Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of five commercial systems for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci to species level

  • Notes
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Five commercially available systems for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci to the species level were evaluated using 163 clinical staphylococcal isolates. The conventional method of Kloos and Schleifer served as reference method. The API 20GP system showed the highest rate of agreement with the reference method, correctly identifying 98.8% of the isolates. The Microscan system had an overall rate of agreement of 96.3 %, and Staph-Trac, Sceptor and Staph-Ident rates of 88.8 %, 87.6 % and 84. % respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Archer, G. L. Staphylococcus epidermidis: the organism, its diseases, and treatment. In: Remington, J. S., Swartz, M. N. (ed.): Current clinical topics in infectious diseases, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984, p. 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kloos, W. E., Schleifer, K. H. Simplified scheme for routine identification of humanStaphylococcus species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1975, 1: 82–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hussain, Z., Stoakes, L., Stevens, D. L., Schieven, B. C., Lannigan, R., Jones, C. Comparison of the Microscan system with the API Staph-Ident system for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986, 23: 126–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Almeida, R. J., Jorgensen, J. H. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci with the API Staph-Ident System. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 18: 254–257.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baddour, L. M., Smalley, D. L., Kraus, A. P., Lamoreaux, W. J., Christensen, G. D. Comparison of microbiologic characteristics of pathogenic and saprophytic coagulase-negative staphylococci from patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 1986, 5: 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gemell, C. G., Dawson, J. E. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci with the API Staph Ident system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1982, 16: 874–877.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aldridge, K. E., Stratton, C. W., Patterson, L. S., Evans, M. E., Hodges, R. L. Comparison of the Staph-Ident system with a conventional method for species identification of urine and blood isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 17: 516–520.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crouch, S. F., Pearson, T. A., Parham, D. M. Comparison of modified Minitek system with Staph-Ident system for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1987, 25: 1626–1628.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Doern, G. V., Earls, J. E., Jeznach, P. A., Parker, D. S. Species identification and biotyping of staphylococci by the API Staph-Ident System. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 17: 260–263.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grasmick, A. E., Naito, N., Bruckner, D. A. Clinical comparison of the automicrobic system gram-positive identification of coagulase-negativeStaphylococcus spp. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 18: 1323–1328.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skulnick, M., Patel, M.P. & Low, D.E. Evaluation of five commercial systems for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci to species level. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 8, 1001–1003 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01967575

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01967575

Keywords

Navigation