Skip to main content
Log in

Antirheumatic drug profiles evaluated in the adjuvant arthritis of rats by multiparameter analysis

  • Inflammation
  • Published:
Agents and Actions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Freund's adjuvant arthritis (FAA) in susceptible rats (male, Lewis strain) is a well-established experimental model of rheumatoid arthritis to evaluate inherent drug properties, i.e. anti-inflammatory and/or immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory properties which are only ascertained by combining multiple parameter analysis. We employed a synoptic multiparametric evaluation system for the multifaceted FAA, a so-called “spider scheme”, to facilitate a more rapid and easier comparison of qualitative and quantitative drug properties by visual display than that achieved by mere tabulation of the data. The spider scheme comprised six well-established parameters to evaluate the FAA disease (primary and secondary hind paw swelling, arthritic index which included macroscopic alterations of non-injected paws, nose, ears and tail, body weight changes and relative organ weights of thymus and spleen). By calculation of an index as a percent change in comparison to control and untreated diseased animals, the degree of improvement or impairment of the FAA by a tested compound could easily be entered into the spider scheme.

The FAA parameter spider scheme clearly differentiated the most beneficial immunomodulatory properties of cyclo-sporin A from those of the immunosuppressive agents dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide as well as from the mere anti-inflammatory cyclooxygenase inhibitors. Among this latter class of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory compounds, a similar profile was demonstrated for indometacin and diclofenac, as well as for tenidap, which is claimed to have cytokine-modulating properties, as reflected by the reduction of acute-phase proteins in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Yet, in this FAA model, with tenidap, no additional qualitative drug properties could be discerned. Quantitative improvement of certain parameters by indometacin was easily differentiated from unchanged disease parameters.

Thus, the complex set of pharmacological data provided by the rat FAA model was visually displayed by the multiparameter spider scheme, allowing a more rapid and easier comprehension of antirheumatic drug profiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Holoshitz, A. Matitiau and I. R. Cohen,Arthritis induced in rats by cloned T lymphocytes responsive to mycobacteria but not to collagen type II. J. Clin. Invest.73, 211–215 (1984).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. M. E. J. Billingham,Models of arthritis and the search for anti-arthritic drugs. Pharmacol. Ther.21, 389–428 (1983).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Theisen-Popp, H. Pape and R. Müller-Peddinghaus,Interleukin-6 (IL-6) in adjuvant arthritis of rats and its pharmacological modulation. Int. J. Immunopharmacol.14, 565–571 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. M. J. Dimartino, J. C. Lee, A. M. Badger, K. A. Muirhead, C. K. Mirabelli and N. Hanna, Antiarthritic and immunoregulatory activity of spirogermanium. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.236, 103–110 (1986).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. K. R. Gans, W. Galbraith, R. J. Roman, S. B. Haber, J. S. Kerr, W. K. Schmidt, C. Smith, W. E. Hewes and N. R. Ackerman, Anti-inflammatory and safety profile of DuP 697, a novel orally effective prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.254, 180–187 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. I. G. Otterness, T. J. Carty and L. D. Loose,Tenidap: A new drug for arthritis. InTherapeutic Approaches to Inflammatory diseases. (Eds. A. J. Lewis, N. S. Doherty and N. R. Ackerman) pp. 229–241, Elsevier, Amsterdam 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. G. Otterness, P. P. Pazoles, P. F. Moore and M. B. Pepys,C-reactive protein as an index of disease activity. Comparison of tenidap, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in rat adjuvant arthritis. J. Rheumatol.18, 505–511 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. L. D. Loose, B. H. Littman and J. D. Sipe,Modulation of acute phase proteins by tenidap, a new anti-inflammatory, antirheumatic drug. Clin. Res.38, 579A (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Katz, A. P. Borger and L. D. Loose,Evaluation of CP-66, 248 [5-chloro-2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-3-(2-thienyl-carbonyl)-indole-1-carboxamide] in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Arthritis Rheum.31 (4, Suppl.), A87 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. D. Sipe, L. M. Bartle and L. D. Loose,Modification of proinflammatory cytokine production by the antirheumatic agents tenidap and naproxen. A possible correlate with clinical acute phase response. J. Immunol.148, 480–484 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. K. M. Connolly, V. J. Stecher, T. Labrie and C. Fluno,Modulation of the acute phase response and in vitro measurement of interleukin-1 activity following administration of dexamethasone to adjuvant-arthritic rats. Immunopharmacology15, 133–142 (1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Fesus,Biochemical events in naturally occurring forms of cell death. FEBS Lett.328, 1–5 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. I. Otterness and D. Gans,Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: An analysis of the relationship between laboratory animal and clinical doses, including species scaling. Pharmacol. Sci.77, 790–795 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Hirano, S. Akira, T. Taga and T. Kishimoto,Biological and clinical aspects of interleukin 6: Immunol. Today11, 443–449 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. D. E. Hatzigeorgiou, S. He, J. Sobel, K. H. Grabstein, A. Hafner and J. L. Ho,IL-6 down-modulates the cytokine-enhanced antileishmanial activity in human macrophages. J. Immunol.151, 3682–3692 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. A. C. Allison and S. W. Lee,The mode of action of anti-rheumatic drugs. 1. Anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids. Progr. Drug. Res.33, 63–81 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. M. Breuninger, W. L. Dempsey, J. Uhl and D. M. Murasko,Hydrocortisone regulation of interleukin-6 protein production by a purified population of human peripheral blood monocytes. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol.69, 205–214 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. A. W. Thomson, P. H. Whiting and J. G. Simpson,Cyclosporine: Immunology, toxicity and pharmacology in experimental animals. Agents and Actions15, 306–327 (1984).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. J. F. Borel, H. U. Gubler, P. C. Hiestand and R. M. Wenger,Immunopharmacological properties of cyclosporine (Sandimmune®) and (Val 2)-dihydrocyclosporine and their prospect in chronic inflammation. InTherapeutic control of inflammatory diseases new approaches to antirheumatic drugs. (Eds. I. Otterness, A. Lewis and R. Capetola) Raven Press, New York; Adv. Inflamm. Res.11, 277–291 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. M. Connolly, V. J. Stecher, E. Danis, D. J. Pruden and T. Labrie,Alteration of interleukin-1 production and the acute phase response following medication of adjuvant arthritic rats with cyclosporin-A or methotrexate. Int. J. Immunopharmacol.10, 717–728 (1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. E. del Pozo, M. Graeber, P. Elford and T. Payne,Regression of bone and cartilage loss in adjuvant arthritic rats after treatment with cyclosporin A. Arth. Rheum.33, 247–252 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Faulds, K. L. Goa and P. Benfield,Cyclosporin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in immunoregulatory disorders. Drugs45, 953–1040 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Theisen-Popp, P., Müller-Peddinghaus, R. Antirheumatic drug profiles evaluated in the adjuvant arthritis of rats by multiparameter analysis. Agents and Actions 42, 50–55 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014300

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014300

Key words

Navigation