Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of the community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. I.Stenocereus gummosus

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Yeast communities of decayingStenocereus gummosus were analyzed for spatial, temporal, and physiological characteristics. Analysis of random samples within plants, between plants, and between localities shows that the species proportions of the yeast community are relatively constant within plants and between localities, but that there is significant variability between rotting plants. It is suggested that the increased variability between plants represents sampling of different stages of succession. The physiological abilities of the yeast community also show a relatively constant pattern within plants and between localities yet more variability between plants.

The variablity profiles of species proportions and community physiological characters are demonstrated to be correlated within and between plants. This observation is an extension of the Kluge-Kerfoot phenomenon to the level of the community. The correlation of within and between plant variability profiles is suggested to be a result of the temporal and spatial availability of resources during the stages of rotting plant succession. The community structure is thus postulated to result from a set of possible future resource states of the habitat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fellows DP, Heed WB (1972) Factors affecting host plant selection in desert-adapted cactiphilic,Drosophia. Ecology 53:850–858

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fogleman JC, Starmer WT, Heed WB (1981) Larval selectivity for yeast species byDrosophila mojavensis in larval substrates. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 78(F):4435–4439

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbert DG (1980) Dispersal of yeasts and bacteria byDrosophila in a temperate forest. Oecologia (Berlin) 46:135–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heed WB (1978) Ecology and genetics of Sonoran DesertDrosophila. In: Brussard PF (ed). Ecological genetics: The interface. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 109–126

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heed WB, Starmer WT, Miranda M, Miller MW, Phaff HJ (1976) An analysis of the yeast flora associated with cactiphilicDrosophila and their host plants in the Sonoran Desert and its relation to temperate and tropical associations. Ecology 57(1):151–160

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kluge AG, Kerfoot WC (1973) The predictability and regularity of character divergence. Am. Natur 107:426–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitton JB (1978) Relationship between heterozygosity for enzyme loci and variation of morphological characters in natural populations. Nature 273(5564):661–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patil GP, Stiteler WM (1974) Concepts of aggregation and their quantification: A crictical review with some new results and applications. Res Pop Ecol 15(2):238–254

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pierce BA, Mitton JB (1979) A relationship of genetic variation within and among populations: An extension of the Kluge-Kerfoot phenomenon. Syst Zool 28(1):63–70

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schink B, Zeikus JG (1980) Microbial methanol formation: A major end product of pectin metabolism. Curr Microbiol 4:387–389

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sokal RR (1978) Population differentiation: Something new or more of the same. In: Brussard PF (ed) Ecological genetics: The interface. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 215–239

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sokal RR, Braumann CA (1980) Significance tests for coefficients of variation and variability profiles. Syst Zool 29:50–60

    Google Scholar 

  14. Starmer WT (1981) A comparison ofDrosophila habitats according to the physiological attributes of the associated yeast communities. Evolution 35(1):38–52

    Google Scholar 

  15. Starmer WT (1981) The evolutionary ecology of yeasts found in the decaying stems of cacti. In: Vth International Symposium on Yeasts, Pergamon of Canada Ltd, pp 494–498

  16. Starmer WT, Heed WB, Miranda M, Miller MW, Phaff HJ (1976) The ecology of yeast flora associated with cactophilicDrosophila and their host plants in the Sonoran Desert. Microb Ecol 3:11–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Starmer WT, Kircher HW, Phaff HJ (1980) Evolution and speciation of host plant specific yeasts. Evolution 34(1):137–146

    Google Scholar 

  18. Starmer WT, Phaff HJ, Miranda M, Miller MW, Heed WB (1982) The yeast flora associated with the decaying stems of columnar cacti andDrosophila in North America. Evol Biol 14:269–295

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vacek DC, Starmer WT, Heed WB (1979) Relevance of the ecology ofCitrus yeasts to the diet ofDrosophila. Microb Ecol 5:43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Van der Walt JP (1970) Criteria and methods used in classification. In: Lodder J (ed) The yeasts, a taxonomic study. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 34–113

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biology Department, Syracuse University, 13210, Syracuse, New York, USA

    William T. Starmer

Authors
  1. William T. Starmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Starmer, W.T. Analysis of the community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. I.Stenocereus gummosus . Microb Ecol 8, 71–81 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02011463

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02011463

Keywords

Search

Navigation