Abstract
The spatial division of labor and external economies associated with the nation's hierarchical system of cities are postulated to be part of the process involved in the spatial filtering of industrial development. In this process high labor costs in metropolitan areas cause less competitive industries to restructure their operations or be priced out of the larger labor markets. The industries priced out of the markets locate all or some of their operations in smaller settlements in more distant areas where labor costs are lower, given sufficient external economies. The research supports this general proposition but reveals differences based upon the types of industries and the location of their headquarter facilities. It also reveals significant differences in the locational patterns and site selection criteria of different types of plants established by local, national and foreign firms; these differences foster the development of spatially bifurcated or dual labor markets that are associated with regional city size distributions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clark, G. 1981. The employment relation and spatial division of labor: a hypothesis.Annals, Association of American Geographers 71: 412–24.
Cromley, G. and Leinbach, T. R. 1981. The pattern and impact of the filter-down process in nonmetropolitan Kentucky.Economic Geography 57: 208–24.
Economic Development Division. 1975.North Carolina directory of manufacturing firms. Raleigh, N.C.: North Carolina Department of Natural and Economic Resources.
Erickson, R. A. 1976a. The filtering-down process: industrial location in a nonmetropolitan area.Professional Geographer 28: 254–60.
Erickson, R. A. 1976b. Nonmetropolitan industrial expansion: emerging implications for regional development.Review of Regional Studies 6: 35–48.
Erickson, R. A. and Leinbach, T. R. 1979. Characteristics of branch plants attracted to nonmetropolitan areas. InNonmetropolitan Industrialization, eds. R. E. Lonsdale and H. L. Seyler, pp. 57–78. Washington, D.C.: V. H. Winston and Sons.
Erickson, R. A. and Wasylenko, M. 1980. Firm relocation and site selection in suburban municipalities.Journal of Urban Economics 8: 69–85.
Evers, H. J. and Wettman, R. W. 1980. Innovation-oriented regional policy.Regional Studies 14: 161–79.
Fuchs, V. R. 1967. Hourly earnings differentials by region and size of city.Monthly Labor Review 90: 22–26.
Goldfarb, R. S. and Yezer, A. M. J. 1976. Evaluating alternative theories of intercity and interregional wage differentials.Journal of Regional Science 16: 345–63.
Goodstein, M. E. 1970. A note on urban and nonurban employment growth in the South, 1940–1960.Journal of Regional Science 10: 397–401.
Hansen, N. H. 1979. The new international division of labor and manufacturing decentralization in the United States.Review of Regional Studies 9: 1–11.
Hoch, I. 1972. Income and city size.Urban Studies 9: 299–328.
Marshall, R. R. 1972. Some rural economic development problems in the South.American Economic Review 62: 209–14.
Massey, D. and Meegan, R. A. 1978. The geography of industrial reorganization: the spatial effects of the restructuring of the electrical engineering sector under the I.R.C.Progress in Planning 10: 155–237.
Mensch, G. 1979.Stalemate in technology, Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
Moriarty, B. M. 1975. Population and employment shifts within regional hierarchies of cities.Proceedings of the Association of American Geographers 7: 155–59.
Moriarty, B. M. 1976. The distributed lag between metropolitan area employment and population growth.Journal of Regional Science 16: 195–212.
Moriarty, B. M. 1978. A note on unexplained residuals in North-South wage differential models.Journal of Regional Science 18: 105–08.
Moriarty, B. M. 1980.Industrial location and community development, Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press.
Moriarty, B. M. 1981. Spread and diffusion processes in regional industrial employment growth. InRegional development under stagnation, eds. W. Buhr and P. Friedrich, pp. 149–77. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag.
National Science Foundation. 1976.Science indicators 1975. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Science Foundation. 1981.Science indicators 1980. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Norton, R. D. and Rees, J. 1979. The product cycle and the spatial decentralization of American manufacturing.Regional Studies 13: 141–51.
O'Farrell, P. N. and Crouchley, R. 1979. The locational pattern of new manufacturing establishments: an application of discriminant analysis.Regional Studies 13: 39–60.
Park, S. O. and Wheeler, J. O. 1983. The filtering down process in Georgia: the third stage of the product life cycle.The Professional Geographer 35: 18–31.
Pred, A. R. 1977.City-systems in advanced economics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Rees, J. 1979. Technological change and regional shifts in American manufacturing.Professional Geographer 31: 45–54.
Schmenner, R. W. 1982.Making business location decisions. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Struyk, R. J. and James, F. J., Jr. 1975.Intrametropolitan industrial location. Lexington: D. C. Heath and Company.
Till, T. 1973. The extent of industrialization in southern nonmetro labor markets in the 1960s.Journal of Regional Science 13: 453–61.
Thompson, W. R. 1969. The economic base of urban problems. InContemporary economic issues, ed. N. W. Chamberlin, pp. 1–47. Homewood Hills, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin Inc.
Thompson, W. R. and Mattilla, J. M. 1959.An econometric model of postwar state industrial development. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle.Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 190–207.
Wheat, L. J. 1973.Regional growth and industrial location: an empirical viewpoint. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
Zelinsky, W. 1962. Has American industry been decentralizing: the evidence for the 1930–1954 period.Economic Geography 38: 251–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moriarty, B.M. Hierarchies of cities and the spatial filtering of industrial development. Papers of the Regional Science Association 53, 59–82 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01939919
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01939919