Skip to main content
Log in

Conflict and compatibility of wealth and welfare maximization

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Recently it has been shown that a corporation maximizing the market value of its shares does not necessarily maximize the welfare of its shareholders. It is assumed that the shareholders have either quadratic or exponential utility functions and identical future expectations. This paper drops these assumptions and analyzes in general the conditions under which market value resp. wealth maximization is compatible with welfare maximization. It will be shown that conflict and compatibility of these objectives depend on the degree of relative risk aversion of the shareholders.

Zusammenfassung

Kürzlich wurde gezeigt, daß ein Unternehmen, das den Marktwert seiner Aktien maximiert, nicht unbedingt die Wohlfahrt seiner Aktionäre maximiert. Dabei wurde unterstellt, die Aktionäre hätten entweder quadratische oder exponentielle Nutzenfunktionen und gleiche Zukunftserwartungen. Hier werden unter Aufgabe dieser Annahmen die Bedingungen analysiert, unter denen Marktwert bzw. Reichtumsmaximierung mit Wohlfahrtsmaximierung kompatibel ist. Es wird gezeigt, daß Konflikt und Kompatibilität dieser Ziele von der Höhe der relativen Risikoaversion der Aktionäre abhängen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, M.: On the Risk-Return Trade-Off in the Valuation of Assets, in: Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,4, 493–512, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J.: Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing, Helsinki (Finnland), 1965.

  • Ebel, J.: Optimality of Stock Market Allocation: Notes of Discussion. Discussion paper, Saarbrücken, 1973.

  • Franke, G.: Verschuldungs- und Ausschüttungspolitik im Licht der Portefeuilletheorie, Köln et al. 1971.

  • Hirshleifer, J.: Investment, Interest and Capital, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1970.

  • Laux, H.: Kapitalkosten und Ertragsteuern, Köln et al. 1969.

  • —: Expected Utility Maximization and Capital Budgeting Subgoals, in: Unternehmensforschung15, 130–146, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintner, J.: Security Prices, Risk and Maximal Gains from Diversification, in: Journal of Finance20, 587–615, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.: Wealth, Welfare, and the Price of Risk, in: Journal of Finance27, 419–433, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossin, J.: Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market, in: Econometrica,34, 768–783, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Optimal Multiperiod Portfolio Policies, in: Journal of Business41, 215–229, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J.: Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large, in: Econometrica,32, 122–136, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., andJ. E. Stiglitz: Increasing Risk: I. A Definition, in: Journal of Economic Theory2, 225–243, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W.: Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk, in: Journal of Finance19, 425–442, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E.: Optimality of Stock Market Allocation, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics86, 25–60, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, G. A.: Market Demand Curve for Common Stock and the Maximization of Market Value, in: Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis5, 105–114, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franke, G. Conflict and compatibility of wealth and welfare maximization. Zeitschrift für Operations Research 19, 1–13 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01958595

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01958595

Keywords

Navigation