Skip to main content
Log in

Microbial symbiotes of the ambrosia beetleXyloterinus politus

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Progression in the understanding of the microecology of ambrosia beetles and their associated microorganisms is briefly reviewed. Between the 1840s and the early 1960s the concept of one ambrosial fungus per ambrosia beetle was emphasized. Some subsequent research has supported the view that each ambrosia beetle plus several associated microorganisms constitute a highly co-evolved symbiotic community. It was hypothesized in this study that such a community of symbiotic microbial species, not just one ambrosial fungus, is actively cultivated and perpetuated by the ambrosia beetleXyloterinus politus. Experimental results indicated that bacteria, yeasts, a yeastlike fungus, and ambrosial fungi compose such a symbiotic microbial complex in association withX. politus. The microecology of the ectosymbiotic microorganisms in relation to this insect is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahamson LP, Norris DM (1966) Symbiotic interrelationships between microbes and ambrosia beetles. I. The organs of microbial transport and perpetuation ofXyloterinus politus. Ann Entomol Soc Am 59:877–880

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abrahamson LP, Norris DM (1969) Symbiotic interrelationships between microbes and ambrosia beetles. IV. Ambrosial fungi associated withXyloterinus politus. J Invertebr Pathol 14: 381–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Asai T, Iizuka H, Komagata K (1964) The flagellation and taxonomy of generaGluconobacter andAcetobacter with reference to the existence of intermediate strains. J Gen Appl Microbiol 10:95–126

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baker JM (1963) Ambrosia beetles and their fungi, with particular reference toPlatypus cylindrus Fab. Symp Soc Gen Microbiol 13:232–265

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baker JM, Norris DM (1968) A complex of fungi mutualistically involved in the nutrition of the ambrosia beetleXyleborus ferrugineus. J Invertebr Pathol 11:246–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnett JA, Payne RW, Yarrow D (1983) Yeasts, characteristics and identification. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barras SJ, Perry T (1972) Fungal symbionts in the prothoracic mycangium ofDendroctonus frontalis (Coleopt.: Scolytidae). Z Angew Entomol 71:95–104

    Google Scholar 

  8. Batra LR (1963) Ecology of ambrosia fungi and their dissemination by beetles. Trans Kansas Acad Sci 66:213–236

    Google Scholar 

  9. Batra LR (1967) Ambrosia fungi: a taxonomic revision, and nutritional studies of some species. Mycologia 59:976–1017

    Google Scholar 

  10. Batra LR (1971) Two new Hemiascomycetes:Pichia crossotarsi andP. microspora. Mycologia 63:994–1001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Becking J-H (1984) GenusBeijerinckia Derx 1950, 145Al. In: Bergy's manual of systematic bacteriology, Vol 1. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 311–321

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bernt E, Gutmann I (1974) Ethanol, determination with alcohol dehydrogenase and NAD. In: Bermeyer HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis, 2nd English ed, Vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 1499–1502

    Google Scholar 

  13. Browne FG (1961) The biology of Malayan Scolytidae and Platypodidae. Malay For Rec 22: 1–254

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (eds) (1974) Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, 8th ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bushing RW (1965) A synoptic list of the parasites of Scolytidae (Coleoptera) in North America north of Mexico. Can Entomol 97:449–492

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carr JH, Passmore SM (1979) Methods for identifying acetic acid bacteria. In: Skinner FA, Lovelock DW (ed) Identification methods for biologists, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York, pp. 33–47

    Google Scholar 

  17. Conn HJ, Darrow MA, Emmel VM (eds) (1960) Staining procedures used by the biological stain commission. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crawford RL (1981) Lignin biodegradation and transformation. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. DeLay J, Swings J, Gossele F (1984) Genus 1.Acetobacter Beijerinck 1898, 215Al In: Krieg NR (ed) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, Vol 1. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 268–274

    Google Scholar 

  20. Doane RW, Gilliland OJ (1929) Three California ambrosia beetles. J Econ Entomol 22:915–921

    Google Scholar 

  21. Francke-Grosmann H (1956) Hautdrüsen als Träger der Pilzsymbiose bei Ambrosiakäfern. Z Morph & Ökol Tiere 45:275–308

    Google Scholar 

  22. Francke-Grosmann H (1967) Ectosymbiosis in wood-inhabiting insects. In: Henry SM (ed) Symbiosis, Vol II. Academic Press, New York, pp. 141–205

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gordon RE, Haynes WC, Pang CH-N (1973) The genusBacillus, Agricultural Handbook no. 427. Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gosselé F, Swings J, De Ley J (1980) A rapid, simple and simultaneous detection of 2-keto-, 5-keto and 2,5-diketogluconic acids by thin-layer chromatography in culture media of acetic acid bacteria. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg Abt 1: Orig C1: 178–181

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hartig T (1844) Ambrosia desBostrichus dispar. Allg Forst-Jagdztg 13:73–74

    Google Scholar 

  26. Henrichsen J (1972) Bacterial surface translocation: a survey and a classification. Bacteriol Rev 36:478–503

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hubbard HG (1896) Ambrosia beetles. US Dep Agric, Yearbook 1896:421–430

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hubbard HG (1897) The ambrosia beetles of the United States. US Dep Agric, Entomol Bull 7:9–30

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kabir ADMF, Giese RL (1966) The columbia timber beetle,Corthylus columbianus (Coleoptera:Scolytidae). II. Fungi and staining associated with the beetle in soft maple. Ann Entomol Soc Am 59:894–902

