Abstract
We report a prospective, non-blind, randomised, multicentre, parallel group, multinational investigation to compare ceftazidime to aminoglycoside based regimens as empirical treatment in 1316 cases of suspected sepsis in the newborn. In each of the 15 study centres either ceftazidime alone (CAZ) or ceftazidime + ampicillin (CAZ+AMP) was compared to an aminoglyocoside/ampicillin combination (AG+AMP). In all cases treatment was based on “an intention to treat”. Bacteria considered to be pathogenic were isolated from 176/1316 (13.4%) patients. The incidence of proven infection varied from 39% in a Yugoslav centre to 6% in a British centre; a further 489/1316 (37.1%) patients fulfilled the criteria for clinically suspected sepsis. A total of 210 bacterial isolates from 197 infection sites in 176 patients were considered to be clinically significant. The cure rate for evaluable patients with proven infection who were treated with CAZ+AMP (97%, 30/31) was significantly higher than that for the corresponding patients treated with AG+AMP (66%, 26/39), (P<0.002). The difference in cure rate between CAZ monotherapy (79%, 34/43) and AG+AMP (86%, 32/37) was not significant. Treatment failed in 28/150 (18.7%) evaluable patients. There were significantly fewer failures (P<0.001) with CAZ+AMP than with AG+AMP therapy. There were 55 staphylococcal infections. Treatment was successful in 16/19 evaluable patients treated with CAZ or CAZ+AMP and in 16/29 evaluable patients treated with AG+AMP. None of the study centres encountered problems with ceftazidime resistant bacteria. The cure rate for patients with only clinical and radiological evidence of sepsis was greater than 94% in all treatment groups. Of the study population 65 (4.9%) died, 15 deaths were attributed to infection, pathogenic bacteria were only isolated from 10. The mortality rate for infected babies was 5.7% compared to 4.8% for those without confirmed infection. All the deaths associated with infection were due to Gram-positive bacteria. This study suggests that the practice of continuing antibiotic therapy once pretreatment cultures are known to be negative should be seriously reconsidered. It is concluded that CAZ+AMP is superior to either AG+AMP or ceftazidime monotherapy for the treatment of infection in the newborn. Further studies are required to confirm these observations in neonates with proven infection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AG:
-
aminoglycoside
- AMP:
-
ampicillin
- CAZ:
-
Ceftazidime
References
Adelman RD, Wirth F, Rubio T (1987) A controlled study of nephrotoxicity of mezlocillin and amikacin in the neonate. Am J Dis Child 141:1175–1178
Harris AM, Harper PB, Plested SJ, Beniacova E (1982) Ceftazidime: in vitro activity against isolates resistant to aminogly-coside or β-lactam antibiotics and activity in combination with antibiotics in clinical use. Curr Chemother Immunother 1: 478–480
Heusser MF, Patterson JE, Kuritza AP, Edberg SC, Baltimore RS (1990) Emergence of resistance to multiple beta-lactam in Enterobacter cloacae during treatment for neonatal meningitis with cefotaxime. Pediatr Infect Dis 9:509–512
Itsarayoungyuen S, Riff L, Schauf V, Hamilton J, Otremblak J, Vidyasagar D (1982) Tobramycin and gentamicin are equally safe for neonates: results of a double-blind randomized trail with quantitative assessment of renal function. Pediatr Pharmacol 2:143–155
Lewis DA, Hawkey PM, Matts JA, Spieler DCS, Primavesi RJ, Fleming PJ, Pitt TL (1983) Infection with netilmicin resistant. Serratia marcesens in a special care baby unit. BMJ 287: 1701–1705
Louvois J de, Mulhall A (1985) Ceftazidime in neonatal infection. Arch Dis Child 60:891–892
