Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring microzooplankton grazing on planktonic marine bacteria by its impact on bacterial production

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grazing on planktonic bacteria by microzooplankton was estimated by separating bacteria from the larger plankton with 1μm pore Nuclepore filtration and measuring changes in bacteria in filtered and unfiltered samples over 24 hours. In the absence of grazers, bacteria increased linearly. The regression coefficient of linear increase was used to estimatein situ bacterial production. When grazers were present, the changes in bacteria concentration usually took the form of a linear decline, and grazing was estimated by subtracting the regression coefficient of the unfiltered sample from that of the 1μm filtrate. Results from the Essex estuary-coastal system of northern Massachusetts show grazing and production at rates that indicate a daily turnover of the standing crop of bacteria, with highest values in mid-estuarine waters. Experiments on the size distribution of grazing showed that microzooplankton from 1–3μm were responsible for most of the observed decrease in bacteria. It was suggested that the basic pattern of linear increase of the bacteria in the absence of grazing reflects density-dependent limitation by substrate present at the outset of the incubation and is indicative of a population that has been maintained around the mid-point of the logistic growth curve by grazing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burney CM, Johnson KM, Sieburth JMcN (1981) Diel flux of dissolved carbohydrate in a salt marsh and a simulated estuarine ecosystem. Mar Biol 63:175–187

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caron DA, Davis PG, Madin LP, Sieburth JMcN (1982) Heterotrophic bacteria and bacterivorous protozoa in oceanic macroaggregates. Science 218:795–797

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christian RR, Hanson RB, Newell SY (1982) Comparison of methods for measurement of bacterial growth rates in mixed batch cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:1160–1165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fallon RD, Newell SY, Hopkinson CS (1983) Bacterial production in marine sediments: will cell-specific measures agree with whole-system metabolism? Mar Ecol Progr Ser 11:119–127

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fenchel T (1982a) Ecology of heterotrophic microflagellates. I. Some important forms and their functional morphology. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 8:211–223

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fenchel T (1982b) Ecology of heterotrophic microflagellates. II. Bioenergetics and growth. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 8:225–231

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fenchel T (1982c) Ecology of heterotrophic microflagellates. III. Adaptations to heterogeneous environments. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 9:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fenchel T (1982d) Ecology of heterotrophic microflagellates. IV. Quantitative occurrence and importance as bacterial consumers. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 9:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fuhrman JA, Azam F (1980) Bacterioplankton secondary production estimates for coastal waters of British Columbia, Antarctica, and California, Appl Environ Microbiol 39:1085–1095

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gak DS, Romanova EP, Romanenko VI, Sorokin YI (1972) Estimation of changes in number of bacteria in the isolated water samples. In: Sorokin YI, Kadota H (eds) Microbial production and decomposition in fresh waters. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 78–82

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haas LW, Webb KL (1979) Nutritional mode of several non-pigmented microflagellates from York River Estuary, Virginia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 39:125–134

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hagstrom A, Larsson U, Horstedt P, Normark S (1979) Frequency of dividing cells, a new approach to the determination of bacterial growth rates in aquatic environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 37:805–812

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jasper S (1977) Use of Nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescent microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1225–1228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hollibaugh JT, Fuhrman JA, Azam F (1980) Radioactively labeling of natural assemblages of bacterioplankton for use in trophic studies. Limnol Oceanogr 25:172–181

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karl DM (1979) Measurement of microbial activity and growth in the ocean by rates of stable ribonucleic acid synthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 38:850–860

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kirchman D, Ducklow H, Mitchell R (1982) Estimates of bacterial growth from changes in uptake rates and biomass. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:1296–1307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Larsson U, Hagstrom A (1982) Fractionated phytoplankton primary production, exudate release and bacterial production in a Baltic eutrophication gradient. Mar Biol 67:57–70

    Google Scholar 

  18. Linley EAS, Newell RC (1981) Microheterotrophic communities associated with the degradation of kelp debris. Kieler Meeresforsch, Sonderh 5:345–355