    Google Scholar 

  30. Keddie RM (1974) Genus III.Cellulomonas Bergey et al 1923, 154, emend. mut. char. Clark 1952, 50. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (eds) Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, 8th ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 629–631

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kreger-van Rij NJW (1973) Endomycetales, basidiomycetous yeasts, and related fungi. In: Ainsworth GC, Sparrow FK, Sussman AS (eds) The fungi, an advanced treatise, Vol IVA. Academic Press, New York, pp 11–32

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kreger-van Rij NJW (1984) 1. Key to the genera. In: Kreger-van Rij (ed) The yeasts, a taxonomic study, 3rd ed. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam, pp 967–973

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kreger-van Rij NJW, Veenhuis M (1969) Septal pores inEndomycopsis platypodis andEndomycopsis monospora. J Gen Microbiol 57:91–96

    Google Scholar 

  34. Krieg NR (ed) (1984) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, Vol 1. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lambert B, Kersters K, Gossele F, Swings J, De Ley J (1981) Gluconobacters from honey bees. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek; J Microbiol Serol 47:147–157

    Google Scholar 

  36. Leach JG, Hodson AC, Chilton SP, Christensen CM (1940) Observations on two ambrosia beetles and their associated fungi. Phytopathology 30:227–236

    Google Scholar 

  37. Leifson E (1954) The flagellation and taxonomy of species ofAcetobacter. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek; J Microbiol Serol 20:102–110

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lodder J (1970) Introduction to the chapters IV, V, VI and VII, and key to the genera. In: Lodder J (ed) The yeasts, a taxonomic study, 2nd ed. North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam, pp 114–120

    Google Scholar 

  39. MacLean DB, Giese RL (1967) The life history of the ambrosia beetleXyloterinus politus (Coleoptera:Scolytidae). Can Entomol 99:285–299

    Google Scholar 

  40. MacLean DB, Giese RL (1968) Fungi associated withXyloterinus politus (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J Invertebr Pathol 10:185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mayfield CI, Innis WE (1977) A rapid, simple method for staining bacterial flagella. Can J Microbiol 23:1311–1313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Moore GE (1971) Mortality factors caused by pathogenic bacteria and fungi of the southern pine beetle in North Carolina. J Invertebr Pathol 17:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Norris DM (1965) The complex of fungi essential to the growth and development ofXyleborus sharpi in wood. Mat Organ, Beih 1: 523–529

    Google Scholar 

  44. Norris DM (1979) How insects induce disease. In: Horsfall JG, Cowling EB (eds) Plant disease, an advanced treatise, Vol IV. How pathogens induce disease. Academic Press, New York, pp 239–255

    Google Scholar 

  45. Norris DM (1979) The mutualistic fungi ofXyleborini beetles. In: Batra LR (ed) Insect fungus symbiosis. Allanheld, Osmun and Co, Montclair, pp 53–63

    Google Scholar 

  46. Redhead SA, Malloch DW (1977) The Endomycetaceae: new concepts, new taxa. Can J Bot 55:1701–1711

    Google Scholar 

  47. Shigo AL (1967) Succession of organisms in discoloration and decay. Int Rev For Res 2:237–299

    Google Scholar 

  48. Skerman VBD (1974) A key for the determination of the generic position of organisms listed in the manual. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (eds) Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, 8th ed. Williams and Wilkins Co, Baltimore, pp 1098–1146

    Google Scholar 

  49. Smibert RM, Krieg NR (1981) Chapter 20, General characterization. In: Gerhardt (ed) Manual of methods for general bacteriology. Am Soc Microbiol, Washington, DC, pp 409–443

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stolp H, Gadkari D (1981) Chapter 61, Nonpathogenic members of the genusPseudomonas. In: Stolp MP, Trüper HG, Balows A, Schlegel HG (eds) The prokaryotes: a handbook on habitats, isolation, and identification of bacteria, Vol 1. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 729–741

    Google Scholar 

  51. van der Walt JP (1970) Chapter II, Criteria and methods used in classification. In: Lodder J (ed) The yeasts, a taxonomic study, 2nd ed. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 34–113

    Google Scholar 

  52. van der Walt JP, Yarrow D (1984) Chapter II, Methods for the isolation, maintenance, classification and identification of yeasts. In: Kreger-van Rij NJW (ed) The yeasts, a taxonomic study, 3rd ed. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam, pp 45–104

    Google Scholar 

  53. Verrall AF (1943) Fungi associated with certain ambrosia beetles. J Agric Res (Washington, DC) 66:135–144

    Google Scholar 

  54. von Arx JA (1972) OnEndomyces, Endomycopsis and related yeast-like fungi. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek; J Microbiol Serol 38:289–309

    Google Scholar 

  55. von Arx JA (1981) The genera of fungi sporulating in pure culture, 3rd ed. J Cramer, Vaduz

    Google Scholar 

  56. von Arx JA, Rodrigues de Miranda L, Smith MT, Yarrow D (1977) The genera of yeasts and yeast-like fungi. Studies in Mycology no 14. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn

    Google Scholar 

  57. von Arx JA, van der Walt JP (1976) The ascigerous state ofCandida chodatii. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek; J Microbiol Serol 42:309–314

    Google Scholar 

  58. Webb S (1945) Australian ambrosia fungi. Proc R Soc Victoria 57(ns):57–78

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wickerham LJ (1951) Taxonomy of yeasts. US Dep Agric, Tech Bull no 1029

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haanstad, J.O., Norris, D.M. Microbial symbiotes of the ambrosia beetleXyloterinus politus . Microb Ecol 11, 267–276 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010605

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010605

Keywords

Navigation