Louvois J de, Blackbourn J, Hurley R, Harvey D (1991) Infantile meningitis in England and Wales: a two year study. Arch Dis Child 66:603–607
Low DC, Bissenden JG, Wise R (1985) Ceftazidime in neonatal infections. Arch Dis Child 60:360–364
McCracken GH Jr (1972) The rate of bacteriologic response to antimicrobial therapy in neonatal meningitis. Am J Dis Child 123:533–547
Modi N, Damjanovic V, Cooke RWI (1987) Outbreak of cephalosporin resistant Enterobacter cloacae infection in a neonatal intensive care unit. Arch Dis Child 62:148–151
Mulhall A, Louvois J de (1985) Two years experience with ceftazidime in neonatal practice. Insights into the Treatment of Serious Infections 1:167–173
Mulhall A, Louvois J de, Hurley R (1983) Incidence of potentially toxic concentrations of gentamicin in the neonate. Arch Dis Child 58:897–900
Norrby RS (1985) Role of cephalosporin in the treatment of bacterial meningitis in adults. Overview with special emphasis on ceftazidime. Am J Med 79 [Suppl 2A]:56–61
Odio CA, Uman MA, Saenz A, Salas JL, McCracken GH Jr (1987) Comparative efficacy of ceftazidime vs. carbenicillin and amikacin for treatment of neonatal septicaemia. Pediatr Infect Dis 6:371–377
Padovani EM, Fanos V, Boner A, Chiaffoni GP, Soncini R, Fostini R (1985) clinical efficacy and tolerance of ceftazidime as sole antibiotic in neonatal bacterial infections. Clin Trials J 22:224–230
Pollock I, Mulhall A, Louvois J de (1985) Ceftazidime in the treatment of neonatal infections. J Hosp Infect 6:158–165
Snelling S, Hart CA, Cooke RWI (1983) Ceftazidime or gentamicin plus benzyl penicillin in neonates less than forty eight hours old. Antimicrob Chemother 12 [Suppl A]:353–356
Tessin I, Thiringer K, Trollfors B, Brorson JE (1988) comparison of serum concentrations of ceftazidime and tobramycin in newborn infants. Eur J Pediatr 147:405–407
Tessin I, Trollfors B, Thiringer K, Bergmark J, Hultberg B (1988) Enzymuria in neonates during treatment with tobramycin or ceftazidime. Pediatr Infect Dis 7:142–143
Tessin I, Trollfors B, Thiringer K, Thorn Z, Larsson P (1989) Concentrations of ceftazidime, tobramycin and ampicillin in the cerebrospinal fluid of newborn infants. Eur J Pediatr 148: 679–681
Young LS, Hindler J (1986) Aminoglycoside resistance: a worldwide perspective. Am J Med 80 [Suppl B]:15–21
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Additional information
The ESPID Neonatal Sepsis Study Group: Recruitment >=50 patients included Prof. R. Dagan, Soroka Medical Centre, Beer-Sheva, Israel; Dr. I. Tessin, Hospital of Molndal, Molndal, Sweden; Dr. D. Harvey and Dr. J. de Louvois, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK; Dr. B. Trollfors and Dr. K. Thiringer, Ostra Sjukuset, Goteborg, Sweden; Dr. A. Valido, Maternidade, Dr. Alfredo Costa, Lisbon, Portugal; Dr. H. Baumer, Freedom Fields Hospital, Plymouth, UK: Prof. J. Brines and Dr. Diez, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Dr. L. Benic, Dr. J. Kajfes Hospital, Zagreb, Yugoslavia; and Prof. J. Badoual, Hopital St. Vincent de Paul, Paris, France.
Recruitment <50 patients included Prof. L. Corbeel, UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Prof. R. Roos, Univ.-Kinderklinik, Munich, FRG; Dr. D. Kafetzisa, University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Dr. S. Pedersen, Kolding Sykehus, Kolding, Denmark; and Prof. A. Columbo, Ospedali Riunuti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Louvois, J., Dagan, R., Tessin, I. et al. A comparison of ceftazidime and aminoglycoside based regimens as empirical treatment in 1316 cases of suspected sepsis in the newborn. Eur J Pediatr 151, 876–884 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01954122
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01954122