Skip to main content
Log in

The insect antenna is not a molecular sieve

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The deposition rate of 2 tritiated odorants onto insect antennae of different sizes and shapes is linearly proportional to the product of odorant concentration times the antennal surface area. This result challenges an assumption in a commonly accepted hypothesis that sensillar shape affects odorant deposition and that a single odorant molecule can initiate an action potential in a receptor cell. Consequently the 1-molecule-1-spike hypothesis bears reinvestigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Kaissling, K.-E., in: Handbook of Sensory Physiology IV/1, p. 351. Ed. L. M. Beidler, Springer, Berlin 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Steinbrecht, R. A., and Kasang, G., in: Olfaction and Taste IV, p. 193–199. Ed. D. Schneider. Wissenschafltiche Verlags. MBH, Stuttgart 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kasang, G., Naturwissenschaften60 (1973) 95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adam, G., and Delbrück, M., in: Structural Chemistry and Molecular Biology, p. 198. Eds A. Rich and N. Davidson. Freeman, San Francisco 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Murray, J. D., Lectures on Nonlinear-Differential-Equation Models in Biology, p. 83. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mankin, R. W., Vick, K. W., Mayer, M. S., Coffelt, J. A., and Callahan, P. S., J. chem. Ecol.6 (1980) 929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alcock, J., Animal Behavior, p. 131. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schneider, D., Kafka, W. A., Beroza, M., and Bierl, B. A., J. comp. Physiol.113 (1977) 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matthews, R. W., and Matthews, J. R., Insect Behavior, p. 181. J. Wiley and Sons, New York 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  10. O'Connell, R. J., Grant, A. J., Mayer, M. S., and Mankin, R. W., Science220 (1983) 1408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McMahon, T. A., and Denison, P. J., Atmosph. Envir.13 (1979), 571.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jenson, N. O., Hlth Phys.40 (1981) 887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sehmel, G. A., Atmosph. Envir.,14 (1980) 983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van Drongelen, W., Pagnatte, I., and Hendricks, M. A., Bull. math. Biol.44 (1982) 411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mankin, R. W., and Mayer, M. S., J. theor. Biol.100 (1983) 123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mayer, M. S., and Mankin, R. W., in: Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology, (in press). Eds G. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert, Pergamon, Oxford 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mention of a commercial or proprietary product does not constitute an endorsement by the USDA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mankin, R.W., Mayer, M.S. The insect antenna is not a molecular sieve. Experientia 40, 1251–1252 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01946658

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01946658

Key words

Navigation