    Google Scholar 

  19. Linley EAS, Newell RC, Bosma SA (1981) Heterotrophic utilisation of mucilage released during fragmentation of kelp (Eklonia maxima andLaminaria pallida). I. Development of microbial communities associated with the degradation of kelp mucilage. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 4:31–41

    Google Scholar 

  20. Newell RC, Lucas MI (1981) The quantitative significance of dissolved and particulate organic matter released during fragmentation of kelp in coastal waters. Kieler Meeresforsch, Sonderh 5:356–369

    Google Scholar 

  21. Newell RC, Lucas MI, Linley EAS (1981) Rate of degradation and efficiency of conversion of phytoplankton debris by marine microorganisms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 6:123–136

    Google Scholar 

  22. Newell SY, Fallon RD (1982) Bacterial productivity in the water column and sediments of the Georgia (USA) coastal zone: estimates via direct counting and parallel measurement of thymidine incorporation. Microb Ecol 8:33–46

    Google Scholar 

  23. Palumbo AV, Ferguson RL (1978) Distribution of suspended bacteria in the Newport River Estuary, N.C. Est, Coastal and Shelf sci 7:521–529

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peterson BJ, Hobbie JE, Haney JF (1978) Daphnia grazing on natural bacteria. Limnol Oceanogr 23:1039–1044

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pirt SJ (1965) The maintenance energy of bacteria in growing cultures. Proc Roy Soc (London), Ser B 163:224–231

    Google Scholar 

  26. Romanova AP, Zonoff AI (1964) On the estimation of production of bacterial biomass in the water body. Doklady Acad sci USSR 155:194–197

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sherr BF, Sherr EB (1983) Enumeration of heterotrophic microprotozoa by epifluorescence microscopy. Est, Coastal and Shelf sci 16:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sherr BF, Sherr EB, Berman T (1983) Grazing, growth, and ammonium excretion rates of a heterotrophic microflagellate fed with four species of bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:1196–1201

    Google Scholar 

  29. Somville M, Billen G (1983) A method for determining exoproteolytic activity in natural waters. Limnol Oceanogr 28:190–193

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stuart V, Lucas MI, Newell RC (1981) Heterotrophic utilisation of particulate matter from the kelpLaminaria pallida. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 4:337–348

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stuart V, Newell RC, Lucas MI (1982) Conversion of kelp debris and faecal material from the musselAulacoma ater by marine microorganisms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 7:47–57

    Google Scholar 

  32. Turner RE (1978) Community plankton respiration in a salt estuary and the importance of macrophytic leachates. Limnol Oceanogr 23:442–451

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vaatanen P (1980) Effects of environmental factors on microbial populations in brackish waters off the southern coast of Finland. Appl Environ Microbiol 40:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wetzel RG, Likens GE (1979) Limnological analyses. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  35. Williams FM (1980) On understanding predator-prey interactions. In: Ellwood DC, Hedger JN, Latham MJ, Lynch JM, Slater JH (eds) Contemporary microbial ecology. Academic Press, London, pp 349–375

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wright RT, Coffin RB (1983) Planktonic bacteria in estuaries and coastal waters of northern Massachusetts: spatial and temporal distribution. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 11:205–216

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wright RT, Coffin RB, Ersing CP, Pearson D (1982) Field and laboratory measurements of bivalve filtration of natural marine bacterioplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 27:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wright RT (in press) Dynamics of pools of dissolved organic carbon. In: Hobbie JE, Williams PJ (eds) Heterotrophy in the sea. Plenum Press, London

  39. Wright RT, Coffin RB (in press) Factors affecting bacterioplankton density and productivity in salt marsh estuaries. In: Reddy CA, Klug MJ (eds) Current perspectives in microbial ecology. Am Soc for Microbiol, Wash., D.C.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, R.T., Coffin, R.B. Measuring microzooplankton grazing on planktonic marine bacteria by its impact on bacterial production. Microb Ecol 10, 137–149 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02011421

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02011421

Keywords

Navigation