Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrametric tree representations of incomplete dissimilarity data

  • Authors Of Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Classification Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The least squares algorithm for fitting ultrametric trees to proximity data originally proposed by Carroll and Pruzansky and further elaborated by De Soete is extended to handle missing data. A Monte Carlo evaluation reveals that the algorithm is capable of recovering an ultrametric tree underlying an incomplete set of error-perturbed dissimilarities quite well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ARABIE, P., and CARROLL, J. D. (1980), “MAPCLUS: A Mathematical Programming Approach to Fitting the ADCLUS Model,”Psychometrika, 45, 211–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARROLL, J. D., and ARABIE, P. (1983), “INDCLUS: An Individual Differences Generalization of the ADCLUS Model and the MAPCLUS Algorithm,”Psychometrika, 48, 157–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARROLL, J. D., CLARK, L. A., and DeSARBO, W. S. (1984), “The Representation of Three-Way Proximities Data by Single and Multiple Tree Structure Models,”Journal of Classification, 1, 25–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARROLL, J. D., and PRUZANSKY, S. (1975), “Fitting of Hierarchical Tree Structure (HTS) Models, Mixtures of HTS Models, and Hybrid Models, via Mathematical Programming and Alternating Least Squares,” Paper presented at the U.S.-Japan Seminar on Theory, Methods and Applications of Multidimensional Scaling and Related Techniques, San Diego, CA.

  • CARROLL, J. D., and PRUZANSKY, S. (1980), “Discrete and Hybrid Scaling Models,” inSimilarity and Choice, eds. E. D. Lantermann and H. Feger, Bern: Huber, 108–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • COHEN, A., GNANADESIKAN, R., KETTENRING, J. R., and LANDWEHR, J. M. (1977), “Methodological Developments in Some Applications of Clustering,” inApplications of Statistics, ed. P. R. Krishnaiah, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • De SOETE, G. (1983), “A Least Squares Algorithm for Fitting Additive Trees to Proximity Data,”Psychometrika, 48, 621–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • De SOETE, G. (1984), “A Least Squares Algorithm for Fitting an Ultrametric Tree to a Dissimilarity Matrix,”Pattern Recognition Letters, 2, 133–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • De SOETE, G., DeSARBO, W. S., FURNAS, G. W., and CARROLL, J. D. (1984), “The Estimation of Ultrametric and Path Length Trees from Rectangular Proximity Data,”Psychometrika, 49, 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • FURNAS, G. W. (1981), “The Construction of Random, Terminally Labeled, Binary Trees,” Unpublished Memorandum, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • GNANADESIKAN, R., KETTENRING, J. R., and LANDWEHR, J. M. (1977), “Interpreting and Assessing the Results of Cluster Analyses,”Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 47, 451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARTIGAN, J. A. (1967), “Representation of Similarity Matrices by Trees,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 1140–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARTIGAN, J. A. (1975),Clustering Algorithms, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • JARDINE, C. J., JARDINE, N., and SIBSON, R. (1967), “The Structure and Construction of Taxonomic Hierarchies,”Mathematical Biosciences, 1, 173–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • JARDINE, N., and SIBSON, R. (1971),Mathematical Taxonomy, London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, S. C. (1967), “Hierarchical Clustering Schemes,”Psychometrika, 32, 241–254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • POWELL, M. J. D. (1977), “Restart Procedures for the Conjugate Gradient Method,”Mathematical Programming, 12, 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • SNEATH, P. H., and SOKAL, R. R. (1973),Numerical Taxonomy, San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Geert De Soete is “Aangesteld Navorser” of the Belgian “National Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Soete, G. Ultrametric tree representations of incomplete dissimilarity data. Journal of Classification 1, 235–242 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01890124

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01890124

Keywords

Navigation