Abstract
Methodological implications of four accounting procedures applied in multiple authorship treatment relating to author productivity distribution were investigated. The emphasis was given to the individual author rank and inequality pattern of data. It was found that similar pattern of inequality holds in three of the four analysed cases, in spite of the fact that significant changes were observed on the individual level. By introducing the concept of dual approach a plausible interpretation of that phenomenon was obtained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A.I. Yablonsky, On fundamental regularities of the distribution of scientific productivity,Scientometrics 2 (1980) 3.
J. Vlachý, Evaluating the distribution of individual performance,Scientia Yugoslavica, 6 (1980) 155.
J. Vlachý, On publication characteristics of research establishments,Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, B20 (1970) 1149.
D. De Solla Price, A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27 (1976) 292.
D Lindsey, Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: The problem of multiple authorship,Social Studies of Science, 10 (1980) 145.
J.S. Long, R. McGinnis, On adjusting productivity measures for multiple authorship,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 379.
D. Lindsey, Further evidence for adjusting for multiple authorship,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 389.
J.S. Long, R. McGinnis, Further evidence for adjusting for multiple authorship,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 397.
N. Pravdić, V. Oluić-Vuković, Dual approach to multiple authorship in the study of collaboration/scientific output relationship,Scientometrics, 10 (1986) 259.
S.S. Kyvik, Productivity differences, fields of learning, and Lotka's law,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 205.
L. Egghe, Consequences of Lotka's law for the law of Bradford,Journal of Documentation, 41 (1985) 173.
P.T. Nicholls, Price's square root law: Empirical validity and relation of Lotka's law,Information Processing and Management, 24 (1988) 469.
H. Eto, P.M. Candelaria, Applicability of the Bradford distribution to international science and technology indicators,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 27.
M.L. Pao, An empirical examination of Lotka's law,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37 (1985) 26.
V. Oluić-Vuković, Impact of productivity increase on the distribution pattern of journals,Scientometrics, 17 (1989) 97.
M.J. Moravcsik, Life in a multidimensional world,Scientometrics, 6 (1984) 75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dedicated to the memory of Michael J. Moravcsik
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pravdic, N., Oluic-Vukovic, V. Distribution of scientific productivity: Ambiguities in the assignment of author rank. Scientometrics 20, 131–144 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018151
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018151