Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodological aspects of impact analysis of regional economic policy

  • Published:
Papers of the Regional Science Association

Abstract

In this paper methodological aspects of impact analysis of regional economic policy are discussed. The first part of the paper deals primarily with conceptual notions and considers impact analysis as part of the comprehensive process of policy evaluation. Given this frame of reference, a detailed conceptual framework for impact analysis is outlined. In the second part of this paper measurement methods are classified into micro and macro studies. The latter class is then further subdivided according to the structure and contents of the impact model at hand. The advantages and weaknesses of each method are evaluated. Finally, an overview of the choice of an appropriate measurement method, given the circumstances under which a specific type of effect of a given kind of instrument has to be measured, is given. This is followed by some general conclusions on impact assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartels, C. P. A., Nicol, W. R., and Van Duyn, J. J. 1982. Estimating the impact of regional policy: a review of applied research methods.Regional Science and Urban Economics 12, 1: 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basman, R. L. 1963. The causal interpretaion of non-triangular systems of economic relations.Econometrica 31: 439–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentzel, R. and Hansen, B. 1955. On recursiveness and interdependency in economic models.The Review of Economic Studies XXII: 153–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berentsen, W. H. 1978. Austrian regional development policy: the impact of policy on the achievement of planning goals.Economic Geography 54: 115–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, M. M., Jr. 1971. Theory building and causal influences. InMethodology in social research, eds. M. M. Blalock, Jr. and A. B. Blalock, pp. 151–72. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. 1980. Multiregional models in policy analysis. InModeling the multiregional economic system, eds. F. G. Adams and N. J. Glickman, pp. 255–84. Lexington: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. and Jenkins, G. M. 1976.Time series analysis. San Francisco: Holden Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, F. and Nijkamp, P. 1985. Qualitative structure analysis of complex systems. InMeasuring the unmeasurable, eds. P. Nijkamp, H. Leitner and N. Wrigley, pp. 509–32. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. J. 1972.The framework of regional economic policy in the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, T. W. and Atkins, M. H. 1976. The impact of British regional policies on employment growth.Oxford Economic Papers 28: 118–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T. D. and Stanley, J. C. 1966.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannel, C. F. and Khan, R. L. 1968. Interviewing. InThe handbook of social psychology II, eds. G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, pp. 229–46. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, R. 1982. Parameter instability in models of local unemployment responses.Environment and Planning A 14: 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, H., 1953. Notes on causality. InReadings in the philosophy of science, eds. H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck, pp. 73–90. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F. M. 1969. Causation and specification in economic theory and econometrics.Synthese 20: 148–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folmer, H. 1980. Measurement of the effects of regional policy instruments.Environment and Planning A 12: 1191–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folmer H. 1981. Measurement of the effects of regional policy instruments by means of linear structural equation models and panel data.Environment and Planning A 13: 1435–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folmer, H. 1985.Regional economic policy: measurement of its effects. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folmer, H. and Oosterhaven, J. 1983. Measurement of employment effects of Dutch regional socioeconomic policy. InDilemmas in regional policy, eds. A. Kuklinski and J. G. Lambooy, pp. 227–44. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, N. J. 1980.The urban impacts of federal policies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haavelmo, T. 1944 The probability approach in econometrics.Econometrica 12, Supplement: 530–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafkamp, W. A. 1984.Economic-environmental modeling in a national-regional system. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A. C. 1981.The econometric analysis of time series. Oxford: Philip Allan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepple, L. 1979. Regional dynamics in British unemployment, and the impact of structural change. InStatistical applications in the spatial sciences, ed. N. Wrigley, pp. 45–63. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issaev, B., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P., and Snickars, F., eds. 1982.Multiregional economic modeling: practice and prospect. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. and Mann, L. 1977.Decision making. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, P. G. W. and Scott Morton, M. S. 1978.Decision support systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E., eds., 1968.The handbook of social psychology 2 (2nd edition). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. 1971. The use of variance component models in pooling cross section and time series data.Econometrica 39: 341–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybee, J. S. and Voogd, H. 1984. Qualitative impact analysis through qualitative calculus: a review.Environment & Planning B 11: 365–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. and Rhodes, J. 1974. The effects of regional economic policy in the United Kingdom. InRegional policy and planning for Europe, ed. M. Sant pp. 41–62. Farnborough: Saxon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. and Rhodes, J. 1976a. A quantitative analysis of the effects of the regional employment premium and other regional policy instruments. InThe economics of industrial subsidies, ed. A. Whiting, pp. 55–79. London: Department of Industry, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. and Rhodes, J. 1976b. Regional economic policy and the movement of manufacturing firms to development areas.Economica 43: 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F. and Tukey, J. W. 1977.Data analysis and regression. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P. 1979.Multidimensional spatial data and decision analysis. New York/Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P. 1984. Qualitative spatial impact analysis. InSpatial, environmental and resource policy in the developing countries, eds. M. Chatterji P. Nijkamp, T. R. Lakshamanan and C. R. Pathak, pp. 79–91. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P. and Rietveld, P. 1982. Measurement of the effectiveness of regional policies by means of multiregional economic models. InMultiregional economic modelling: practice and prospect, eds. B. Issaev, P. Nijkamp, P. Rietveld and F. Snickars, pp. 55–82. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P. and Rietveld, P. 1984.Information systems for integrated regional planning. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P., Leitner, H., and Wrigley, N., eds. 1985.Measuring the unmeasurable. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, L. 1980. Regional industrial policies in a small, open economy: a retrospective study of means, effects, and limitations of Swedish regional policies 1965–1975. Unpublished paper.

