Abstract
The assumption underlying citation analysis is that the citing authors select their references in a rational manner. The present study, based on a very homogeneous collection of clinical trials from a meta-analysis, provides a partial verification of this idea: citing authors prefer large studies to smaller ones, they also seem to prefer studies representing the minority view of the research issue, perhaps in order to make their presentation more balanced. On the other hand, in this instance the inclusion of a placebo in the study design does not affect citation frequency. Furthermore, the conjecture that heuristic value is a main determinant of citability is not settled.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B. C. Peritz, The use of meta-analysis for citation studies: an illustrative example,Informetrics-91,I. K. Ravichandra Rao, (Ed.) 1992, p. 358.
R. Collins, A. Scrimgeour, S. Yusuf, R. Peto, Reduction in fatal pulmonary embolism and venous thrombosis by perioperative administration of subcutaneous heparin,The New England Journal of Medicine, (1988, May 5) 1162.
P. Van Elteren, On the combination of independent two sample tests of Wilcoxon,Bulletin de l'Institut International de Statistique, 37 (1960) 351.
B. C. Peritz, A citation analysis of clinical trials; are definitive studies less cited than others?Informetrics 89/90,L. Egghe, R. Rousseau, (Eds), 1990, p. 243.
L. V. Hedges, I. Olkin,Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis, Orlando, Academic Press, 1985.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peritz, B.C. On the heuristic value of scientific publications and their design; A citation analysis of some clinical trials. Scientometrics 30, 175–186 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017221
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017221