Skip to main content
Log in

Tests for additive heteroskedasticity: Goldfeld and Quandt revisited

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of new tests for heteroskedasticity have recently become available. Using Monte Carlo methods this paper explores the small sample properties of some of these tests in the context of additive heteroskedasticity. Lagrange multiplier and Wald tests (and variants thereof) are found to be inferior to the likelihood ratio and Goldfeld and QuandtF tests. This is a reconfirmation of the conclusions obtained byGoldfeld/Quandt [1972] in their study of additive heteroskedasticity. The paper also contains some new results onAmemiya's GLS estimator of the additive heteroskedastic structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya, T.: A Note on a Heteroskedastic Model. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 6, 1977, 365–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T.S.: Some Aspects of Statistical Inference for Econometrics. Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University, Canberra 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Useful Invariance Results for Generalized Regression Models. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 13, 1980, 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T.S., undA.R. Pagan: The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 47, 1980, 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: A Simple Test for Heteroskedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation. Econometrica, Vol. 47, 1979, 1287–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buse, A.: Goodness of Fit in the Seemingly Unrelated Regressions Model: A Generalization. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 10, 1979, 109–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -: Tests for Additive Heteroskedasticity. Some Monte Carlo Results. Discussion Paper 82-113, University of Alberta 1982.

  • Fisher, G.R.: Iterative Solutions and Heteroskedasticity in Regression Analysis. Review of the International Statistical Institute, Vol. 30, 1962, 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glejser, H.: A New Test for Heteroskedasticity. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 64, 1969, 316–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, L.G.: Testing for Multiplicative Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 8, 1978, 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfeld, S.M., andR.E. Quandt: Nonlinear Methods in Econometrics, Amsterdam, North-Holland 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Some Tests for Homoskedasticity. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 60, 1965, 539–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M.J., andB.P.M. McCabe: A Test for Heteroskedasticity Based on Ordinary Least Squares Residuals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 74, 1979, 494–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A.C.: Estimating Regression Models with Multiplicative Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica Vol. 44, 1976, 461–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A.C., and I.D. McAvinchey: The Small Sample Efficiency of Two-Step Estimators in Regression Models with Autoregressive Disturbances. Dicussion Paper 78-110, University of British Columbia 1978.

  • Harvey, A.C., andG.D.A. Phillips: A Comparison of the Power of Some Tests for Heteroskedasticity in the General Linear Model. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 2, 1974, 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, M.C.: Data Mining. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 65, 1983, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R.E.: Estimation with Heteroskedastic Error Terms, Econometrica, Vol. 34, 1966, p. 888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R.E., andB.M. Mitchell: Estimating the Autocorrelated Error Model with Trended Data. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 13, 1980, 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M.J.D.: An Efficient Method for Finding the Minimum of a Function of Several Variables Without Calculating Derivatives. Computer Journal, Vol. 7, 1964, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, S.: Contributions to Bayesian Analysis in Heteroskedastic Models. Ph. D. thesis, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutemiller, H.C., andD.A. Bowers: Estimation in a Heteroskedastic Regression Model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 63, 1968, 552–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvey, S.D.: Statistical Inference, Chapman-Hall, London 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szroeter, J.: A Class of Parametric Tests for Heteroskedasticity in Linear Econometric Models. Econometrica, Vol. 46, 1978, 1311–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H.: Principles of Econometrics, Wiley, New York 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H.: A Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, Vol. 48, 1980, 817–838.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buse, A. Tests for additive heteroskedasticity: Goldfeld and Quandt revisited. Empirical Economics 9, 199–216 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01973032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01973032

Keywords

Navigation