  • Ossterhaven, J. 1981.Interregional input-output analysis and Dutch regional policy problems. Aldershot, Hampshire: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleeter, S. 1980.Economic impact analysis. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poolman, F. S. and Wever, E. 1978. Vestigingspremies en lokale arbeidsmarkt (Location aids and labor markets). Nijmegen: Institute for Geography and Planning, University of Nijmegen, Publication no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker, E. 1977.Erfolgskontrolle regionaler Aktionsprogramma durch Indicatoren (Effectiveness measurement of regional policy programs by means of indicators). Bonn, West Germany: Forschung zur Raumentwicklung 6.

  • Richardson, H. W. 1979.Regional and urban economics. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, J. A. 1979. Macro evaluations of the impact of regional policy in Britain: a review of recent research.Urban Studies 16: 118–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers, J. H. G. 1977.Sociologische Onderzoeksmethoden. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. 1954. Causal ordering and identifiability. InStudies in econometric method, eds. W. C. Hord and T. C. Koopmans, pp. 112–39. Cowles Commission Monograph no. 14. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strotz, R. H. and Wold, H. 1960. Recursive vs. non-recursive systems: an attempt at syntheses.Econometrica 28: 417–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tervo, H. and Okko, P. 1983. A note on shift-share analysis as a method of estimating the employment effects of regional economic policy.Journal of Regional Science 23: 115–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. 1957. Specification errors and the estimation of economic relationships.Review International Statistics Institute 25: 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuppen, J. 1979. New towns in the Paris region: an appraisal.Town Planning Review 50: 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Duyn, J. J. 1975. De doelmatigheid van het regionaal economisch beleid in Nederland in de jaren zestig.Tijdschrift voor Econcomische en Sociale Geografie 66: 128–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kessel, N. 1983. Effect-analyse in de ruimtelijke ordening. Delft: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Research Memorandum 83-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhove, N. 1962.De doelmatigheid van het regionaal-economisch beleid in Nederland. Rotterdam: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbanks, T. J. and Lee, R. 1985. Policy analysis in theory and practice. InLarge-scale energy projects: assessment of regional consequences, eds. B. Johansson and T. R. Lakshmanan, pp. 273–304. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H. 1954. Causality and econometrics.Econometrica 22: 162–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, State University, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Henk Folmer

  2. Department of Economics, Free University, P.O. Box 7161, 1007 MC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Peter Nijkamp

Authors
  1. Henk Folmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Nijkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Folmer, H., Nijkamp, P. Methodological aspects of impact analysis of regional economic policy. Papers of the Regional Science Association 57, 165–181 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01935288

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01935288

Keywords

Search

Navigation