Skip to main content
Log in

Cytoplasmic male sterility in petunia. II. A discussion on male sterility transmission by means of grafting

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The aim of this study was to explore any possible mutual influence after grafting cytoplasmic male sterile and fertile petunia plants. In the graft generation no mutual influence of the graft partners was observed and progeny obtained by self- or cross-fertilizing graft components did not provide convincing indications as to sterilizing or fertilizing influence. Reduced fertile or even male sterile flowers were sometimes observed on some descendants of fertile graft components, but in all cases they had to be ascribed to causes other than sterility transmission.

Critical analysis of the results and conclusions drawn by other authors infer that they have not conclusively shown sterility transmission by grafting either.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bianchi, F., 1963. Transmission of male-sterility inPetunia by grafting. Genen Phaenen 8: 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cley, G., 1967. Influencing of the cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility in beets. Euphytica 16: 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, M. K. &Edwardson, J. R., 1964. Intergraft transmission of cytoplasmic male sterility. Nature 201: 847–848.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, G. J., 1967. Graft-transmission of male sterility in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Euphytica 16: 419–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwardson, J. R., 1967. Cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration inCrotalaria mucronata. J. Hered. 58: 266–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwardson, J. R. &Corbett, M. K., 1961. Asexual transmission of cytoplasmic male sterility. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. 47: 390–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, R., 1956. Graft induced transmission to progeny of cytoplasmic male sterility inPetunia. Science 124: 684–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, R., 1962. Further evidence on graft induced transmission to progeny of cytoplasmic male sterility inPetunia. Genetics 47: 641–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, R., 1964. The nature of cytoplasmic male sterility in petunias. Spec. Bull. 69, Nat. and Univ. Inst. Agric., Rehovot: I–VIII (English summary).

  • Marrewijk, G. A. M. van, 1968. Plasmatische mannelijke steriliteit en fertiliteitsherstel bij de petunia. Meded. Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen 68 (No. 16): 129 pp.

  • Marrewijk, G. A. M. van, 1969. Cytoplasmic male sterility in petunia I. Restoration of fertility with special reference to the influence of environment. Euphytica 18: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, Y., 1961. Grafting and cytoplasmic male sterility inCapsicum. Seiken Zihô 12: 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, M. M., 1933. The cytoplasmic inheritance of male sterility inZea mays. J. Genet. 27: 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand, A. S., 1960. Autonomy of cytoplasmic male sterility in grafted scions of tobacco. Science, N.Y., 131: 665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeven, A. C., 1967. Transfer and inactivation of male sterility and sources of restorer genes in wheat. Euphytica 16: 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Marrewijk, G.A.M. Cytoplasmic male sterility in petunia. II. A discussion on male sterility transmission by means of grafting. Euphytica 19, 25–32 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01904662

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01904662

Keywords

Navigation