Summary
Intrapopulational variation on interspecific crossing ability betweenD. melanogaster andD. simulans has been measured. When themelanogaster females andsimulans males were crossed, hybridization ranged from 3 to 34%, the female component of variation being more important than the male component. This point is discussed in relation with the role played by each sex in sexual isolation.
Literatur
Spieth, H.T., Evol. Biol.2 (1968) 157; Kaneshiro, K.Y., Evolution30 (1976) 740; Watanabe, T.K., and Kawanishi, M., Science205 (1979) 906.
Sturtevant, A.H., Genetics5 (1919) 488.
Watanabe, T.K., personal communication.
Snedecor, G.W., and Cochran, W.G., in: Statistical Methods. Iowa University Press, Ames, 1967.
Parsons, P.A., Can. J. Genet. Cytol.14 (1972) 77.
Falconer, D.S., in: Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London 1960.
Spieth, H.T., Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist.99 (1952) 395; Spieth, H.T., A. Rev. Ent.19 (1974) 385.
Bateman, A.J., Evolution3 (1949) 174; Merrell, D.J., Genetics34 (1949) 370.
Wood, D., and Ringo, J.M., Evolution34 (1980) 320.
Manning, A., Anim. Behav.7 (1959) 60.
Petit, C., and Ehrman, L., Evol. Biol.2 (1968) 157; Spiess, E.B., in: Essays in Evolution and Genetics in honor of Th. Dobzhansky. North Holland Publ., Amsterdam 1970; Spieth, H.T., A. Rev. Ent.19 (1974) 385.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carracedo, M.C., Casares, P. Intrapopulational genetic variation in the hybridization between Drosophila melanogaster females and D. simulans males. Experientia 41, 106–108 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02005900
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02005900