Skip to main content
Log in

Nontumorous attenuation differences on computed tomographic portography

  • Published:
Gastrointestinal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nineteen patients with suspected hepatic neoplasms underwent dynamic computed tomography (CT) and computed tomographic portography (CTP) in a preoperative setting. Nontumorous attenuation differences in the liver were observed in 8 patients (42%) with CTP and in 2 patients (10.5%) with dynamic CT (p<0.05).

Although nontumorous attenuation differences are significantly more frequent with CTP than with dynamic CT, they are seldom a diagnostic problem because of their geographic pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moss AA, Dean PB, Axel L, Goldberg HI, Glazer GM, Friedman MA: Dynamic CT of hepatic masses with intravenous and intraarterial contrast material.AJR 138:847–852, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matsui O, Takashima T, Kadoya M, Ida M, Suzuki M, Kitagawa K, Kamimura R, Inoue K, Konishi H, Itoh H: Dynamic computed tomography during arterial portography: the most sensitive examination for small hepatocellular carcinomas.J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:19–24, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boulanger A, Mathieu D, Rousseau M, Randon P, Vasile N: Etude du portoscanner dans l'évaluation des tumeurs malignes hépatiques.J Belge Radio 169:329–334, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matsui O, Takashima T, Kadoya M, Suzuki M, Hirose J, Kameyama T, Choto S, Konishi H, Ida M, Yamaguchi A, Izumi R: Lover metastases from colorectal cancers: detection with CT during arterial portography.Radiology 165:65–69, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miller DL, Simmons JT, Chang R, Ward BA, Shawker TH, Doppman JL, Chang AE: Hepatic metastasis detection: comparison of three CT contrast enhancement methods.Radiology 165:785–790, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  6. Itai Y, Hachiya J, Makita K, Ohtomo K, Kokubo T, Yamauchi T: Transient hepatic attenuation differences on dynamic computed tomography.J Comput Assist Tomogr 11:461–465, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  7. Freeny PC, Marks WM: Hepatic perfusion abnormalities during CT angiography: detection and interpretation.Radiology 159:685–691, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Beers B, Pringot J, Chullikal A, Dautrebande J: La tomodensitométrie artérielle du foie comparée à la tomodensitométrie conventionnelle et à l'artériographie.J Belge Radiol 69:321–327, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matsui O: Hepatic metastasis detection: comparison of three CT contrast enhancement methods [letter].Radiology 168:283–284, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rabinowitz JG, Kinkabwala M, Ulreich S: Macro-regenerating nodule in the cirrhotic liver.AJR 121:401–411, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wenker JC, Baker MK, Ellis JH, Glant MD: Focal fatty infiltration of the liver: demonstration by magnetic resonance imaging.AJR 143:573–574, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  12. Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Kokubo T, Okada Y, Yamauchi T, Yoshida H: Segmental intensity differences in the liver on MR imaging: a sign of intrahepatic portal flow stoppage.Radiology 167:11–19, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lundstedt C, Gotberg S, Lunderquist A, Stridbeck H, Ekberg H: Computed tomographic angiography of the liver via the coeliac axis.Acta Radiol 27:285–292, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  14. Foley WD: Dynamic hepatic CT.Radiology 170:617–622, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  15. Widrich WC, Nordahl DL, Robbins AH: Contrast enhancement of the mesenteric and portal veins using intraarterial papaverine.AJR 121:374–379, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fischer HW: Incompatibilities between contrast media and pharmacologic agents.Radiology 162:875, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  17. McGill JE, Rysavy JA, Frick MP: Experimental investigations of the Hexabrix-papaverine interaction.Radiology 166:577–578, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yates CK, Streight RA: Focal fatty infiltration of the liver simulating metastatic disease.Radiology 159:83–84, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshikawa J, Matsui O, Takashima T, Sugiura H, Katayama K, Nishida Y, Tsuji M: Focal fatty change of the liver adjacent to the falciform ligament.AJR 149:491–494, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gale E, Gerzof SG, Robbins AH: Portal architecture: a differential guide to fatty infiltration of the liver on computed tomography.Gastrointest Radiol 8:231–236, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  21. Inamoto K, Sugiki K, Yamasaki H, Miura T: CT of hepatoma: effects of portal vein obstruction.AJR 136:349–353, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  22. Takayasu K, Muramatsu Y, Shima Y, Moriyama N, Yamada T, Makuuchi M: Hepatic lobar atrophy following obstruction of the ipsilateral portal vein from hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Radiology 160:389–393, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  23. Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Kokubo T, Minami M, Yoshida H: CT and MR imaging of postnecrotic liver scars.J Comput Assist Tomogr 12:971–975, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jeffrey RB, Moss AA, Quivey JM, Federle MP, Wara WM: CT of radiation-induced hepatic injury.AJR 135:445–448, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rigauts HD, Selleslag DL, Van Eyken PL, Van Damme BJ, Fevery JM, Marchai GJ: Erythromycin-induced hepatitis: simulator of malignancy.Radiology 169:661–662, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  26. Adler DD, Glazer GM, Silver TM: Computed tomography of liver infarction.AJR 142:315–318, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  27. Itai Y, Furui S, Ohtomo K, Kokubo T, Yamauchi T, Minami M, Yashiro N: Dynamic CT features of arterioportal shunts in hepatocellular carcinoma.AJR 146:723–727, 1986

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Beers, B., Pringot, J., Gigot, JF. et al. Nontumorous attenuation differences on computed tomographic portography. Gastrointest Radiol 15, 107–111 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888750

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888750

Key words

Navigation