;18:997–1004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Earnest F, Forbes G, Sandok BA, et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: Prospective assessment of risk. AJR 1984;247–253.

  18. Gomes AS, Lois JF, Baker JD, et al. Acute renal dysfunction in high-risk patients after angiography: Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media. Radiology 1989;170:65–68. 1989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hessel SJ, Adams DF, Abrams HL. Complications of angiography. Radiology 1981;273–281.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Horn, M., Michelini, M., Greisler, H.P. et al. Carotid endarterectomy without arteriography: The preeminent role of the Vascular Laboratory. Annals of Vascular Surgery 8, 221–224 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018167

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018167

Keywords

Navigation