Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between phototrophy and phagotrophy in the mixotrophic chrysophytePoterioochromonas malhamensis

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The time scales involved in the transition between phototrophic and phagotrophic modes of nutrition were examined in the mixotrophic chrysophytePoterioochromonas malhamensis. Phagotrophy began almost immediately when bacteria were added to phototrophically growing cultures of the alga, and chlorophylla concentration per cell in these cultures decreased over a 24-hour period. Chlorophyll concentrations per cell began to increase when bacteria were grazed to a density of approximately 106 ml−1, but after more than 24 hours they had not returned to the higher chlorophyll concentrations observed in the phototrophically grown cultures. Bacterivory was the dominant mode of nutrition in all cultures containing heat-killed bacteria. Photosynthesis did not contribute more than ≈7% of the total carbon budget of the alga when in the presence of abundant heat-killed bacteria. Bacterial density was the primary factor influencing the ability ofP. malhamensis to feed phagotrophically, while light intensity, pH, and the presence of dissolved organic matter had no effect on phagotrophy. We conclude thatP. malhamensis is capable of phagotrophy at all times. In contrast, phototrophy is inducible in the light during starvation and is a long-term survival strategy for this mixotrophic alga (i.e., it operates on time scales greater than a diel cycle).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aaronson S, Baker H (1959) A comparative biochemical study of two species ofOchromonas. J Protozool 6:282–284

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson A, Falk S, Samuelsson G, Hagström Å (1989) Nutritional characteristics of a mixotrophic nanoflagellate,Ochromonas sp. Microb Ecol 17:252–262

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bird DF, Kalff J (1986) Bacterial grazing by planktonic algae. Science 231:493–495

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bird DF, Kalff J (1987) Algal phagotrophy: Regulating factors and importance relative to photosynthesis inDinobryon (Chrysophyceae). Limnol Oceanogr 32:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bird DF, Kalff J (1989) Phagotrophic sustenance of a metalimnetic phytoplankton peak. Limnol Oceanogr 34:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caron DA, Porter KG, Sanders RW (1990) Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus budgets for the mixotrophic phytoflagellatePoterioochromas malhamensis (Chrysophyceae) during bacterial ingestion. Limnol Oceanogr (in press)

  7. Davis PG, Sieburth JMcN (1982) Differentiation of the phototrophic and heterotrophic nanoplankton populations in marine waters by epifluorescence microscopy. Ann Inst Oceanogr Paris 58[suppl]:249–261

    Google Scholar 

  8. Estep KW, Davis PG, Hargraves PE, Sieburth JM (1984) Chloroplast containing microflagellates in natural populations of North Atlantic nanoplankton, their identification and distribution; including a description of five new species ofChrysochromulina (Prymnesiophyceae). Protistologica 20:613–634

    Google Scholar 

  9. Estep KW, Davis PG, Keller M, Sieburth JM (1986) How important are oceanic algal nan-oflagellates in bacterivory? Limnol Oceanogr 31:646–650

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hutner SH, Provasoli L, Filfus J (1953) Nutrition of some phagotrophic fresh-water chrysomonads. Ann NY Acad Sci 56:852–862

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Myers J, Graham J (1956) The role of photosynthesis in the physiology ofOchromonas. J Cell Comp Physiol 47:397–414

    Google Scholar 

  12. Parsons TR, Maita Y, Lalli CM (1984) A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Porter KG (1988) Phagotrophic phytoflagellates in microbial food webs. Hydrobiologia 159:89–97

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porter KG, Feig YS (1980) The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora. Limnol Oceanogr 25:943–948

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sanders RW, Porter KG (1988) Phagotrophic phytoflagellates. In: Marshall K (ed) Advances in microbial ecology, vol. 10. Plenum Press, New York, pp 167–192

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sanders RW, Porter KG, Bennett SJ, DeBiase AE (1989) Seasonal patterns of bacterivory by flagellates, ciliates, rotifers, and cladocerans in a freshwater planktonic community. Limnol Oceanogr 34:673–687

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sherr BF, Sherr EB, Fallon RD (1987) Use of mono-dispersed, fluorescently labeled bacteria to estimate in situ protozoan bacterivory. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:958–965

    Google Scholar 

  18. Starr RC (1978) The culture colleciton of algae at the University of Texas at Austin. J Phycol 14[suppl]:47–100

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stein JR (1973) Handbook of phycological methods. Cambridge Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tranvik L, Porter KG, Sieburth JM (1989) Occurrence of bacterivory inCryptomonas, a common freshwater phytoplankter. Oecologia 78:473–476

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wetzel R, Likens GE (1979) Limnological analyses. WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanders, R.W., Porter, K.G. & Caron, D.A. Relationship between phototrophy and phagotrophy in the mixotrophic chrysophytePoterioochromonas malhamensis . Microb Ecol 19, 97–109 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02015056

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02015056

Keywords

Navigation