Skip to main content
Log in

Foraging behaviour of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) on transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.var. oleifera)

  • Papers
  • Published:
Transgenic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of genetically modified oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) on the foraging behaviour of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) was evaluated on two different lines transformed to express constitutively heterologous chitinase in somatic tissue for enhanced disease resistance. Experiments were conducted in confinement in an indoor flight room with controlled conditions and in an outdoor flight cage with conditions more representative of the open environment. Foraging behaviour was analysed by observations of general bee behaviour (total number of visits) and of individual bee behaviour (using a video camera coupled with a special software program to process the data). The plants were analysed in terms of nectar quantity and quality (nectar volume and sugar content). The results showed no effects on bee foraging behaviour due to the modification of the genome of these plants by the introduction of a chitinase gene even though some differences between lines were found in the nectar. The methods applied in this original approach for the evaluation of the impact of genetically modified oilseed rape were shown to be sufficiently sensitive to detect changes in bee behaviour resulting from differences between plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, H.G. and Baker, I. (1983) A brief historical review of the chemistry of floral nectar. In Bentley, B. and Elias, T. ed. The Biology of Nectaries. pp. 126–53. Colombia University Press.

  • Black, L.T. and Bagley, E.B. (1978) Determination of oligosaccharides in soybeans by high pressure liquid chromatography using an internal standard.J. Am. Oil Chemists' Soc. 55, 228–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broglie, K.E., Gaynor, J.J. and Broglie, R.M. (1986) Ethylene-regulated gene expression: molecular cloning of the genes encoding an endochitinase fromPhaseolus vulgaris.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 6820–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, P.J., Irwin, J.A. and Scheffler, J.A. (1993) The experimental and commercial release of transgenic crop plants.Plant Breeding 111, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerche, P., Jouanin, L., Tepfer, D. and Pelletier, G. (1987) Genetic transformation of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) by the Ri T-DNA ofAgrobacterium rhizogenes and analysis of inheritance of the transformed phenotype.Mol. Gen. Genet. 206, 382–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B. (1975) Energetics of pollination.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6, 139–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, K. and Koja, D. (1986) Insect chitin: Physical state, synthesis, degradation and metabolic regulation.Insect Biochem. 16, 851–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krell, R. and Dietz, A. (1986) Foraging behaviour ofApis mellifera ligustica on Gallberry (Ilex glabra). Proceedings of the XXXth International Congress of Apiculture, Nagoya, 109–113.

  • Mesquida, J. and Renard, M. (1981) Pollinisation du colza d'hiver mâle-stérile et mâle-fertile (Brassica napus L. var.oleifera Metzger) par I'abeille domestique (Apis mellifera L.). Effets sur la phénologie et le rendement.Apidologie 12, 345–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesquida, J., Pham-Delègue, M.H., Marilleau, R., Metayer, M. le and Renard, M. (1991) La sécrétion nectarifère des fleurs de cybrides mâle-stérile de colza d'hiver (Brassica napus L.).Agronomie 11, 217–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molano, J., Duran, A. and Cabib, E. (1977) A rapid and sensitive assay for chitinase using tritiated chitin.Anal. Biochem. 83, 648–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Odell, J.T., Nagy, F. and Chua, N.H. (1985) Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter.Nature 313, 810–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renard, M. and Mesquida, J. (1978) Importance relative des sécrétions nectarifères sur le comportement de butinage des abeilles et la pollinisation du colza mâle-stérile en production de semences.Bull. Tech. Apic. 147, 93–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel, P. (1987) Efficient nectar-collecting by honeybees. I Economic model.J. Anim. Ecol. 56, 209–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel, P. and Schmid-Hempel, R. (1987) Efficient nectar-collecting by honeybees. II Response to factors determining nectar availability.J. Anim. Ecol. 56, 219–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skujins, J.J., Potgierger, H.J. and Alexander, M. (1965) Dissolution of fungal cell walls by a streptomycete chitinase and β-1,3 glucanase.Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 111, 358–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Towbin, H., Staehelin, T. and Gordon, J. (1979) Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets procedure and some applications.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 4350–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, K.D. (1980) Flight patterns of foraging honey bees relative to density of artificial flowers and distribution of nectar.Oecologia 44, 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, A.W. (1968) Some factors affecting selection of sucrose by foraging honeybees.Am. Bee J. 108, 313–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wykes, G.R. (1953) The sugar content of nectars.Biochem. J. 53, 294–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. (1983) Plant reproduction and optimal foraging: experimental manipulations inDelphinium nelsonii.Oikos 41, 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Picard-Nizou, A.L., Pham-Delègue, M.H., Kerguelen, V. et al. Foraging behaviour of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) on transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.var. oleifera). Transgenic Research 4, 270–276 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01969121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01969121

Keywords

Navigation