Skip to main content
Log in

The microbial ecology of the Great Salt Lake

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Great Salt Lake is actually two lakes. A highly saline (330-gml−1) northern arm and a moderately saline (120-gml−1) southern arm separated by a semipermeable rock causeway. The lake, particularly the northern arm, has a massive accumulation of organic matter resulting from more than 100,000 years of productivity, cycling from a freshwater to a saline lake, plus the influence of human industry and agriculture in more recent times. The north arm planktonic and attached community consists principally of, in order of biomass: bacteria of at least two genera,Halobacterium andHalococcus; two algae,Dunaliella salina andD. viridis; the brine shrimp,Anemia salina; and, two species of brine fly,Ephydra gracilis andE. hians and possibly one more species. The algae and the bacteria appear to depend on each other for nutrients. The bacteria use organic matter produced by the algae and the algae use ammonia produced by the bacteria and possibly the brine shrimp. The production of ammonia appears to be the rate-limiting step although there is no shortage of other forms of nitrogen in the north arm. Based on aquarium studies, the potential for biomass production of algae and bacteria is much higher than actually observed in the north arm, leading to the postulation of two additional factors controlling population; the grazing of the algae by invertebrates with the excretion of compounds rich in nitrogen, and the effect of a low habitat temperature and winter cold on the bacteria, reducing their metabolic activities to nearly zero. Some aspects of the various organisms and their metabolism are discussed. A comparison is made with recent work on the Dead Sea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. APHA. 1971.Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 13th ed. American Public Health Association. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ben Amotz, A. and Avron, M. 1973. The role of glycerol in the osmotic regulation of the halophilic algaDunaliella parva.Plant Physiol. 51:875–878.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bond, R. M. 1933. A contribution to the study of the natural food cycle in aquatic environments.Bingham Oceanog. Collection Bull., Yale Univ. 4:1–89.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borowitzka, L. J. and Brown, A. D. 1974. The salt relations of marine and halophilic species of the unicellular green algaDunaliella, The role of glycerol as compatible solute.Arch. Microbiol. 96:37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchanan, R. E. and Gibbons, N. E. (eds). 1974. Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carozzi, A. V. 1962. Observations on algal biostromes in the Great Salt Lake, Utah.J. Geol. 70:246–252.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chapman, K. F. 1971. The Insects: Structure and Function, 2nd Ed. American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc. N. Y., N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clegg, J. S. 1964. The control of emergence and metabolism by external osmotic pressure and the role of free glycerol in developing cysts ofArtemia salina.J. Exp. Biol. 41:879–892.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Collins, V. G. 1963. The distribution and ecology of bacteria in freshwater.Proc. Soc. Water Treatment and Examination 12:40–73.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Copeland, B. J. 1967. Environmental characteristics of hypersaline lagoons.Univ. of Texas Contributions in Marine Science 12:207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Croghan, P. C. 1958. The mechanism of osmotic regulation inArtemia salina (L): The physiology of the branchiae.J. Exp. Biol. 35:223–242.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Danon, A. and Stoeckenius, W. 1974. Photophosphorylation inHalobacterium halobium.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 71:1234–1238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deevey, Jr., E. S. 1973. Sulfur, nitrogen and carbon in the biosphere.In: Carbon and the Biosphere, G. M. Woodwell and E. V. Pecan, editors. Atomic Energy Commission Symposium Series 30, United States Atomic Energy Commission.

