Skip to main content
Log in

Hierarchies of cities and the spatial filtering of industrial development

  • Twenty-Ninth North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association
  • Published:
Papers of the Regional Science Association

Abstract

The spatial division of labor and external economies associated with the nation's hierarchical system of cities are postulated to be part of the process involved in the spatial filtering of industrial development. In this process high labor costs in metropolitan areas cause less competitive industries to restructure their operations or be priced out of the larger labor markets. The industries priced out of the markets locate all or some of their operations in smaller settlements in more distant areas where labor costs are lower, given sufficient external economies. The research supports this general proposition but reveals differences based upon the types of industries and the location of their headquarter facilities. It also reveals significant differences in the locational patterns and site selection criteria of different types of plants established by local, national and foreign firms; these differences foster the development of spatially bifurcated or dual labor markets that are associated with regional city size distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clark, G. 1981. The employment relation and spatial division of labor: a hypothesis.Annals, Association of American Geographers 71: 412–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromley, G. and Leinbach, T. R. 1981. The pattern and impact of the filter-down process in nonmetropolitan Kentucky.Economic Geography 57: 208–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Development Division. 1975.North Carolina directory of manufacturing firms. Raleigh, N.C.: North Carolina Department of Natural and Economic Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R. A. 1976a. The filtering-down process: industrial location in a nonmetropolitan area.Professional Geographer 28: 254–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R. A. 1976b. Nonmetropolitan industrial expansion: emerging implications for regional development.Review of Regional Studies 6: 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R. A. and Leinbach, T. R. 1979. Characteristics of branch plants attracted to nonmetropolitan areas. InNonmetropolitan Industrialization, eds. R. E. Lonsdale and H. L. Seyler, pp. 57–78. Washington, D.C.: V. H. Winston and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R. A. and Wasylenko, M. 1980. Firm relocation and site selection in suburban municipalities.Journal of Urban Economics 8: 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, H. J. and Wettman, R. W. 1980. Innovation-oriented regional policy.Regional Studies 14: 161–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, V. R. 1967. Hourly earnings differentials by region and size of city.Monthly Labor Review 90: 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, R. S. and Yezer, A. M. J. 1976. Evaluating alternative theories of intercity and interregional wage differentials.Journal of Regional Science 16: 345–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, M. E. 1970. A note on urban and nonurban employment growth in the South, 1940–1960.Journal of Regional Science 10: 397–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, N. H. 1979. The new international division of labor and manufacturing decentralization in the United States.Review of Regional Studies 9: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, I. 1972. Income and city size.Urban Studies 9: 299–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, R. R. 1972. Some rural economic development problems in the South.American Economic Review 62: 209–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. and Meegan, R. A. 1978. The geography of industrial reorganization: the spatial effects of the restructuring of the electrical engineering sector under the I.R.C.Progress in Planning 10: 155–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensch, G. 1979.Stalemate in technology, Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, B. M. 1975. Population and employment shifts within regional hierarchies of cities.Proceedings of the Association of American Geographers 7: 155–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, B. M. 1976. The distributed lag between metropolitan area employment and population growth.Journal of Regional Science 16: 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, B. M. 1978. A note on unexplained residuals in North-South wage differential models.Journal of Regional Science 18: 105–08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, B. M. 1980.Industrial location and community development, Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, B. M. 1981. Spread and diffusion processes in regional industrial employment growth. InRegional development under stagnation, eds. W. Buhr and P. Friedrich, pp. 149–77. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. 1976.Science indicators 1975. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. 1981.Science indicators 1980. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, R. D. and Rees, J. 1979. The product cycle and the spatial decentralization of American manufacturing.Regional Studies 13: 141–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell, P. N. and Crouchley, R. 1979. The locational pattern of new manufacturing establishments: an application of discriminant analysis.Regional Studies 13: 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. O. and Wheeler, J. O. 1983. The filtering down process in Georgia: the third stage of the product life cycle.The Professional Geographer 35: 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. R. 1977.City-systems in advanced economics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, J. 1979. Technological change and regional shifts in American manufacturing.Professional Geographer 31: 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmenner, R. W. 1982.Making business location decisions. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struyk, R. J. and James, F. J., Jr. 1975.Intrametropolitan industrial location. Lexington: D. C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Till, T. 1973. The extent of industrialization in southern nonmetro labor markets in the 1960s.Journal of Regional Science 13: 453–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. R. 1969. The economic base of urban problems. InContemporary economic issues, ed. N. W. Chamberlin, pp. 1–47. Homewood Hills, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. R. and Mattilla, J. M. 1959.An econometric model of postwar state industrial development. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle.Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 190–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheat, L. J. 1973.Regional growth and industrial location: an empirical viewpoint. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelinsky, W. 1962. Has American industry been decentralizing: the evidence for the 1930–1954 period.Economic Geography 38: 251–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moriarty, B.M. Hierarchies of cities and the spatial filtering of industrial development. Papers of the Regional Science Association 53, 59–82 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01939919

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01939919

Keywords

Navigation