Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. III.Stenocereus thurberi

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Yeast communities in necroses of organpipe cactus (Stenocereus thurberi) were surveyed at 3 localities in Arizona. Quantitative analysis of random samples allows comparisons of the types and numbers of yeasts at 3 levels: within plants, between plants within a locality, and between localities. The analysis shows that the major source of variability is between plants. This pattern is identical with the pattern shown by agria cactus (Stenocereus gummosus) and is thought to be due to sampling different successional stages. No significant differences in estimates of the effective number of yeast species (ENS) in agria and organpipe samples were found. Comparisons of agria, organpipe, and prickly pear (Opuntia) cacti support the hypothesis that cactus chemistry is an important determinant of the yeast community structure which, in turn, is an important determinant of the diversity ofDrosophila species which utilize necrotic cacti as feeding and breeding substrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fogleman JC, Starmer WT, Heed WB (1981) Larval selectivity for yeast species byDrosophila mojavensis in natural substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:4435–4439

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fogleman JC, Starmer WT, Heed WB (1982) Comparisons of yeast florae from natural substrates and larval guts of southwesternDrosophila. Oecologia 52:187–191

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbert DG (1980) Dispersal of yeasts and bacteria byDrosophila in a temperate forest. Oecologia 46:135–137

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heed WB (1982) The orgin ofDrosophila in the Sonoran Desert. In: Barker JSF, Starmer WT (eds) Ecological genetics and evolution: the cactus-yeast-Drosophila model system. Academic Press Australia, Sydney, pp 65–80

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kircher HW (1982) Chemical composition of cacti and its relationship to Sonoran DesertDrosophila. In: Barker JSF, Starmer WT (eds) Ecological genetics and evolution: the cactus-yeast-Drosophila model system. Academic Press Australia, Sydney, pp 143–158

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kluge AG, Kerfoot WC (1973) The predictability and regularity of character divergence. Am Natur 107:426–442

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lachance MA, Starmer WT (1982) Evolutionary significance of physiological relationships among yeast communities associated with trees. Can J Bot 60:285–293

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rohlf FJ, Gilmartin AJ, Hart G (1983) The Kluge-Kerfoot phenomenon—a statistical artifact. Evol 37:180–202

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sokal RR (1978) Population differentiation: something new or more of the same. In: Brussard PF (ed) Ecological genetics: the interface. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 215–239

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. Freedman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  11. Starmer WT (1982) Analysis of the community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. I.Stenocereus gummosus. Microb Ecol 8:71–81

    Google Scholar 

  12. Starmer WT, Phaff HJ, Miranda M, Miller MW, Heed WB (1982) The yeast flora associated with the decaying stems of columnar cactus andDrosophila in North America. Evol Biol 14: 269–295

    Google Scholar 

  13. Starmer WT, Phaff HJ (1983) Analysis of the community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. II.Opuntia species. Microb Ecol 9:247–259

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vacek DC, Starmer WT, Heed WB (1979) Relevance of the ecology ofCitrus yeasts to the diet ofDrosophila. Microb Ecol 5:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van der Walt JP (1970) Criteria and methods used in classification. In: Lodder J (ed) The yeasts, a taxonomic study. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 34–113

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wasserman M (1982) Evolution of therepleta group. In: Ashbumer M, Carson HJ, Thompson JN (eds) The genetics and biology ofDrosophila, Vol 3B. Academic Press, New York, pp 61–140

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fogleman, J.C., Starmer, W.T. Analysis of the community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. III.Stenocereus thurberi . Microb Ecol 11, 165–173 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010488

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010488

Keywords

Navigation