Skip to main content
Log in

Association of rat, pig, and fowl biotypes of lactobacilli with the stomach of gnotobiotic mice

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We grouped 20 isolates of lactobacilli from the stomach of conventional rats, 21 isolates from pig stomachs, and 19 isolates from the crop of fowls according to their ability to ferment N-acetylglucosamine, dextrin, cellobiose, gum arabic, and xylan. Most of the isolates did not resemble previously describedLactobacillus species. Representative group A isolates were associated with germ-free mice. Only a rat isolate was able to colonize the keratinized squamous epithelium of the stomach of gnotobiotic mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brownlee, A., and W. Moss: The influence of diet on lactobacilli in the stomach of the rat. J. Pathol. Bacteriol.82, 513–516 (1961)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubos, R., R. W. Schaedler, R. Costello, and P. Hoet: Indigenous, normal and autochthonous flora of the gastrointestinal tract. J. Exp. Med.122, 67–76 (1965)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuller, R.: Ecological studies on the lactobacillus flora associated with the crop epithelium of the fowl. J. Appl. Bacteriol.36, 131–139 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fuller, R., and B. E. Brooker: Lactobacilli which attach to the crop epithelium of the fowl. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.27, 1305–1312 (1974)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuller, R., and A. Turvey: Bacteria associated with the intestinal wall of the fowl (Gallus domesticus). J. Appl. Bacteriol.34, 617–622 (1971)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holdeman, L. V., and W. E. C. Moore (eds.): Anaerobe Laboratory Manual, Ed. 3. Virginia Polytechnic Institute Anaerobe Laboratory, Blacksburg (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Raibaud, P., J. V. Galpin, R. Ducluzeau, G. Mocquot, and G. Oliver: Le genreLactobacillus dans le tube digestif du rat. I. Caractères des souches homofermentaires isolées de rats “holo” et “gnotoxeniques.” Ann. Microbiol. (Inst. Pasteur)124A, 83–109 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roach, S., D. C. Savage, and G. W. Tannock: Lactobacilli isolated from the stomach of conventional mice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.33, 1197–1203 (1977)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Savage, D. C.: Microbial interference between indigenous yeast and lactobacilli in the rodent stomach. J. Bacteriol.98, 1278–1283 (1969)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Savage, D. C., J. S. McAllister, and C. P. Davis: Anaerobic bacteria on the mucosal epithelium of the murine large bowel. Infect. Immunol.4, 492–502 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schaedler, R. W., and R. Dubos: The faecal flora of various strains of mice. Its bearing on their susceptibility to endotoxin. J. Exp. Med.115, 1149–1160 (1962)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Suegara, N., M. Morotomi, T. Watanabe, Y. Kawai, and M. Mutai: Behavior of microflora in the rat stomach: adhesion of lactobacilli to the keratinized epithelial cells of the rat stomach in vitro. Infect. Immunol.12, 173–179 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tannock, G. W., and J. M. B. Smith: The microflora of the pig stomach and its possible relationship to ulceration of the pars oesophagea. J. Comp Pathol.80, 359–367 (1970)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wesney, E., Tannock, G.W. Association of rat, pig, and fowl biotypes of lactobacilli with the stomach of gnotobiotic mice. Microb Ecol 5, 35–42 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010576

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010576

Keywords

Navigation