Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Primary slings for everyone with genuine stress incontinence? The Argument for ...

  • Editorial
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blaivas JG. Treatment of female incontinence secondary to damage or loss.Urol Clin North Am 1991;18:355–363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Appell RA. Artificial sphincter and periurethral injections. In: Benson JT ed. Female pelvic floor disorders New York: W.W. Norton, 1992;257–268

    Google Scholar 

  3. Appell RA. Injectable for urethral Incompetence.World J Urol 1990;8:208–211

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA et al. Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence.J Urol 1997;158:875–880

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ostergard DR. Primary slings for everyone with genuine stress incontinence? The argument against (Editorial).Int Urogynecol J 1997;8:321–322

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ball TP Jr, Teichman MH, Sharkey FE, Rogenes VJ, Adrian EK Jr. Terminal nerve distribution to the urethra and bladder neck: considerations in the management of stress urinary incontinence.J Urol 1997;158:822–826

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, A/100 Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, 44195, Cleveland, OH, USA

    R. A. Appell

Authors
  1. R. A. Appell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Appell, R.A. Primary slings for everyone with genuine stress incontinence? The Argument for .... Int Urogynecol J 9, 249–251 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901499

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901499

Search

Navigation