Skip to main content
Log in

Organismal and individualistic concepts and the choice of methods of vegetation analysis

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Blackman, G. E. &Rutter, A. J., 1946 — Physiological and ecological studies in the analysis of plant environment I. The light factor and the distribution of the bluebell (Scilla non-scripta) in woodland communities.Ann. Bot. Lond., N. S. 10: 361–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. R. &Curtis, J. T., 1957 — An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin.Ecol. Monogr. 27: 325–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, F. E., 1916 — Plant succession: an analysis of the development of Vegetation.Publ. Carneg. Inst. 242.

  • Curtis, J. T. &McIntosh, R. P., 1950 — The interrelation of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters.Ecology 31: 434–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagnelie, P., 1960 — Contribution à l'étude des communautés végétales par l'analyse factorielle.Bull. Serv. Carte. phytogeogr. Ser. B. 5: 7–71 & 93–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, H. A., 1926 — The individualistic concept of the plant association.Bull. Torrey bot. Cl. 53: 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, D. W., 1953 — Objective methods for the classification of vegetation I. The use of positive interspecific correlation.Aust. J. Bot. 1: 39–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, D. W., 1954 — Objective methods for the classification of vegetation II. An essay in the use of factor analysis.Aust. J. Bot. 2: 304–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. E., 1961 — The application of certain aspects of multivariate analysis to plant ecology. Recent Advances in Botany, 2: pp. 1350–1354. Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, A. G., 1920 — The classification of vegetation and the concept of development.J. Ecol. 8: 118–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. A., 1954 — Is the classification of plant communities either possible or desirable?Bot. Tidsskr. 51: 362–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. T. &Lambert, J. M., 1959 — Multivariate methods in plant ecology. I. Association-analysis in plant communities.J. Ecol. 47: 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. T. &Lambert, J. M., 1961 — Multivariate methods in plant ecology. III. Inverse association-analysis.J. Ecol. 49: 717–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. T., Lambert, J. M. &Lance, G. N., 1966 — Multivariate methods in plant ecology. V. Similarity analyses and information-analysis.J. Ecol. 54: 427–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarranton, G. A., 1967a — Principal components analysis of data from saxicolous bryophyte vegetation at Steps Bridge, Devon. I. A quantitative assessment of variation in the vegetation.Can. J. Bot. 45: 93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarranton, G. A., 1967b — Principal components analysis of data from saxicolous bryophyte vegetation at Steps Bridge, Devon. III. Correlation of variation in the vegetation with environmental variables.Canad. J. Bot. 45: 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by National Research Council grant A–2910 and an Ontario Department of University Affairs grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yarranton, G.A. Organismal and individualistic concepts and the choice of methods of vegetation analysis. Plant Ecol 15, 113–116 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01976244

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01976244

Keywords

Navigation