Summary
In six isolated rabbit hearts perfused with a pressure source and Krebs-Henseleit as the perfusion medium, the effect of left ventricular pressure on coronary inflow in the maximally vasodilated bed was studied. This effect was determined from isovolumic beats, low afterloaded isobaric beats (afterload maintained at values below 10 mm Hg) and during cardiac arrest. For isovolumic beats end-diastolic left ventricular pressure was varied by means of an intraventricular balloon between 0–40 mm Hg and systolic left ventricular pressure varied between 90–130 mm Hg. In these ranges diastolic inflow decreased significantly 18±6% (mean±SD) with increasing pressure and systolic inflow could not be shown to depend on pressure (n=6). For isobaric beats, diastolic and systolic inflow remained at values similar to those found for the isovolumic beats (n=6). In the arrested heart inflow diminished 8±2% when the pressure in the left ventricle was increased from 0 to 40 mm Hg (n=3). We conclude that systolic coronary inflow is hardly affected by left ventricular pressure. Systolic inflow decreased by the same amount in the isovolumically and isobarically beating heart, when cardiac contractility was enhanced by epinephrine infusion. We suggest the results can be explained on the basis of the time-varying elastance concept: systolic elastance is the same for isovolumic and isobaric beats but depends on contractility. Models that relate coronary inflow impediment to left ventricular pressure should therefore be reevaluated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archie JP (1975) Intramyocardial pressure: effect of preload on transmural distribution of systolic coronary blood flow. Am J Cardiol 35:904–911
Archie JP (1978) Transmural distribution of intrinsic and transmitted left ventricular diastolic intramyocardial pressure in dogs. Cardiovasc Res 12:255–262
Bardenheuer H, Schrader J (1983) Relationship between myocardial oxygen consumption, coronary flow and adenosine release in an improved isolated working heart preparation of guinea pigs. Circ Res 51:263–271
Buckberg GD, Fixler DE, Archie JP, Hoffman JIE (1972) Experimental subendocardial ischemia in dogs with normal coronary arteries. Circ Res 30:67–81
Downey JM, Downey HF, Kirk ES (1974) Effects of myocardial strains on coronary flow. Circ Res 34:286–292
Downey JM, Kirk ES (1974) Distribution of the coronary blood flow across the canine heart wall during systole. Circ Res 34:251–257
Downey JM, Kirk ES (1975) Inhibition of coronary blood flow by a vascular waterfall mechanism. Circ Res 36:753–760
Glantz SA, Parmley WR (1978) Factors which affect the diastolic pressure-volume curve. Circ Res 42:171–180
Heinemann FW, Grayson J (1985) Transmural distribution of intramyocardial pressure measured by micropipette technique. Am J Physiol 249:H1216-H1223
Hess DS, Bache RJ (1976) Transmural distribution of myocardial blood flow during systole in the awake dog. Circ Res 38:5–15
Paradise N, Surmitis J, MacKall C (1984) Oxygen reserve of left ventricle of isolated, saline perfused rabbit heart. Am J Physiol 247:H861-H868
Sabiston DC, Gregg DE (1957) The effect of cardiac contraction on coronary blood flow. Circulation 15:14–20
Sipkema P, Krams R, Westerhof N (1988) Systolic coronary flow impediment explained on basis of the time-varying clastance concept. FASEB, May 1–5, p 929
Spaan J, Breuls N, Laird JD (1981) Diastolic-systolic flow differences are caused by intramyocardial pump action in the anaesthesized dog. Circ Res 49:584–593
Suga H, Sugawa K, Shoukas AA (1973) Load independence of the instantaneous pressure-volume ratio of the canine left ventricle and effects of epinephrine and heart rate on the ratio. Circ Res 32:314–322
Dijk LC van, Krams R, Sipkema P, Westerhof N (1988) Changes in the coronary pressure-flow relation after transition from blood to Tyrode perfusion. Am J Physiol 255:H476-H487
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This investigation is supported by the Netherlands Organisation for the Advancement of Pure Research (NWO-grant: FHC-5 810-906-005).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krams, R., van Haelst, A.C.T.A., Sipkema, P. et al. Can coronary systolic-diastolic flow differences be predicted by left ventricular pressure or time-varying intramyocardial elastance?. Basic Res Cardiol 84, 149–159 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01907924
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01907924