Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regional impact of interregional trade in input-output analysis

  • Forecasting Models
  • Published:
Papers of the Regional Science Association

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bourque, Philip J. and Gerald Hansen.An Inventory of Regional Input-Output Studies in The United States. Seattle: University of Washington, Graduate School of Business Administration, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chenery, Hollis and Paul G. Clark.Interindustry Economics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Czamanski, Stanislaw. “Applicability and Limitations in the Uses of National Input-Output Tables for Regional Studies,”Papers of the Regional Science Association, XXI, 1968.

  4. Goodwin, R. M. “The Multiplier as Matrix,”The Economic Journal, LIX, December, 1949.

  5. Hansen, W. L. and C. M. Tiebout, “An Intersectorial Flows Analysis of the California Economy,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, XLV, No. 4, November, 1963, pp. 409–418.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hirsch, Werner Z. “Interindustry Relations of a Metropolitan Area,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXI, November, 1959.

  7. Interstate Commerce Commission, Bureau of Economics.Carload Waybill Statistics, 1963, Statements 552, 553, and 555, Washington, D.C., 1966.

  8. Isard, Walter,Methods of Regional Analysis. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Isard, Walter. “Interregional and Regional Input-Output Analysis: Model of A Space Economy,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXV, November, 1953.

  10. —. “Regional Commodity Balances and Interregional Commodity Flows,”American Economic Review, XLIII, May,1953, pp. 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Isard, Walter and Robert E. Kuenne. “The Impact of Steel Upon the Greater New York-Philadelphia Industrial Region: A Study in Agglomeration Projection,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXV, November, 1953, pp. 289–301.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lane, Theodore. “The Urban Base Multiplier: An Evaluation of the State of the Art,”Land Economics, August, 1966, pp. 339–347.

  13. Leven, Charles L., ed.Developmental Benefits of Water Resource Investments. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Water Resources, Office of the Chief of Engineers, Corps of Army Engineers, December, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leven, Charles L., “Regional and Interregional Accounts In Perspective,”Papers of the Regional Science Association, XIII, 1964.

  15. -Leven, Charles L.. “Regional Income and Product Accounts: Construction and Application” in Werner Hochwald, ed.,Design of Regional Accounts, Committee on Regional Accounts, Resources for the Future, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 148–195.

  16. Leven, Charles L.Theory and Method of Income and Product Accounts for Metropolitan Areas Including the Elgin-Dundee Area as a Case Study, Pittsburgh, mimeograph.

  17. Miernyk, William H.Elements of Input-Output Analysis. New York: Random House, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, Ronald E. “Interregional Feedback Effects in Input-Output Models: Some Preliminary Results,”Papers of the Regional Science Association, XVII, 1966, pp. 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  19. —. “Further Results on Interregional Feedback Effects in Input-Output Models”,Western Economic Journal, VII, No. 1, March, 1969, pp. 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moses, Leon N. “Interregional Analysis.” Report on Research for 1954, Cambridge: Harvard Economic Research Project, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  21. —. “The Stability of Interregional Trading Patterns and Input-Output Analysis,”American Economic Review, XLV, No. 5, December, 1955, pp. 803–832.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sandoval, A. David. “Constant Relationships between Input-Output Income Multipliers,”Review of Economics and Statistics, XLII, No. 4, November, 1967, pp. 599–600.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thiel, Henri.Applied Economic Forecasting. New York: Rand, McNally & Company,Studies in Mathematical Managerial Economics Series, IV, chap. 2, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tiebout, Charles M. “Regional and Interregional Input-Output Models: An Appraisal,”Southern Economic Journal, XXIV, October, 1957.

  25. United States Bureau of the Census.Census of Commerical Fisheries, 1963, Series FC 63-1, Washington, D.C., 1966.

  26. United States Bureau of the Census.Census of Mineral Industries, 1963, I, “General Summary and Industry Statistics, II, “Area Statistics,” Washington, D.C., 1967.

  27. United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines.Minerals Year Book, 1963, II, “Fuels,” III, “Area Statistics,” Washington, D.C., 1964.

  28. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Farm Income Situation, Series FIS, No. 203, and supplement, “Farm Income, State Estimates, 1949–1965,” Washington, D.C., August, 1966.

  29. United States Department of Commerce, Office of Business Economics.Survey of Current Business, XLV, September, 1965, Washington, D.C.

  30. Wang, Kung Lee. “Regional Economic Research Program of the Division of Economic Analysis, U. S. Bureau of Mines,” Paper given at the Western Regional Science Association, Las Vegas, Nevada, January, 1967.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Syracuse University, USA

    David Greytak

Authors
  1. David Greytak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Research reported here was completed by the author on a grant from Resources for the Future for a postdoctoral fellowship in the Institute for Applied Urban Economics, Indiana University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greytak, D. Regional impact of interregional trade in input-output analysis. Papers of the Regional Science Association 25, 203–217 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01935825

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01935825

Keywords

Search

Navigation