  14. Eardley, A. J. 1966. Sediments of Great Salt Lake.In: Guidebook to the Geology of Utah Number 20.The Great Salt Lake. W. L. Stokes, editor. Utah Geological and Mineral Survey. Salt Lake City, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gilchrist, B. M. 1954. Haemoglobin inArtemia.Royal Soc. London Proc., Series B. 143:136–146.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gilchrist, B. M. and Green, J. 1960. The pigments ofArtemia.Royal Soc. London, Proc., Series B. 152:118–136.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Handy, A. H. and Hahl, D. C. 1966. Great Salt Lake: Chemistry of the water.In: Guidebook to the Geology of Utah Number 20. W. L. Stokes, editor. Utah Geological and Mineral Survey. Salt Lake City, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hutchinson, G. E. 1957.A Treatise on Limnology. Vol. 1. John Wiley and Sons. N. Y., N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kao, O. H. W., Berns, D. S. and Town, W. R. 1973. The characterization of C-Phycocyanin from an extremely halo-tolerant blue-green alga,Coccochloris elebans.Biochem. J. 131:39–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaplan, I. R. and Friedmann, A. 1970. Biological productivity in the Dead Sea. I. Microorganisms in the water column.Israel J. Chem,8:513–528.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplan I.R. and Baedecker, M. J. 1970. Biological productivity in the Dead Sea. II. Evidence for phosphatidyl glycerophosphate lipid in sediment.Israel J. Chem. 8:529–533.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kramer, J. S., Herbes, S. E. and Allen, H. E. 1972. Phosphorous, analysis of water biomass and sediment.In: Nutrients in Natural Waters. H. E. Allen and J. R. Kramer, editors. Wiley-Interscience. N. Y., N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kudo, R. R. 1946. Protozoology. 3rd Ed. Charles C. Thomas. Springfield, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Larsen, H. 1967. Biochemical aspects of extreme halophilism.Advan. Microbiol. Physiol. 1:97–132.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Martens, C. S. and Berner, R. A. 1974. Methane production in interstitial waters of sulfatedepleted marine sediments.Science 185: 1167–1169.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Meglitsch, P. 1967. Invertebrate Zoology. Oxford University Press. London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Morrison, R. B. 1966. Predecessors of Great Salt Lake,In: Guidebook to the Geology of Utah Number 20. W. L. Stokes, editor. Utah Geological and Mineral Survey, Salt Lake City, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nissenbaum, A. 1975. The microbiology and biogeochemistry of the Dead Sea.Microbial Ecol. 2:139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nixon, S. W. 1969. Characteristics of some hypersaline ecosystems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Onishi, H., McCance, M. E. and Gibbons, N. E. 1965. A synthetic medium for extremely halophilic bacteria.Can. J. Microbiol. 11:365–373.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Onishi, H. and Gibbons, N. E. 1965. Some observations on the stimulative effect of ammonium ion on the growth ofHalobacterium cutirubrum.Can. J. Microbiol. 11:1032–1034.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Porcella, D. B. and Holman, J. A. 1972. Nutrients, algal growth and culture of brine shrimp in the southern Great Salt Lake.In: Great Salt Lake and Utah's Water Resources. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference of the Utah Section American Water Resources Association. Utah Water Research Laboratory, Logan, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Post, F. J. 1975. Life in the Great Salt Lake.Utah Science 36:43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Solórzano, L. 1969. Determination of ammonia in natural water by the phenol hypochlorite method.Limnol. Oceanog. 14:799–801.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stephens, D. W. and Gillespie, D. M. 1972. Community structure and ecosystem analysis of the Great Salt Lake.In: Great Salt Lake and Utah's Water Resources. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference of the Utah Section American Water Resources Association. Utah Water Research Laboratory. Logan, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stephens, D. W. and Gillespie, D. M. 1976. Phytoplankton production in the Great Salt Lake, Utah, and a laboratory study of algal response to enrichment.Limnol. Oceanog. 21:74–87.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Strickland, J. D. H. and Parsons, T. R. 1972. A practical handbook of seawater analysis.Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bull. 167. 2nd Ed. Ottawa, Canada.

  38. Stube, J. 1976. Microcosm simulation of nitrogen cycling in the Great Salt Lake. Unpublished Master of Science Thesis. Utah State University.

  39. Van Auken, O. W. and McNulty, I. B. 1973. The effect of environmental factors on the growth of a halophilic species of algae.Biol. Bull. 145:210–222.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Walker, K. F., Williams, W. D. and Hammer, U. T. 1970. The Miller method for oxygen determination applied to saline lakes.Limnol. Oceanog. 15:814–815.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Post, F.J. The microbial ecology of the Great Salt Lake. Microb Ecol 3, 143–165 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010403

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010403

Keywords

Navigation