Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Piperacillin/tazobactam/amikacin versus piperacillin/amikacin/teicoplanin in the empirical treatment of neutropenic patients

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective randomized trial was performed to compare the efficacy of a regimen containing a glycopeptide versus one containing a beta-lactamase inhibitor in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients. Fifty-eight patients received piperacillin/amikacin/teicoplanin (group 1) and 56 received piperacillin/amikacin/tazobactam (group 2). In the case of persistence of fever without microbiological documentation of the cause, teicoplanin was also given empirically in group 2 on day 4, and amphotericin B in both groups on day 6. In 114 evaluable febrile episodes, the rate of success without modification of therapy was 60 % in patients on piperacillin/amikacin/teicoplanin and 41 % in patients on piperacillin/amikacin/tazobactam (p<0.03). Eleven of 34 patients in the latter group who failed to improve eventually responded upon addition of teicoplanin. Ten and nine patients in group 1 and group 2 respectively required the addition of amphotericin B for definite improvement. There were 14 episodes of gram-positive septicemia in each group: the response rate was 100 % in group 1 and 43 % in group 2. Three episodes of gram-negative breakthrough septicemia occurred in group 1 versus no cases in group 2 (p=0.1). Three deaths occurred in each group. Piperacillin/amikacin/tazobactam may be as efficacious as piperacillin/amikacin/teicoplanin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients provided the regimen is modified (usually by addition of teicoplanin) in unresponsive cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rogers TR Management of septicaemia in the immunocompromised with particular reference to neutropenic patients. In: Shanson DC (ed): Septicaemia and endocarditis. Clinical and microbiological aspects. Oxford Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1990, p. 113–142.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Young LS Combination or single drug therapy for gram-negative sepsis. In: Remington JS, Swartz MN (ed): Current clinical topics in infectious diseases. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. GIMEMA Infection Program Prevention of bacterial infection in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies. A randomized, multicenter trial comparing norfloxacin with ciprofloxacin. Annals of Internal Medicine 1991, 115: 712–717.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karp JE, Dick JD, Angelopulos C, Charache P, Green L, Burke PJ, Saral R Empiric use of vancomycin during prolonged treatment-induced granulocytopenia. American Journal of Medicine 1986, 81: 237–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martino P, Micozzi A, Gentile G, Raccah R, Girmenia C, Mandelli F Piperacillin plus amikacin versus piperacillin plus amikacin plus teicoplanin for the empiric treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients on quinolones prophylaxis. Clinical Infectious Disease 1992, 15: 290–294.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giuliano M, Pantosti A, Gentile G, Venditti M, Arcese W, Martino P Effects on oral and intestinal microflora of pefloxacin for selective decontamination in bone marrow transplant patients. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1989, 33: 1709–1713.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Venditti M, Santini C, Serra P, Micozzi A, Gentile G, Martino P Comparative in vitro activities of new fluorinated quinolones and other antibiotics against coagulase negative staphylococcus blood isolates from neutropenic patients and relationship between susceptibility and slime production. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1989, 33: 209–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Venditti M, Baiocchi P, Santini C, Brandimarte C, Serra P, Gentile G, Girmenia C, Martino P Antimicrobial susceptibilities ofStreptococcus species that cause septicaemia in neutropenic patients. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1989, 33: 580–582.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Archer GL Staphylococcus epidermidis: the organism, its diseases and treatment. In: Remington JS, Swartz MN (ed): Current clinical topics in infectious diseases. Volume 5. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984, p. 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rubin M, Hathorn JW, Marshall D, Gress J, Steinberg SM, Pizzo PA Gram-positive infections and the use of vancomycin in 550 episodes of fever and neutropenia. Annals of Internal Medicine 1988, 108: 30–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Micozzi A, Venditti M, Amadori S, Pulsoni A, Tirindelli C, Martino P Teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive bacteraemia in neutropenic patients. British Journal of Haematology 1990, 76, Supplement 2: 19–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubin RH Empiric antibacterial therapy in granulocytopenia induced by cancer chemotherapy. Annals of Internal Medicine 1988, 108: 134–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group, and the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Vancomycin added to empirical combination antibiotic therapy for fever in granulocytopenic cancer patients. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1991, 163: 951–958.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Henslee J, Bostrom B, Weidorf D, Ramsay N, McGlove P, Kersey J Streptococcal sepsis in bone marrow transplant patients. Lancet 1984, i: 393.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ognibene FO, Martin FE, Parker MM, Schlesinger T, Roach P, Burch C, Shelhamer JH, Parrillo JE Adult respiratory distress syndrome in patients with severe neutropenia. New England Journal of Medicine 1986, 315: 547–551.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shenep JL, Hughes WT, Robertson PK, Blankenship KR, Baker DK, Meyer WH, Gigliotti F, Sixbey JW, Santana VM, Feldman S, Lott L Vancomycin, ticarcillin and amikacin compared with ticarcillin-clavulanate and amikacin in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic children with cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 1988, 319: 1053–1058.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobs MR, Aronoff SC, Johenning S, Yamabe S Comparative activities of the beta-lactamase inhibitors YTR 830, clavulanate and sulbactam combined with extended-spectrum penicillins against ticarcillin-resistantEnterobacteriaceae and pseudomonads. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1986, 18: 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Knapp CC, Sierra Madero J, Washington JA Activity of ticarcillin/clavulanate and piperacillin/tazobactam (YTR 830, CL 298,741) against clinical isolates and against mutants dereppressed for class I beta-lactamase. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 1989, 12: 511–515.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eliopoulos GM, Klimm K, Ferraro MJ, Jacoby GA, Moellering RC Comparative in vitro activity of piperacillin combined with the beta-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam (YTR 830). Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 1989, 12: 481–488.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fass RJ, Prior RB Comparative in vitro activities of piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin-clavulanate. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1988, 33: 1268–1274.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jones RN, Pfaller MA, Fuchs PC, Aldridge K, Allen SD, Gerlach EH Piperacillin/tazobactam (YTR 830) combination. Comparative antimicrobial activity against 5889 recent aerobic clinical isolates and 60Bacteroides fragilis group strains. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 1989, 12: 489–494.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kuck NA, Jacobus NV, Petersen PJ, Weiss WJ, Testa RT Comparative in vitro and in vivo activities of piperacillin combined with the beta-lactamase inhibitors tazobactam, clavulanic acid and sulbactam. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1989, 33: 1964–1969.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barry AL, Thornsberry C Susceptibility test: diffusion test procedures. In: Lennette EH, Balows A, Hansler WJ, Shadomy HJ (ed): Manual of clinical microbiology. American Society of Microbiology, Washington, DC, 1985, p. 978–987.

    Google Scholar 

  24. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Tentative standard M7-T12. NCCLS, Villanova, PA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krogstad DJ, Moellering RC Combination of antibiotics, mechanisms of interaction against bacteria. In: Lorian V (ed): Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1980, p. 298–341.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bodey GP Evolution of antibiotic therapy for infection in neutropenic patients: studies at M.D. Anderson Hospital. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1989, 11, Supplement 7: 1582–1590.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Serra P, Santini C, Venditti M, Mandelli F, Martino P Superinfections during antimicrobial treatment with betalactam-aminoglicoside combinations in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies. Infection 1985, 13, Supplement 1: 115–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Micozzi, A., Nucci, M., Venditti, M. et al. Piperacillin/tazobactam/amikacin versus piperacillin/amikacin/teicoplanin in the empirical treatment of neutropenic patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 12, 1–8 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01997049

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01997049

Keywords

Navigation