Skip to main content
Log in

Immunocytochemical reaction of a haemocyanin antibody in the midgut gland ofNautilus (Cephalopoda, Tetrabranchiata)

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The branchial gland of the dibranchiate cephalopods is described as the site of haemocyanin synthesis. Because there is no equivalent to this organ in tetrabranchiate cephalopods the localization of haemocyanin synthesis remained unknown for a long time. In this study we could confirm the conclusions from prelimnary investigations concerning the copper content of the midgut gland ofNautilus, which gave the first indications for a possible localization of haemocyanin synthesis in this organ. We developed a polyclonal antibody againstNautilus haemocyanin, tested its specificity, and used it on ultra-thin sections of the tissue of the midgut gland. It could be shown that there is a clear imunogold precipitation only on the triangular basal cells in the terminal alveoli. All the other types of cell in this organ were free of any immunoreactivity. It can be supposed that the triangular basal cells in the terminal alveoli of the midgut gland are the sites of haemocyanin synthesis inNautilus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fahrenbach, W. H., J. Cell Biol.44 (1970) 457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Markl, J., Stumpp, S., Bosch, F. X. and Voit, R., in: Invertebrate Dioxygen Carriers, pp. 497–503. Eds G. Préaux and R. Lontie. Leuven University Press, Leuven 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Préaux, G., Vandamme, A., Béthune, B., Jacobs, M. P., and Lontie, R., in: Invertebrate Oxygen Carriers, pp. 485–488. Ed. B. Linzen. Springer Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Senkbeil, E. G., and Wriston, J. C. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.68B (1981) 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hennecke, R., Gellissen, G., Spindler-Barth, M., and Spindler, K. D., in: Invertebrate Dioxygen Carriers, pp. 503–506. Eds G. Préaux and R. Lontie. Leuven University Press, Leuven 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ghiretti-Magaldi, A., Milanesi, C., and Salvato, B., Experientia29 (1973) 1265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sminia, T., and Boer, H. H., Z. Zellforsch.145 (1973) 443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sminia, T., and Vlugt-van Daalen, J. E., Cell Tissue Res.183 (1977) 299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dilly, P. N., and Messenger, J. B., Z. Zellforsch.132 (1972) 193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schipp, R., Höhn, P., and Ginkel, G., Z. Zellforsch.139 (1973) 253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taki, I., J. Fac. Fish. Anim. Husb.5 (1964) 345.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saure, H., Schipp, R., and Magnier, Y., Zool. Jb. Anat.116 (1987) 39.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruth, P., Schipp, R., and Klüssendorf, B., Zoomorphology108 (1988) 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Linné, K., Systema Naturae10 (1758) Stockholm.

  15. Bradford, M. M., Analyt. Biochem.72 (1976) 248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Friemel, H., Immunologische Arbeitsmethoden. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McKinney, M. M., and Parkinson, A., J. Immun. Meth.96 (1987) 271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ouchterlony, Ö., and Nilsson, L. A., in: Handbook of Experimental Immunology. Ed. D. M. Weir. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Laemmli, U. K., Nature, Lond.227 (1970) 680.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Humphrey, C. D., and Pittman, F. E., Stain Technology49 (1974) 9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reynolds, E. S., J. Cell Biol.17 (1963) 208.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vardell, I. M., Tapia, F. J., Probert, L., Buchan, A. M. J., Gu, J., DeMey, J., Bloom, S. R., and Polak, J. M., in: Techniques in Immunocytochemistry, vol. 3, pp. 16–154. Eds G. R. Bullock and P. Petrusz. Academic Press, London 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bonaventura, C., Bonaventura, J., Miller, K. I., and Van Holde, K. E., Arch Biochem. Biophys.211 (1981) 589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schipp, R., and Hevert, F., Marine Biology47 (1978) 391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruth, P., Blum, W., and Bille, J., Verh. dtsch. Zool. Ges.85, 1 (1992) 278.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schipp, R., and Pfeiffer, K., Zool. Jb. Anat.104 (1980) 317.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Henning, W., Phylogenetic Systematics, Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nielsen, C., in: Animal Evolution, Interrelationships of the Living Phyla, pp. 110–123. Ed C. Nielsen. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, Tokyo 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruth, P., Blum, W. & Bille, J. Immunocytochemical reaction of a haemocyanin antibody in the midgut gland ofNautilus (Cephalopoda, Tetrabranchiata). Experientia 52, 549–553 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01969726

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01969726

Key words

Navigation