Summary
The conventional catheter method for measuring specialized A-V nodal and His-ventricular conduction times in the intact dog heart precludes an unanesthetized control. This control is necessary for meaningful studies of the effect of drugs or drug-drug interactions on A-V conduction times. At right thoracotomy (halothane anesthesia), mongrel dogs had bipolar electrodes sutured to the epicardial surface of both atrial appendages, juctions of the sulcus terminalis with both vena cavae, and right ventricle. A unipolar needle electrode, referenced to a unipolar electrode on the ascending aorta, was inserted into the interatrial septum from the aortic root for recording the His bundle electrogram. After one to three weeks for stabilization, weekly measurements were made of A-V nodal conduction time (AVN) and His-ventricular conduction time (H-V) for up to 52 weeks (4 to 52 weeks). Mean values (13 dogs) for spontaneous cycle length, AVN and H-V conduction times were 477±25, 82±3, and 30±1 msec, respectively. Simultaneous recordings from catheter and implanted His bundle electrodes were made during changes in atrial paced rate (five dogs, pentobarbital anesthesia). Values for AVN and H-V conduction times from catheter or implanted electrodes were the same. AVN conduction time increased, H-V conduction time remained constant during increases in atrial rate. Atropine shortened and propranolol prolonged AVN conduction time in six unanesthetized, unsedated dogs; neither affected H-V conduction time. Histologic examination of electrode sites in two dogs at 43 and 52 weeks showed no evidence of damage to underlying myocardial recording sites. This preparation provides reproducible awake values for AVN and H-V conduction times, and hence a more meaningful control for pharmacologic investigations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Scherlag BJ, Helfant RH, Damato AN (1968) A catheterization technique for His bundle stimulation and recording in the intact dog. J Appl Physiol, 25:425–428
Lieberman NA, Harris RS, Katz RI, Lipschutz HM, Dolgin M, Fisher VJ (1968) The effects of lidocaine on the electrical and mechanical activity of the heart. Am J Cardiol 22:375–380
Paulay KL, Damato AN (1975) Effect of digoxin on sinus nodal reentry in the dog. Amer J Cardiol 35:370–375
Atlee JL, Rusy BF (1972) Halothane depression of A-V conduction studied by electrograms of the bundle of His in dogs. Anesthesiology 36:112–118
Atlee JL, Rusy BF (1977) Atrioventricular conduction times and atrioventricular nodal conductivity during enflurane anesthesia in dogs. Anesthesiology 47:498–503
Baum T, Peters JR, Butz F, Much DR, (1975) A method for the placement of His bundle electrodes and production of atrioventricular block in dogs. J Appl Physiol 58:932–933
Mertz TE, Blouin LT (1973) Chronic His bundle electrograms in dogs. Pharmacologist 15: 192 (abstract)
Steiner C, Kovalik ATW (1968) A simple technique for production of chronic complete heart block in dogs. J Appl Physiol 25:631–632
Scherlag BJ, Abelleira JL, Samet P (1971) Electrode catheter recordings from the his bundle and left bundle in the intact dog. In: Kao F (ed) Research in Physiology, Bologna, pp 233–238
Narula OS, Scherlag BJ, Samet P (1970) Prevenous pacing of the specialized conducting system in man. His bundle and A-V nodal stimulation. Circulation 41:77–87
Scherlag BJ, Lau SH, Helfant RH, Stein E, Berkowitz W, Damato AN (1969) Catheter technique for recording of His bundle activity in man. Circulation, 39:13–18
Narula OS (1979) Electrophysiology of normal impulse propagation. In: Narula OS (ed) Cardiac arrhythmias: Electrophysiology, diagnosis and management, p 58, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
Karpawich PP, Gillette PC, Lewis RM, Zimmer A, McNamara DG (1983) Chronic epicardial His bundle recordings in awake nonsedated dogs: A new method. Am Heart J 105:16–21
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atlee, J.L., Dayer, A.M. & Houge, J.C. Chronic recording from the His bundle of the awake dog. Basic Res Cardiol 79, 627–638 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01908381
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01908381