Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships among some classes of implicit Runge-Kutta methods and their stability functions

  • Part II Numerical Mathematics
  • Published:
BIT Numerical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we apply the theory for implicit Runge-Kutta methods presented by Stetter to a number of subclasses of methods that have recently been discussed in the literature. We first show how each of these classes can be expressed within this theoretical framework and from this we are able to establish a number of relationships among these classes. In addition to improving the current state of understanding of these methods, their expression within this theoretical framework makes it possible for us to obtain results giving general forms for their stability functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. M. G. van Bokhoven,Efficient higher order implicit one-step methods for integration of stiff differential equations, BIT 20 (1980), 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. C. Butcher,Implicit Runge-Kutta processes, Math. Comp. 18 (1964), 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  3. id.,, Math. Comp. 26 (1972), 79–106.

    Google Scholar 

  4. id.,, BIT 24 (1984), 425–440.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. R. Cash,A class of implicit Runge-Kutta methods for the numerical integration of stiff ordinary differential equations, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 22 (1975), 504–511.

    Google Scholar 

  6. id.,, in Proc. International Conference on Stiff Computation, Utah, R. C. Aikens, ed., Oxford University Press, London (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. R. Cash and D. R. Moore,A high order method for the numerical solution of two-point boundary value problems, BIT 20 (1980), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. R. Cash and A. Singhal,Mono-implicit Runge-Kutta formulae for the numerical integration of stiff differential systems, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 2 (1982), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  9. id.,, BIT 22 (1982), 184–199.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. H. Enright and P. H. Muir,Efficient classes of Runge-Kutta methods for two-point boundary value problems, Computing 37 (1986), 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Gupta,An adaptive boundary value Runge-Kutta solver for first order boundary value problems, SIAM J. Numer, Anal. 22 (1985), 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. H. Hundsdorfer and M. N. Spijker,A note on B-stability of Runge-Kutta methods, Numer. Math. 36 (1981), 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. H. Muir,Implicit Runge-Kutta methods for two-point boundary value problems, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto; Also Department of Computer Science, Tech. Rep. 175/84 (1984), University of Toronto.

  14. R. Scherer and H. Türke,Reflected and transposed methods, BIT 23 (1983), 262–266.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Sherman and W. J. Morrison,Adjustment of an inverse matrix corresponding to changes in the elements of a given column or a given row of the original matrix, Ann. Math. Statist. 20 (1949), 621.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. J. Stetter,Analysis of Discretization Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York (1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muir, P.H., Enright, W.H. Relationships among some classes of implicit Runge-Kutta methods and their stability functions. BIT 27, 403–423 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01933734

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01933734

AMS categories

Keywords

Navigation