Skip to main content
Log in

The in vitro and in vivo activity of ciprofloxacin

  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin (Bay o 9867) was compared with those of norfloxacin, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cefaclor, sisomicin and cefotaxime in in vitro and mouse protection studies. Approximately 300 clinical isolates of clinically important gram-positive and gram-negative species were used. The median MICs of ciprofloxacin against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria ranged from ≤0.015–1 mg/l. Ciprofloxacin was 2–8 fold more active than norfloxacin and 100-fold more active than nalidixic acid. It also had a wider spectrum of activity against gram-positive organisms including even enterococci. No cross-resistance was observed between ciprofloxacin andβ-lactam antibiotics or aminoglycosides. Only acidic pH conditions decreased its activity. Ciprofloxacin showed rapid bactericidal action against organisms in both the logarithmic and stationary growth phases. In mouse protection studies (intraperitoneal infection) ciprofloxacin was significantly more effective than norfloxacin, ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and also showed excellent activity againstPseudomonas infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ito, A., Hirai, K., Inoue, M., Koga, H., Suzue, S., Irikura, T., Mitsuhashi, S.: In vitro antibacterial activity of AM-715, a new nalidixic acid analog. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1980, 17: 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shimizu, M., Takase, Y., Nakamura, S., Katae, H., Inoue, S., Minami, A., Nakata, K., Sakaguchi, Y.: AT-2266, a new oral antipseudomonal agent. In: Nelson, J. D., Grassi, C. (ed.): Current chemotherapy and infectious disease. American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C., 1980, p. 451–454.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sato, K., Matsuura, Y., Inoue, M., Une, T., Osada, Y., Ogawa, H., Mitsuhashi, S.: In vitro and in vivo activity of DL-8280, a new oxazine derivative. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1982, 22: 548–553.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shimizu, M., Takase, Y., Nakamura, S., Katae, H., Minami, A., Nakata, K., Inoue, S., Ishiyama, M., Kubo, Y.: Pipemidic acid, a new antibacterial agent active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: in vitro properties. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1975, 8: 132–138.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wise, R., Andrews, J. M., Edwards, L. J.: In vitro activity of Bay o 9867, a new quinoline derivative, compared with those of other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1983, 23: 559–564.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bauernfeind, A., Petermüller, C.: In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and nalidixic acid. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 2: 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeiler, H.J., Grohe, K. The in vitro and in vivo activity of ciprofloxacin. Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 3, 339–343 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01977490

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01977490

Keywords

Navigation