Skip to main content
Log in

Bovine microvascular endothelial cells of separate morphology differ in growth and response to the action of interferon-γ

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Five cell types recently isolated from the bovine corpus luteum differed in their epithelioid morphology and their cytoskeleton, but shared common criteria of microvascular endothelial cells1,2. To give strong evidence for the separate entity, the growth rate of the 5 phenotypically different cells was studied. They were seeded at low density on day 0. Most of these cells were treated with 200 to 1000 U recombinant bovine interferon-γ (IFN-γ) for 3 days. The untreated remainder served as controls. Cell counts were made for all cultures on days 4, 7, 10 and 13. morphology: 13 d after treatment with IFN-γ senescent cells as well as intact cells occurred in cultures of cell types 1 to 4. Cultures of cell type 5 were apparently unchanged and resembled their untreated counterparts. Desminpositive cells in cultures of cell type 2 developed cell processes. Growth rate: In the absence of IFN-γ, the growth rate was high for cell types 3 and 4, moderate for cell type 1, and low for cell types 2 and 5. The presence of IFN-γ caused anti-proliferative effects. These were higher for cell types 3 and 4 than for cell types 1 and 2. IFN-γ could be cytotoxic on cell type 3. In contrast, the cytokine tended to support the cell growth of cell type 5. These findings substantiate the postulate that endothelial cells exhibiting separate morphology in culture also function differently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spanel-Borowski, K., and van der Bosch, J., Cell Tissue Res.261 (1990) 35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fenyves, A. M., Behrens, J., and Spanel-Borowski, K., J. Cell Sci.106 (1993) 879.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beilke, M. A., Rev. infect. Dis.11 (1989) 273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pober, J. S., and Cotran, R. S., Physiol. Rev.70 (1990) 427.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ücer, U., Bartsch, H., Scheurich, P., and Pfizenmaier, K., Int. J. Cancer36 (1985) 103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stolpen, A. H., guinan, E. C., Fiers, W., and Pober, J. S., Am. J. Path.123 (1986) 16.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Friesel, R., Komoriya, A., and Maciag, T., J. Cell Biol.104 (1987) 689.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsuruoka, N., Sugiyama, M., Tawaragi, Y., Tsujimoto, M., Nishihara, T., Goto T., and Sato, N., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun.155 (1988) 429.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ager, A., in: The Endothelium, p. 273. Wiley-Liss, New York 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saegusa, Y., Ziff, M., Welkovich, L., and Cavener, D., J. Cell Physiol.142 (1990) 488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerritsen, M. E., Biochem. Pharmac36 (1987) 2701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar, S., West, D. C., and Ager, A., Differentiation36 (1987) 57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zetter, B. R., in: Endothelial Cells, Vol. 2, p. 63. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Spanel-Borowski, K., Cell Tissue Res.266 (1991) 37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Diglio, C. A., Grammas, P., Giacomelli F., and Wiener, J., Tissue Cell20 (1988) 477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rupnick, M. A., Carey, A., and Williams, S. K., In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.24 (1988) 435.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Furuya, S., Edwards C., and Ornberg R., Tissue Cell22 (1990) 615.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stolz, D. B., and Jacobson, B. S., In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.27A (1991) 169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vlodavsky, I., Johnson, L. K., Greenbrug, G., and Gospodarowicz, D., J. Cell Biol.83 (1979) 468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gospodarowicz D., and Ill, C., J. clin. Invest.65 (1980) 1351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Greenburg, G., Vlodavsky, I., Foidart, J. M., and Gospodarowicz, D., J. Cell Physiol.103 (1980) 333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gospodarowicz, D., and Lui, G.-M., J. Cell Physiol.109 (1981) 69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rhodin, J. A. G., J. Ultrastruct. Res.18 (1967) 181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rhodin, J. A. G., J. Ultrastruct. Res.25 (1968) 452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ley, K., Gaehtgens, P., and Spanel-Borowski, K., Microvasc. Res.43 (1992) 119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mayerhofer, A., Spanel-Borowski, K., Watkins, S., and Gratzl, M., Expl. Cell Res.201 (1992) 545.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shimada, Y., Kaji, K., Ito, H., Noda, K., and Matsuo, M., J. Cell Physiol.142 (1990) 31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shimada, Y., Ito, H., Kaji, K., and Fukuda M., Mech. Ageing Dev.55 (1990) 245.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Amador, J.-F., Vazquez, A. M., Cabrera, L., Barral, A. M., Gendelman, R., and Jondal, M., Nat. Immun. Cell Growth Regul.10 (1991) 207.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sato, N., Nariuchi, H., Tsuruoka, N., Nishihara T., Beitz, J. G., Calabresi, P., Frackelton A. R., Jr., J. invest. Dermatol.95 (1990) 85S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shimada, Y., Kaji, K., and Ito, H., Artery18 (1991) 168.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bagavandoss, P., and Wilks, J. W., Biol. Reprod.44 (1991) 1132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fenyves, A.M., Saxer, M. & Spanel-Borowski, K. Bovine microvascular endothelial cells of separate morphology differ in growth and response to the action of interferon-γ. Experientia 50, 99–104 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01984942

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01984942

Key words

Navigation