Abstract
The relative importance of three environmental variables known to influence the rate of bacterial sulfate reduction was examined using sediment from a saltmarsh pan. The variables investigated were temperature, electron donor concentration, and electron acceptor concentration. Their relative influence on the rate of bacterial sulfate reduction was examined with multiple replicate sediment samples in which the variables were experimentally adjusted. Sulfate reduction rates were measured with35SO 2−4 .
The relative importance of each variable to sulfate reduction rate was assessed with multiple regression analysis by calculating the standardized partial regression coefficients, and the results were compared with the ranges of the three variables encountered in the natural sediment. Temperature proved to have the greatest influence, followed by electron donor and electron acceptor concentrations, in that order. The sulfate concentration was shown to have little influence on sulfate reduction rate at seawater concentrations of sulfate, but its effect increased if sulfate concentrations were diminished compared to those of seawater.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdollahi, H., and D. B. Nedwell: Temperature as a factor influencing bacterial sulphate dissimilation in a saltmarsh sediment. Microbial Ecology5, 73–79 (1979)
Abram, J. W., and D. B. Nedwell: Hydrogen as a substrate for methanogenesis and sulphate reduction in anaerobic saltmarsh sediment. Arch. Microbiol.117, 93–97 (1978)
American Public Health Association: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 13th ed. Washington, D.C. (1971)
Cappenberg, T. E.: Interrelations between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria in bottom deposits of a freshwater lake. II. Inhibition experiments. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek40, 297–306 (1974)
Goldhaber, M. B., and I. R. Kaplan: The sulfur cycle. In: The Sea, edited by E. D. Goldberg, pp. 569–655. John Wiley, New York (1974)
Jorgensen, B. B.: The sulfur cycle of a coastal marine sediment. Limnol. Oceanogr.22, 814–832 (1977)
Le Gall, J., and J. R. Postgate: The physiology of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Adv. Microbiol. Physiol.10, 82–131 (1973)
Nakai, N., and M. L. Jensen: The kinetic isotope effect in the bacterial reduction and oxidation of sulfur. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta28, 1893–1912 (1964)
Nedwell, D. B., and J. W. Abram: Bacterial sulphate reduction in relation to sulphur geochemistry in two contrasting areas of saltmarsh sediment. Estuar. Coastal Mar. Sci.6, 341–351 (1978)
Nedwell, D. B., and G. D. Floodgate: The effect of microbial activity upon the sedimentary sulphur cycle. Mar. Biol.16, 192–200 (1972)
Ramm, A. E., and D. A. Bella: Sulfide production in anaerobic microcosms. Limnol. Oceanogr.19, 110–118 (1974)
Snedecor, G. W., and W. G. Cochran: Statistical Methods, 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa (1967)
Sorokin, Y. I.: Experimental investigation of bacterial sulfate reduction in the Black Sea. Microbiology32, 320–335 (1962)
Tezuka, Y.: A commensalism between the sulfate-reducing bacteriaDesulfovibrio desulfuricans and other heterotrophic bacteria. Bot. Mag. Tokyo79, 174–178 (1966)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nedwell, D.B., Abram, J.W. Relative influence of temperature and electron donor and electron acceptor concentrations on bacterial sulfate reduction in saltmarsh sediment. Microb Ecol 5, 67–72 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010580
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010580