Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in ovarian function after tubal sterilization

  • Published:
Advances in Contraception

Abstract

Changes in ovarian function were evaluated in 43 women, before and after tubal ligation. Midluteal endocrine profiles and endometrial biopsies were investigated before and at 3, 6 and 12 months after the operations. During postoperative follow-up there was significant increase in luteal phase deficiency and midluteal FSH, LH and E2 levels (p<0.001). Progesterone levels significantly decreased (p<0.001) and anovulation was observed in 13 (30.2%) of 43 cases. Our data suggest that tubal sterilization carried increased risk in ovarian function, particularly luteal phase deficiency and anovulation.

Resumé

Les modifications de al fonction ovarienne ont été évaluées chez 43 femmes, avant et après la ligature des trompes. Des profils endocriniens midluténiques et des biopsies de l'endomètre ont été étudiés avant l'intervention et 3, 6 et 12 mois après. Durant la période de suivi postopératoire, on a constaté une augmentation significative de carence au cours de la phase lutéle et des niveaux de l'hormone folliculostimulante, de l'hormone lunéinisante et de E2 au milieu de la phase lutéale (p<0,001). Les niveaux de progestérone ont significativement baissé (p<0.001) et l'absence d'ovulation a été observée chez 13 (30,2%) des 43 cas. Nos résultats laissent penser que la stérilisation tubaire présente un risque accru pour la fonction ovarienne, notamment une carence dans la phase lutéale et l'anovulation.

Resumen

Las modificaciones de la función ovárica se evaluaron en 43 mujeres, antes y después de ligarse las trompas. Se investigaron los perfiles en la mitad de la fase lútea y las biopsias del endometrio antes de la intervención y a los 3, 6 y 12 meses posteriores. Durante el período de seguimiento postoperatorio, se verificó un aumento significativo de carencia en el curso de la fase lútea y de los niveles de la hormona foliculoestimulante, la hormona luteinizante y E2 en la mitad de la fase lútea (p<0,001). Los niveles de progesterona disminuyeron significativamente (p<0,001) y se observó falta de ovulación en 13 (30,2%) de los 43 casos. Nuestros resultados hacen pensar que la esterilización de las trompas presenta un riesgo mayor para la función ovárica, en particular, carencia en la fase lútea y anovulación.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cattanach J. Oestrogen deficiency after tubal ligation. Lancet. 1985;847.

  2. Ringrose CAD. Post tubal ligation menorrhagia and pelvic pain. Int J Fertil. 1974;19:168.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cattanach J. Oestrogen deficiency following tubal ligation. Med J Aust. 1984;140:309.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neil JR, Hammond GT, Noble AD. Late complications of sterilization by laparoscopy and tubal ligation. Lancet. 1975;699.

  5. Donnez J, Wauters M, Thomas K. Luteal function after tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57(1):65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanchez FA, Segal SJ, Branche V et al. Pituitary ovarian function after tubal ligation. Fertil Steril. 1981;36(5):606.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rulin MC, Turner JH, Dunworth R, Thompson D. Post tubal sterilization syndrome. A misnomer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Stefano F, Perlman JA, Peterson HB, Diamond EL. Long term risk of menstrual disturbances after tubal sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;152:835.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Whitelaw RG. 10 year survey of 485 sterilizations. Br Med J. 1979;1:32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liberman BA, Gordon AG, Bostock JF et al. Laparoscopic sterilization with spring loaded clips. Double puncture technique. J Reprod Med. 1977;18:241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kasondre JM, Bonnar J. Effect of sterilization on menstrual blood loss. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;83:572.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Templeton AA, Cole S. Hysterectomy following sterilization. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;89:845.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fortney JA, Cole LP, Kennedy KL. A new approach to measuring menstrual pattern change after sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;147:830.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Radwanska E, Berger GS, Hammond J. Luteal deficiency among women with normal menstrual cycles, requesting reversal of tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;54:189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abraham GE, Maroulis GB, Marshall JR. Evaluation of ovulation and corpus luteum function using measurements of plasma progesterone. Obstet Gynecol. 1974;44:552.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shangold M, Berkeley A. Both midluteal serum progesterone levels and late luteal endometrial histology should be assessed in all infertile women. Fertil Steril. 1983;40:627.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Balash J, Vanrell JA, Marzuez M et al. Luteal phase in infertility. Problems of evaluation. Int J Fertil. 1982;27:60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rioux JE. Late complications of female sterilization. A review of literature and a proposal for further research. J Reprod Med. 1977;19:329.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hakverdi, A.U., Taner, C.E., Erden, A.C. et al. Changes in ovarian function after tubal sterilization. Adv Contracept 10, 51–56 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01986530

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01986530

Keywords

Navigation